Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

NEELAMEGAM Vs Kuppusamy

Neelamegam vs Kuppusamy

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 26, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1426477

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/5644/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Neelamegam

Respondent

Kuppusamy

Excerpt

in this petition has been filed to condone the delay of 472 days in representing the above appeal sa.sr.no.137388 of 2024.2. heard the learned counsel for the appellant(s) and perused the material available in the record.3. on being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable. therefore, the delay in representing the above sa.sr.no.137388 of 2024 is condoned.4. accordingly, this civil miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. registry is directed to list the above second appeal after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order. rri rri in

Full Judgment

in This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 472 days in representing the above appeal SA.Sr.No.137388 of 2024.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant(s) and perused the material available in the record.

3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed in

support of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable. Therefore, the delay in representing the above SA.SR.No.137388 of 2024 is condoned.

4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.

5. Registry is directed to list the above Second Appeal after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order. rri rri in

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Neelamegam vs Kuppusamy Same Judge Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.Thamilselvi

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales