Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
J.TAMIL ILLAKKIYA Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.Nos.4342, 4345 and 4348 of 2026 J.Tamil Illakkiya ...Petitioner Vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.2. 2. The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai-600 006.3. 3. Teachers Recruitment Board, Rep.by its Chairman, 4th Floor, DPI Complex, College Road, Chennai-600 006. ..RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 3rd respondent in publishing the ineligible list of candidates after CV for the subject Physics dated 22.02.2026 for the post of Post Graduate Assistant 2025, to quash the same as being illegal and unsustainable in law insofar as the petitioner herein is concerned and for a consequential direction to the respondent...
R. Mohanraj, Vs A. Ravi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI and CMP.No.5051 of 20251. R. Mohanraj, S/o.Ramasamy, East Street, Appellant(s) Vs1. A. RaviRespondent(s) PRAYER Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, prays to set aside the judgement and decree passed in AS No.18 of 2018 by Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ariyalur dated 20.09.2021 and confirming thejudgement and decree passed in OS.No.156 of 2013 by Subordinate Court,Ariyalur dated 12.01.2018. For Appellant(s): No Appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Kamadevan For R1 To R3JUDGEMENTWhen the matter was taken up for hearing on 06.02.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the Second Appeal was directed to be posted on 20.02.2026 under the caption for dismissal. Thereafter, on 20.02.2026, the learned counsel for the respondent advanced his arguments, and the matter was posted on 26.02.2026 for reply on behalf of the appellan...
A.KULANTHAISAMY Vs The Director of Rural Development and
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI in A.Kulanthaisamy ..Petitioner(s) Vs. ..Respondent(s) To pass an order of interim stay to stay all further proceedings of the Impugned order Na.Ka.No.45481/ 2022/DBC 2.2 dated 08.04.2025 passed by the 1st Respondent Pending disposal of the writ Petition. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Venkadesh Kumar For Respondent(s): Page1 of 4ORDERThis stay petition is filed seeking an order of interim stay to stay all further proceedings of the Impugned order Na.Ka.No.45481/ 2022/DBC 2.2 dated 08.04.2025 passed by the 1st Respondent Pending disposal of the writ Petition.2. This petition is dismissed. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/No KKN Page2 of 4 To Page3 of 4M.DHANDAPANI, J.KKN IN Page4 of 4...
RANGANATHAN Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
Crl.M.P. No. 3400 of 2026 in Crl.A. SR. No. 7740 of 2026SUNDER MOHAN,J.This criminal miscellaneous petition is filed to condone the delay of 1299 days in filing the above appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Being satisfiedwith the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay is condoned and the petition is ordered as prayed for. 26.02.2026 nv (Note to Office: Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order.) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
P.Gowrishankar vs P.Sudha
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Crl.R.C. SR.No. 7779 of 2026 Mr.P. Gowrishankar ..Petitioner Vs. Mrs. P. Sudha ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 567 days in preferring the above criminal revision petition. For Petitioner :: Mr.V.S.Senthilkumar For Respondent :: Mr.N.S. Amogh SimhaORDERThis criminal miscellaneous petition is filed to condone the delay of 567 days in filing the above revision.SUNDER MOHAN,J.nv2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, the delay is condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs.5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) in favour of The Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Madras within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thi...
M/s. Rams Pinnacle Apartment Association Vs The Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN1. M/s. Rams Pinnacle Apartment Association Rep. by its Secretary, Having its office at - New No. 37, Old No. 16, 4th Main Road, Gandhinagar, Adyar, Chennai 20 Petitioner(s) Vs1. The CommissionerGreater Chennai corporation, Rippon Building, Chennai 09 2.The Regional Joint Commissioner, South Region Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Maaligai, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore Chennai 08 Respondent(s)PRAYER To issue a writ of mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to process the Application for Demolition dated 29.11.2025 bearing Reference no. DA/ WDCN13/ 01203/ 2025 and consequentially issue Demolition permission in respect of the Apartment complex known as Rams Pinnacle situate at New No. 37, Old No. 16, 4th Main Road, Gandhinagar, Adyar, Chennai-600 020, on the basis of the Consent letters furnished by more that without insisting on production of Gen...
Nallammal Vs Velappan (Died), 1. Ettammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 949 of 2026 and CMP No.5154 of 20261. Nallammal, W/o.Boopathi, No.3/34A, Sokkan Kadu, Periyapatti Village, Namakkal Taluk and District.2. Pappathi, W/o. Subramani, D.No.3/160, Kudi Street, Chinnakarasupalayam, Sarkar Valavanthi Village, Mohanur Taluk, ..Petitioner(s) Vs Velappan (Died),1. Ettammal, W/o. Late Sengodagounder, No.3/98, Maniyarampudur Village, Thottipatti Panchayat, Namakkal Taluk and District.2. Saravanan, S/o. Velappan, No.3/98, 5th Street, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Komarapalayam Town and Post, Komarapalayam Taluk,3. Karthik, S/o. Kuppusamy, D.No.2/78D, Mettupalayam, Pillakalathur Village, Paramathi Velur Taluk, Page1 of 64. Udhiyarani, W/o. Velappan, No.3/98, 5th Street, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Komarapalayam Town and Post, Komarapalayam Taluk,5. Kalaipriya, W/o. Karthik,D.No.2/78D, Mettupalayam, Pillakalathur Village, Paramathi Velur Taluk, ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Civi...
ANTONY Vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKARAntony ... Petitioner -vs- State rep.by:The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.768 of 2025) ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.768 of 2025 on the file of respondent police seeks bail. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Ganesan For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) *********ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 10.12.2025 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 326, 303(2) of BNS and 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.768 of 2025 on the file of respondent police seeks bail.2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner joinedhands with other accused quarried illegally three bags of river sand from Balaru and the same was transported by using t...
JOHN BOSCO (B1924), Vs Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbat ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
W.M.P.No.6537 of 2026 in W.P.No.6017 of 2026M.DHANDAPANI, J.This petition is filed to permit the petitioners to join together and file a single writ petition.2. This petition is ordered, without Court fee. 26.02.2026 kkn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Sambath vs V.Velmurugan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Sambath S/o.Ponnusamy, No. 1/31, South Street, Kaikalathur Veppanttai Kaikalathur (West), Perambalur, Tamilnadu 621 117. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. V.Velmurugan S/o.Velusamy, Pillaiyar Kovil Street, Kaikalathur village, Vepanthattai Taluk, Perambalur District2. The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police Perambalur ..Respondent(s)Prayer: This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 483(3) of BNSS, to cancel the suspension of sentence and cancel the bail granted on 28.11.2025 in Crl.M.P.No. 22767/20255 in Crl.A.No. 1318/2025 and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Ms.Mohanapriya M For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Nirmal Aditya for R1 Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R2 Page1 of 4ORDERThe petitioner is the father of the victim girl in Spl.S.C.No.66 of 2019. 2.The first respondent herein was granted suspension of sentence by this Court by the order dated 28.11.2025 on t...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »