Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jayalakshmi Vs Rangarajan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA Jayalakshmi ..Petitioner(s) Vs Rangarajan The Revenue Division Officer South Chennai Range, Guindy, Chennai- 32. ..Contemnor(s) Prayer: This Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying to punish the respondent for the wilful disobedience of theorder dated 12.02.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.4594 of 2025.For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Thenrajan For Contemnor(s): Ms.R.L.Karthika, Government AdvocateOrderThe Contempt Petition has been filed seeking to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.4594 of 2025 dated 12.02.2025. Page1 of 32. It is informed that the orders of this Court in W.P.No.4594 of 2025 dated 12.02.2025 has been complied with by way of the proceedings of the respondent dated 12.02.2026.3. Recording the above statement, the contempt petition is closed. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking order...
K.Sankaran Vs B.Kalaimani
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH K.Sankaran S/o. G.Krishnamoorthy, Door No.5-81, Agraharam, Vishnupuram, Kudavasal Taluk, Thiruvarur - 609 501. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The District Revenue Officer, Thiruvarur, Thiruvarur - 614 205. ..Contemnor(s) PRAYER: This Contempt Petition is filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to issue summon and punish the respondent/1stRespondent for his act of contempt of court, wilful disobedience of the orderpassed by this Court dated 05.11.2025 made in the above W.P.No.42395 of 2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr. A. S. Bhuvaneswaran For Contemnor(s): Mr. D. Ravichander Special Government Pleader Page1 of 2N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.AsiORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, the proceedings of the respondent dated 24.02.2026 was placed before this Court.2. Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. If the petitioneris aggrieved, it is left open t...
Pouchepavally vs Mouniammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Vs W/o.Ramamourthy, No.5, Impasse Des Martinets 60160, Montataire, France and Presently Come down and Staying at No.14, V Cross, Jayaram Chettiar Thottam, Vanarapet, Puducherry 605 001. Vs Page1 of 4 Vs To accept the revoke of my Power of Attorney and accept to file the second appeal. To accept the cause title and pass such further or other orders as this Court. For Appellant(s): Mr.D.Anandanarayan For Respondent(s): Mr.K.S.Karthik RajaORDER(i) In CMP No. 3890 of 2026: This Petition has been filed to accept the revoke of the petitioners Power of Attorney and accept to file the second appeal. Page2 of 4(ii) CMP No. 3884 of 2026: This Petition has been filed to accept the cause title.2. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and beingsatisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of both the petitions, both the Civil Miscellaneous Petitions ...
SRI MARUTHI TRAVELS Vs The General Manager
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and WMP No.7803 of 2026 Sri Maruthi Travels Rep. By its Proprietor, No.4/1 Bharathi Street, Chitturagadam, Ambattur, Chennai-600 053. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The General Manager Bank of India, Head Office,2. The Chief manager Zonal Office, No.17, Errabalu Street,3. The Zonal manager Chennai-600 001. ..Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents 2 and 3 to sanction and release Rs.20,89,972/- toward enhanced monthly hire charges and Page1 of 4 extra mileage charges on account of the sharp increase of fuel charges in respect of petitioner vehicle bearing registration No.(1) TN-13-U-9624 (2) TN-13- V-0065 (3) TN-13-V-0495 and (4) TN-13-V-1321 involved in cash van transport service to the Respondents in between 01.02.2021 to 31.01.2025 and For Petitioner(s): Mr. C.K.M. AppajiORDERThe ...
Sarangarajan Vs Sheeja
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Sarangarajan ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Contemnor(s) Prayer: This contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to punish the respondent for committing contempt of the order issued by this Court dated 04.11.2025 passed in W.P.No.40536 of 2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Arumuga Rajan For Contemnor(s): Mr.Abishek MurthyORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed seeking to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order dated 04.11.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.40536 of 2025.2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that, the order under contempt has been complied with. Page1 of 33. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, this Contempt Petition stands closed. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeut...
M.Pandurangan Vs U.Murugesan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA M.Pandurangan S/o. Mannugowundar, No.7/475,177th Street, Muthamizh Nagar, Kodungaiyur, Chennai - 600 118. ..Petitioner(s) Vs U.Murugesan The Revenue Divisional Officer, Villupuram, Villupuram District. ..Contemnor(s) Prayer: This Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying to punish the respondent for disobeying the order of this Honourable Court made in W.P.No.33211 of 2024 dated 14.11.2024. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Prabhavathy For Contemnor(s): Mr.T.K.Saravanan, Additional Government PleaderOrderThe Contempt Petition has been filed seeking to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.33211 of 2024 dated 14.11.2024. Page1 of 32. It is informed that the orders of this Court in W.P.No.33211 of 2024 dated 14.11.2024. has been complied with by way of the proceedings of the respondent dated 20.06.2025.3. Rec...
M/s Pattali Makkal Katchi Vs The Election Commission of India,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and W.M.P.Nos.3848 and 8108 of 2026 M/s Pattali Makkal Katchi Rep. by its Founder and present President Dr.S.Ramadoss, A registered and Unrecognized Political Party, No.63, Nattu Muthu Naickan Street, Vanniyar Teynampet, Chennai. Petitioner Vs Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order No.56/21/2024/PPS-II, dated30.07.2025 by the 1st respondent and quash the same as legal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 1st respondent issue a fresh communication of the allotment of Mango symbol to the Pattali Makkal Katchi having address at 63, Natumuthu, Naikan Street, Chennai as the petitioner Dr.S.Ramadoss being the present President is legally entitled for the allotment of sy...
D.Manikam vs Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI And 1.D.Manikam 2.S.Vinayagam 3.S.Ellumalai 4.R.Govindhan ... Petitioners Vs. 1.Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to the Government Forest and Chennai 15. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus and direct the respondents to appoint the petitioners as regular time scale forestry watchers on par with their juniors w.e.f 24/01/1995 in the light of the orders passed in W.P No. W.P No.23374/2008 dated 30.10.2009, W.A No.607/2010 dated 29.03.2010 and refix the pension and confer all consequential arrears and monetary benefits within the time as may be fixed by this Honble High Court. For Petitioners : Ms.P.Rachel Epsy for M/s.Kaavya Silambanan Associates For Respondents : Mr.C.Selvaraj Additional Government PleaderORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seek the permission of this Court t...
P.Dhanasekar Vs M.Sathish Kumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH P.Dhanasekar S/o.Vivekanandam, No.163, Pillaiyar Kovil St, Kosavanpettai, Rallapadi Village, Uthukkottai, Thiruvallur District 601101 ..Petitioner(s) Vs M.Sathish Kumar Revenue Divisional Officer, Ambattur, Chennai 600053 ..Contemnor(s) PRAYER: The Contempt Petition is filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempts of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for having committed contempt of court by disobeying the order of this Court dated 22.04.2025 passed in W.P.No.14113 of 2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr. R.Hari For Contemnor(s): Mr. Abishekmurthy Government Advocate Page1 of 3ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent produced the proceedings of the respondent dated 26.02.2026, wherein the respondent had already directed the Tahsildar, Ambattur Taluk, to effect necessary changes in the revenue re...
A.Anandhan, Vs R.Ramya,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
C.M.P.No.5630 of 2026 in C.R.P.SR.No.202738 of 2025P.B.BALAJI, J.This petitioner has been filed to recognize the Power Agent.2. This Court has gone through the affidavit and also heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. The petitioner having resided in abroad and hence, in order to prosecute the revision, he has appointed the Power Agent.4. I have independently gone through theaffidavit filed in support of this petition to recognize and accept the cause title, and I am satisfied that the petitioners have made out sufficient cause and accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 27.02.2026 (2/2) dna...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »