Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
C.Ravi Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR C.Ravi ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, ..Respondent(s) To relax the conditions imposed on the petitioner shall appear before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thiruvallur, on 05.02.2025 at 10.30 am and thereafter, on the dates to be fixed by the learned Magistrate in Crl.M.P.No.462/2025 in Crl.O.P.No.22733 of 2024 dated 21.01.2025. For Petitioner(s): M/s.V.Ragunathan For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.462/2025 in Crl.O.P.No.22733 of 2024 by order dated 21.01.2025, passed by this Court to report before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thiruvallur, on 05.02.2025 at 10.30 am and thereafter, on the dates to be fixed by the learned Magistrate.Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that t...
MEGANATHAN Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Meganathan S/o.Karuppu Kodi, No.116/79, Vaniyambadi Main Road, Kodiyur Jolarpettai, Tirupattur District - 635 851. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 438 r/w 442 of the BNSS, to set aside the order dated 30.12.2025 made in Crl.M.P.No.4355 of 2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, at Tirupattur and consequently return the vehicle. For Petitioner(s): Mr.E.Kannadasan for Mr.R.Parthiban For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThe Revision challenges the dismissal of the petitioner's application seeking return of his car bearing Registration No.TN 91 X 0007 that was seized during the course of investigation in Crime No.361 of 2025. Page1 of 3 2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) on instructions submitted that the final order...
GANESA MOORTHY Vs The Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRAGanesa Moorthy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.State rep., by its, The Superintendent of Police, 2.State rep., by its, The Inspector of Police, Ariyalur District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita/Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the 2nd respondent police to file a final report in Crime No. 07 of 2026 dated 07.01.2026 pending on the file of 2nd respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr. D. Dayalan For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDERThe present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.07 of 2026 pending on the file of the second respondent police.A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learnedGovernment Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted ...
Syed Sahubar Ali Sikandar vs the Regional Passport Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
W.M.P.No.8065 of 2026 in W.P.No.3690 of 2026 P.T.ASHA,J., This petition is filed seeking to permit the petitioner to amend paragraph No.2 and prayer portion of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition.2. Heard both sides. Mr.L.Baskaran,learned Government Advocate appearing for the 2nd respondent has no objection to this petition being allowed. 3.Considering the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed.4. The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment. 26.02.2026 srn 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
NEELAMEGAM Vs Kuppusamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
in This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 472 days in representing the above appeal SA.Sr.No.137388 of 2024.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant(s) and perused the material available in the record.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable. Therefore, the delay in representing the above SA.SR.No.137388 of 2024 is condoned.4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. Registry is directed to list the above Second Appeal after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order. rri rri in...
R.BALAJI Vs The State Bank Of India,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA R.Balaji S/o.Late.K.Ramanathan, No.4/284, Gandhi Nagar, Genjee Main Road, Umayalpuram, Panamalai Madura, Mettupalayam, Anandhapuram Post, Vikravandi Taluk, Villupuram District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, Corporate Centre, Madame Cama Road, Mumbai 400 021.5. Datamatics Limited, Registrar and Transfer Agent of SBI Mutual Fund, ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 4PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to conduct a comprehensive verification of manual, archival, legacy and pre- computerization records relating to the savings bank account(s), deposit account(s) and safe deposit locker(s) of Late K.Ramanathan and Late R.Jayanthi at State Bank of India, Vellore Branch and to reconcile and correlate the said bank records with SBI Mutual Fund investment records including ...
DURAIYAN Vs Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Duraiyan ... Petitioner -vs- State rep.by Inspector of Police (Crime No.22 of 2025) ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, to enlarge the petitioner on Bail in Crime No.22 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police, pending investigation. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ponraj For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) *********ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 01.07.20255 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 5(1), 5(k) r/w 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 and 351(2) of BNS, in Crime No.22 of 2025 on the file of Respondent Police, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he is a neighbour ofthe victim girl aged about 16 years and taking advantage of the loneliness, he committed aggravated penetrative sexual assault r...
J.KALIYARASAN Vs The Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
W.M.P.No.8049 of 2026 in W.P.No.7474 of 2026M.DHANDAPANI, J.This petition is filed to permit the petitioners to join together and file a single writ petition.2. This petition is ordered, without separate Court fee. 26.02.2026 kkn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
R. Jayaraj Vs Ministry of Road Transport and Highways
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and WA SR No.20968 of 2026 R. Jayaraj S/o.P. Ramasamy, No.30, Shanthi Nagar, Korattur, Chennai 600 080. Petitioner Vs The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways Transport Bhawan, 1, Parliament St, New Delhi - 110001 Rep.by its Secretary and 5 others Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr. K.M.C.ArunmokanORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the applicant.2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 3 days in filing the appeal.3. Taking into consideration the period of delay and the causeshown, we are inclined to condone the delay. Application for condonation of delay is allowed. List the appeal for admission. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 26.02.2026 sasi...
PRAVEEN KUMAR Vs The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Praveen Kumar . Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.4714 of 2026 Seetharaman . Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.4725 of 2026Vs. The State represented by The Inspector of Police, B1 Police Station, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District. (Crime No.16 of 2026) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused on bail in Crime No.16 of 2026 pending on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioners : Mr.J.Prakasam For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.01.2026, for the offence punishable under Sections 103 of BNS @ 191(2), 61(2), 126(2), 87, 103, 238 of BNS in Crime No.16 of 2026, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that A1 is the sister-in-law of thedeceased...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »