S.Kousalya vs the Branch Manager

S.Kousalya vs The Branch Manager

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 26, 2026

~4 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1417051

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1417051
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar,Honourable Mr.Justice R.Sakthivel
Decided On: Feb 26, 2026
Case Number: CMP/1845/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Kousalya

Respondent

The Branch Manager

Excerpt

.....tribunal, special district judge, erode as per the order passed by this hon’ble court in cmp no 27430 of 2025 in cma no. 3328 of 2025 dated 11.11.2025. for appellant(s): mr.r.marudhachalamurthy for respondent(s): mr.s.arunkumar for r1 & r2order(order of the court was made by n.sathish kumar j.) this petition has been filed seeking permission to withdraw the amount deposited to the credit of mcop no.650 of 2018.2. the tribunal has passed an award for rs.2,44,95,133/- along with interest at the rate of 7.5%. challenging the method of quantification, the insurance company has filed the present appeal.3. when the appeal is entertained by this court, an order of interim staywas granted subject to the condition that the appellants shall deposit 75% of the award amount along with interest to the credit of mcop no.650 of 2018. pursuant to the said order, it appears that the amount has been deposited to the credit of mcop no.650 of 2018. page3 of 64. now, this petition is taken out by the petitioners / respondents 1 and 2.the first petitioner is the mother of the second petitioner. she sought permission to withdraw the amount lying not only for her share, but also the share of the minor, the second petitioner herein. the reason for withdrawal is to settle the liability of her husband. this court is of the view that since the very challenge is made to the quantum and considering the nature of the award passed by the tribunal and the nature of the income of the first petitioner, the first petitioner is permitted to withdraw 50% of the share as quantified by the tribunal.5. for this, the learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 has no objection.6. as far as the minor share is concerned, we are not inclined to grantpermission to withdraw any amount. the first petitioner is permitted to withdraw only 50% of her share on filing necessary application before the trial court. on such application being filed by the first petitioner, the trial court shall permit the.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26-02-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL IN CMA NO. 3328 OF 2025
1. S.Kousalya W/o. Late Saravanan, Res. at No.12/27, Bhuthar Street, Kumarapalayam, Kumarapalayam Taluk, Namakkal District.
2. Minor S. Priyadarshini D/o. Late Saravanan, Minor rep by her guardian, mother S. Kousalya, Res. at No.12/27, Bhuthar Street, Kumarapalayam, Kumarapalayam Taluk, ..Appellant(s) Vs
1. The Branch Manager Policy issuing office at 74A, Paramathy Road, Namakkal.
2. The Divisional Manager Office at 1st Floor, Selvanayagi Complex, Opposite to Petrol Bunk, Near Collector Office, Perundurai Road, Erode -011. Page1 of 6
3. Maheswari W/o. Late Senthilkumar, Paramathi Velur Taluk,
4. Deepak S/o. Late Senthilkumar, Paramathi Velur Taluk, Namakkal District.
5. Raju S/o. Varuthappa Naidu, Paramathi Velur Taluk, Namakkal District.
6. Saraswathi W/o. Raju, Res. at No.2/207, Malligapuram, Cauvery Road, Pillikalpalayam, Paramathi Velur Taluk,
7. Jyothi W/o. Late Venkatesan, Res. at D.No.5/53/30-4, Thendral Street, 1st Street, Gandhi Nagar, Kumarapalayam, Kumarapalayam Taluk, Namakkal District.
8. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Office at KMR Complex, Mettur Main Road, Bhavani Town and Taluk, Erode District. ..Respondent(s) Page2 of 6
PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 151 of C.P.C., to permit the petitioners to withdraw the amount deposited to the credit of MCOP No.650 of 2018 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special District Judge, Erode as per the order passed by this Hon’ble Court in CMP No 27430 of 2025 in CMA No. 3328 of 2025 dated 11.11.2025. For Appellant(s): Mr.R.Marudhachalamurthy For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arunkumar for R1 & R2

Order

(Order of the Court was made by N.Sathish Kumar J.) This Petition has been filed seeking permission to withdraw the amount deposited to the credit of MCOP No.650 of 2018.

2. The Tribunal has passed an award for Rs.2,44,95,133/- along with interest at the rate of 7.5%. Challenging the method of quantification, the Insurance Company has filed the present Appeal.

3. When the Appeal is entertained by this Court, an order of interim stay

was granted subject to the condition that the appellants shall deposit 75% of the award amount along with interest to the credit of MCOP No.650 of 2018. Pursuant to the said order, it appears that the amount has been deposited to the credit of MCOP No.650 of 2018. Page3 of 6

4. Now, this Petition is taken out by the petitioners / respondents 1 and 2.

The first petitioner is the mother of the second petitioner. She sought permission to withdraw the amount lying not only for her share, but also the share of the minor, the second petitioner herein. The reason for withdrawal is to settle the liability of her husband. This Court is of the view that since the very challenge is made to the quantum and considering the nature of the award passed by the Tribunal and the nature of the income of the first petitioner, the first petitioner is permitted to withdraw 50% of the share as quantified by the Tribunal.

5. For this, the learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 has no objection.

6. As far as the minor share is concerned, we are not inclined to grant

permission to withdraw any amount. The first petitioner is permitted to withdraw only 50% of her share on filing necessary application before the Trial Court. On such application being filed by the first petitioner, the Trial Court shall permit the first petitioner alone to withdraw 50% of her share and the remaining amount that belongs to the share of the minor, shall be deposited in any Nationalised Bank under interest bearing account.

7. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. (N.S.K.,J.) (R.S.V.,J.) 26-02-2026 gsk Page4 of 6 To

1. The Branch Manager Policy issuing office at 74A, Paramathy Road, Namakkal.

2. The Divisional Manager Office at 1st Floor, Selvanayagi Complex, Opposite to Petrol Bunk, Near Collector Office, Perundurai Road, Erode -011.

3. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.,

Office at KMR Complex, Mettur Main Road, Bhavani Town and Taluk, Erode District Page5 of 6 N.SATHISH KUMAR J. AND R.SAKTHIVEL J. GSK IN CMA NO. 3328 OF 2025 26-02-2026 Page6 of 6

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties S.Kousalya vs The Branch Manager Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar,Honourable Mr.Justice ...