Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P.ANANDHAN Vs State by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in ..Petitioner(s) Vs State by, The Inspector of Police, AWPS, Neyveli Police Station, Cr.No.19 of 2021. ..Appellant(s) Vs State Rep By The Inspector Of Police, AWPS,Neyveli Police Station, Cr.No.19/2021. To modify the bail condition that to executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) with two sureties, imposed in Crl.MP.No.18689 of 2023 in Crl.A.No.469 of 2023, dated 25.10.2025. To call for the records and set aside the conviction and sentence imposed against the appellant on 23.08.2022 in Spl SC no. 85/2021 on the file of the Page1 of 4 Special Court for Exclusive trial of cases under POCSO act, Cuddalore District and acquit the appellant For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Pugalenthi For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate(criminal Side)OrderThe petitioner seeks modification of the condition imposed by this Court while suspending the sentence on 25....
S. Kalaiselvi Vs The District collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI S.Kalaiselvi Petitioner Vs Salem District -636 112 ...Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent by way of reply notice and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to consider the petitioner representation and select the petitioner as Anganvadi Assistant based on theguidelines issued by the 1st respondent.For Petitioner : Mr.L.Ramu For Respondents : Mr.R.V.Dinesh Rajkumar, Additional Government PleaderORDERThis writ petition has been filed praying to quash the order passed by the 3rd respondent by way of reply notice and consequently to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner representation and select the petitioner as Anganvadi Assistant based on the guidelines issued by the 1st respondent...
Jeeva P K Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1.Jeeva P.K 2.K.Priya ... Petitioners Vs. The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police ( Crime) Crime No.11 of 2026 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.11 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.Bhavani For Respondent : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDERThe petitioners herein apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 318(3), 318(4) and 351(4) of BNS,2023 in Crime No.11 of 2026, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners wereengaged as Auditors for filing GST Returns of the defacto complainant and a sum of Rs.30,61,514.19/- wa...
A. Muniraja Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.02.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED CMP.Nos.4395, 4398 and 4399 Plaintiff 2026 A.Muniraja Appellant Vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Secretary Commercial Taxes and Registration Department4. The Sub Registrar, Avadi, Chennai-54 RespondentsPrayer:- This Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, to set aside the order dated 18.12.2025 passed in WP.No.48678 of 2025, by the Writ Court and to allow the WP.No.48678 of 2025, by granting the relief sought for therein. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Om Prakash, SC For Respondent : Mr.P.Harish, GAJUDGEMENT(Order of the Court was delivered by R.Suresh Kumar, J.)1. The learned Senior Counsel for the appellant, after some arguments, wantsto withdraw this Writ Appeal, with a liberty to approach the Committee, constituted under Section 47AA of the Registration Act, by making a detailed representation, seeking for fi...
Madhankumar, Vs Vidyapriya,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE AND1. Madhankumar,2. Pandurengan, S/o.Ondachiya Pillai,3. Manoharan,4. Abhinaya, W/o.Manoharan,5. Mahendran, Page1 of 7 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Vidyapriya, D/o.Ganapathy, W/o.Madankumar, Residing at No.55A, 2nd Cross Street, Mettupangala, Kadambadi,2. Minor Aadhvika, D/o.Madankumar, Rrepresented by her natural guardian/mother Repondent No.1, Residing at No.55A, 2nd Cross Street, Mettupangala, Kadambadi, ..Respondent(s)1. Madhankumar,2. Pandurengan, S/o.Ondachiya Pillai, Page2 of 73. Manoharan,4. Abhinaya, W/o.Manoharan,5. Mahendran, ..Appellant(s) Vs1. Vidyapriya, D/o.Ganapathy, W/o.Madankumar, Residing at No.55A, 2nd Cross Street, Mettupangala, Kadambadi,2. Minor Aadhvika,D/o.Madankumar, Rrepresented by her natural guardian/mother Repondent No.1, Page3 of 7 Residing at No.55A, 2nd Cross Street, Mettupangala, Kadambadi, ..Respondent(s)To withdraw the case in D.V.C. No.33 of 2022 pend...
PRASANTH Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
Crl.M.P. No. 3498 of 2026 in Crl.R.C.SR. No. 4124 of 2026SUNDER MOHAN,J.This criminal miscellaneous petition is filed to condone the delay of 14 days in filing the above revision.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay is condoned and the petition is ordered as prayed for. 26.02.2026 nv (Note to Office: Registry is directed to number the revision, if it is otherwise inorder.)https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Devaraj Vs The State, Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Devaraj ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State, Rep by ..Respondent(s) To extension of time for furnishing the surety on Anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crl.OP.No.27137 of 2025 on 10.10.2025. For Petitioner(s): M/s.R.Vinoth Kumar For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to extend the time for furnishing the surety as per the order of this Court in Crl.OP.No.27137 of 2025 dated 10.10.2025. Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition isordered and time is extended by one week to the petitioner to furnish the surety as ordered by this Court, from the date on which, the order copy made ready. GBI To 1.The State, Rep by 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Page2 of 2...
The Agricultural Production Commissioner and Secretary vs S Arivuselva ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
C.M.P.No.2227 of 2026 in W.A.SR.No.201763 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDSHAMIM AHMED, J.(Order of the Court was made by R. SURESH KUMAR, J.) This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 84 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned Special Government Pleader for the petitioners.3. Mr.V.S.Jagadeesan, learned counsel takes notice for the respondent and he has no serious objection in allowing the petition.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. (R.S.K., J.) (S.S.A., J.) 26.02.2026 vji https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M.Abdul Lathif Vs MR. Aftab Rasool, IAS
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI M.Abdul Lathif ..Petitioner(s) Vs MR. Aftab Rasool, IAS The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai - 1. ..Contemnor(s) Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for contempt of court for having violated deliberately and wantonly the order of this Court 17/11/2025 and made in WP No.42327/2025. For Petitioner(s): M/s. I.Kowser Nissar For Contemnor(s): Mr.Avinash Wadhwani, Standing CounselORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of theorder of this Court dated 17.11.2025 in WP No.42327 of 2025.2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that theorder dated 17.11.2025 passed in the Writ Petition has been complied with.Page1 of 33. The learned counsel for the petitioner also affirmed the said submission.4. In view of t...
V.BASKAR Vs The state of Tamilnadu rep.by its,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in V. Baskar ..Petitioner Vs.1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Inspector of Police, Kairlabath Police Station, Ariyalur District.2. R. Cholarajan ..RespondentsPrayer: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 140 days in filing the above criminal revision petition. For Petitioner :: Mr.M. Jothi Kumar For Respondents :: Mr.R. Vinothraja, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1 No appearance for R2ORDERThis criminal miscellaneous petition is filed to condone the delay of 140 days in filing the above revision.SUNDER MOHAN,J.nv2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Though notice has been served on the 2nd respondent, there is no appearance on his behalf.4. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filedin support of the petition, the delay is condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs.3000/- (Rupees Three Thou...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »