Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
AGOSH Vs The state rep.by, Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Agosh ..Petitioner Vs1. The state rep. by, The Inspector of Police, (Cr.No.203/2024)2. Melvin JR Pace Overseas Criminal Investigator, on behalf of U.S. Consulate General, No.220, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 006. ..RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records and to quash the FIR in Crime No.203/2024 on the file of respondent police and all proceedings arising therefrom, in the interests of justice, equity, and to prevent abuse of the process of law. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sathya Kumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh, Government Advocate For R1ORDERThe present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.203 of 2024, pending on the file of the first respondent Police. Page1 of 42. When the matter was taken up for hearing toda...
S.Kousalya vs the Branch Manager
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL IN CMA NO. 3328 OF 20251. S.Kousalya W/o. Late Saravanan, Res. at No.12/27, Bhuthar Street, Kumarapalayam, Kumarapalayam Taluk, Namakkal District.2. Minor S. Priyadarshini D/o. Late Saravanan, Minor rep by her guardian, mother S. Kousalya, Res. at No.12/27, Bhuthar Street, Kumarapalayam, Kumarapalayam Taluk, ..Appellant(s) Vs1. The Branch Manager Policy issuing office at 74A, Paramathy Road, Namakkal.2. The Divisional Manager Office at 1st Floor, Selvanayagi Complex, Opposite to Petrol Bunk, Near Collector Office, Perundurai Road, Erode -011. Page1 of 63. Maheswari W/o. Late Senthilkumar, Paramathi Velur Taluk,4. Deepak S/o. Late Senthilkumar, Paramathi Velur Taluk, Namakkal District.5. Raju S/o. Varuthappa Naidu, Paramathi Velur Taluk, Namakkal District.6. Saraswathi W/o. Raju, Res. at No.2/207, Malligapuram, Cauvery Road, Pillikalpala...
The Branch Manager Vs K.Suresh
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
C.M.P. No.3332 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.6032 of 2026K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.Dispensed with for the present.2. The Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same in the usual course. 26.02.2026 mps https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
P.SELVARAJ Vs State represented by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.02.2026Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN P.Selvaraj ... Petitioner Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, M-3 Kovilpalayam Police Station, Coimbatore District. ...Respondent Cr.No.229 of 2014Prayer: This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking suspension of For Petitioner : Mr.A.Abdul Lathif For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodaran, Addl. Public Prosecutor *******ORDER(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.) This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking suspension of 2 It is seen that typed set of papers are being made ready and this Court is also inclined to take up the main appeal itself for hearing and hence this miscellaneous petition seeking suspension of sentence is closed. 3 List the appeal for hearing in the usual course. [PVJ] [MJRJ] cgi To1. III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore.2. The Inspector of Police, M-3 Kov...
Babu M Vs The Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
C.M.P.No.1570 of 2026 in W.A.SR.No.8490 of 2026R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDSHAMIM AHMED, J.(Order of the Court was made by R. SURESH KUMAR, J.) This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 40 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Mr.M.Bindran, learned AdditionalGovernment Pleader accepts notice for the respondents 1 & 2 and he has no serious objection in allowing the petition. R3 though had been served and the name and the address of the third respondent has been printed in the cause list, no one is appearing on behalf of him.4. Since the delay is 40 days, having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. (R.S.K., J.) (S.S.A., J.) 26.02.2026 vji https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
G.K.Rajkumar @ Rajkumar Gopalsamy Krishnaraj Vs The State Rep. by the ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in Crl.OP No. 18623 of 2025 G.K.Rajkumar @ Rajkumar Gopalsamy Krishnaraj ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, ..Respondent(s) To relax the condition imposed in Para No. 7(C) by this Honble Court in Crl.OP No. 18623/2025 dt. 10.07.2025 and pass such other orders as this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Dinesh For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.OP No. 18623 of 2025 by order dated 10.07.2025, passed by this Court to report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI 2.When the matter was came up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent police reported that the case has been investigated and the final report is filed as a mistake of fact.3. C...
P.ANANDHAN Vs State by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in ..Petitioner(s) Vs State by, The Inspector of Police, AWPS, Neyveli Police Station, Cr.No.19 of 2021. ..Appellant(s) Vs State Rep By The Inspector Of Police, AWPS,Neyveli Police Station, Cr.No.19/2021. To modify the bail condition that to executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) with two sureties, imposed in Crl.MP.No.18689 of 2023 in Crl.A.No.469 of 2023, dated 25.10.2025. To call for the records and set aside the conviction and sentence imposed against the appellant on 23.08.2022 in Spl SC no. 85/2021 on the file of the Page1 of 4 Special Court for Exclusive trial of cases under POCSO act, Cuddalore District and acquit the appellant For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Pugalenthi For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate(criminal Side)OrderThe petitioner seeks modification of the condition imposed by this Court while suspending the sentence on 25....
S. Kalaiselvi Vs The District collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI S.Kalaiselvi Petitioner Vs Salem District -636 112 ...Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent by way of reply notice and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to consider the petitioner representation and select the petitioner as Anganvadi Assistant based on theguidelines issued by the 1st respondent.For Petitioner : Mr.L.Ramu For Respondents : Mr.R.V.Dinesh Rajkumar, Additional Government PleaderORDERThis writ petition has been filed praying to quash the order passed by the 3rd respondent by way of reply notice and consequently to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner representation and select the petitioner as Anganvadi Assistant based on the guidelines issued by the 1st respondent...
Jeeva P K Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1.Jeeva P.K 2.K.Priya ... Petitioners Vs. The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police ( Crime) Crime No.11 of 2026 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.11 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.Bhavani For Respondent : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDERThe petitioners herein apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 318(3), 318(4) and 351(4) of BNS,2023 in Crime No.11 of 2026, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners wereengaged as Auditors for filing GST Returns of the defacto complainant and a sum of Rs.30,61,514.19/- wa...
A. Muniraja Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.02.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED CMP.Nos.4395, 4398 and 4399 Plaintiff 2026 A.Muniraja Appellant Vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Secretary Commercial Taxes and Registration Department4. The Sub Registrar, Avadi, Chennai-54 RespondentsPrayer:- This Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, to set aside the order dated 18.12.2025 passed in WP.No.48678 of 2025, by the Writ Court and to allow the WP.No.48678 of 2025, by granting the relief sought for therein. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Om Prakash, SC For Respondent : Mr.P.Harish, GAJUDGEMENT(Order of the Court was delivered by R.Suresh Kumar, J.)1. The learned Senior Counsel for the appellant, after some arguments, wantsto withdraw this Writ Appeal, with a liberty to approach the Committee, constituted under Section 47AA of the Registration Act, by making a detailed representation, seeking for fi...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »