Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kaliyamoorthy vs the State Rep.by the Deputy Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.02.2026Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN Kaliyamoorthy ... Petitioner Vs. State represented by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tindivanam Sub-Divison, Mailam Police Station ...Respondent Cr.No.217 of 2017 Prayer: This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking suspension of dated 30.09.2024 and release the petitioner on bail, pending criminal appeal. For Petitioner : M/s.V.Gayathri For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodaran, Addl. Public Prosecutor *******ORDER(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.) This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking suspension of dated 30.09.2024 and enlarge the petitioner on bail, pending appeal. 2 It is seen that even though charges framed under the provisions of SC/ST (PoA) Act, the learned trial Judge not found the accused guilty for the offence under the provisions of SC/ST (PoA) Act and neither the State nor the Def...
V.Dhanuskodi Ambalam, vs 1. T.N. Land Reforms
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
2026:MHC:822IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN V.Dhanuskodi Ambalam, S/o. Vellayan Ambalam, Main Bazaar Street, Pallavarayanpattim Post, Pannaipuram Via, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Madurai District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Tamil Nadu Land Reforms Special Appellate Tribunal, Chennai2. The Commissioner and Director of Land Reforms, Chennai 600 005.3. The Assistant Commissioner, (Land Reforms), Madurai. ..Respondent(s)PETITION filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the proceedings dated 27.04.2000 made in Special Revision Petition No.23 of 1999 passed by the first respondent and quash the same. Page1 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Elansezhiyan For Mr.G.Ethirajulu For Respondent(s): R1 Tribunal Mr.R.Ramanlaal, AAG assisted by Mr.T.Arun Kumar, AGP For R2 & R3.ORDER(Order of the Cour...
PREMNATH Vs Mariya Pradeep
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Premnath S/O. Ekanathan, Residing At Flat No110, Lemongraz Apartment, Kallikuppam Ambattur Chennai 600 053 President of Lemongraz Apartment Owner Association ..Petitioner Vs1. Mariya Pradeep2. Muthukumaran3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police4. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Inspector of Police, Chennai - 600 053. ..Respondent(s)PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to allow this Criminal Original Petition and issue an appropriate direction to the Station House Officer, T1 Police Station, Ambattur to comply with the order dated 30th January 2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur in Crl.M.P. No. 3483 of 2023 by registering an FIR and conducting an investigation into the petitioner's complaint. For Petitioner : Mr.C.SugumarFor Respondents : Mr.J.Kamaraj for R1 & R2 Mr.S.Santh...
R.Suresh Kumar vs the State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P. Nos.5728 and 5729 of 2025 R.Suresh Kumar .. Petitioner vs 1 The State of Tamil Nadu Rep By Secretary to the Government Erode District 638 052. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to callfor the records of the first respondent vide impugned G.O.Ms.No.39 dated 27.09.2023 issued under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land Industrial Purposes Act 1997 (Tamil Nadu Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 1st respondent and to quash the same in so far as the lands of the petitioner comprised in Survey No.226/1 measuring an extent 0.04.0 Hec and Survey No.226/2B measuring an extent 3.00.0 Hec situated at Ingur Village, Perundural Taluk. Erode District.For Petitioner : Mr.V.Kadhirvelu For Respondents : Mr.Abishek Murthy, Government Advocate for R1 to R3, R5 and R6 Mr....
AGOSH Vs The state rep.by, Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Agosh ..Petitioner Vs1. The state rep. by, The Inspector of Police, (Cr.No.203/2024)2. Melvin JR Pace Overseas Criminal Investigator, on behalf of U.S. Consulate General, No.220, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 006. ..RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records and to quash the FIR in Crime No.203/2024 on the file of respondent police and all proceedings arising therefrom, in the interests of justice, equity, and to prevent abuse of the process of law. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sathya Kumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh, Government Advocate For R1ORDERThe present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.203 of 2024, pending on the file of the first respondent Police. Page1 of 42. When the matter was taken up for hearing toda...
S.Kousalya vs the Branch Manager
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL IN CMA NO. 3328 OF 20251. S.Kousalya W/o. Late Saravanan, Res. at No.12/27, Bhuthar Street, Kumarapalayam, Kumarapalayam Taluk, Namakkal District.2. Minor S. Priyadarshini D/o. Late Saravanan, Minor rep by her guardian, mother S. Kousalya, Res. at No.12/27, Bhuthar Street, Kumarapalayam, Kumarapalayam Taluk, ..Appellant(s) Vs1. The Branch Manager Policy issuing office at 74A, Paramathy Road, Namakkal.2. The Divisional Manager Office at 1st Floor, Selvanayagi Complex, Opposite to Petrol Bunk, Near Collector Office, Perundurai Road, Erode -011. Page1 of 63. Maheswari W/o. Late Senthilkumar, Paramathi Velur Taluk,4. Deepak S/o. Late Senthilkumar, Paramathi Velur Taluk, Namakkal District.5. Raju S/o. Varuthappa Naidu, Paramathi Velur Taluk, Namakkal District.6. Saraswathi W/o. Raju, Res. at No.2/207, Malligapuram, Cauvery Road, Pillikalpala...
The Branch Manager Vs K.Suresh
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
C.M.P. No.3332 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.6032 of 2026K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.Dispensed with for the present.2. The Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same in the usual course. 26.02.2026 mps https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
P.SELVARAJ Vs State represented by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.02.2026Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN P.Selvaraj ... Petitioner Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, M-3 Kovilpalayam Police Station, Coimbatore District. ...Respondent Cr.No.229 of 2014Prayer: This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking suspension of For Petitioner : Mr.A.Abdul Lathif For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodaran, Addl. Public Prosecutor *******ORDER(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.) This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking suspension of 2 It is seen that typed set of papers are being made ready and this Court is also inclined to take up the main appeal itself for hearing and hence this miscellaneous petition seeking suspension of sentence is closed. 3 List the appeal for hearing in the usual course. [PVJ] [MJRJ] cgi To1. III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore.2. The Inspector of Police, M-3 Kov...
Babu M Vs The Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
C.M.P.No.1570 of 2026 in W.A.SR.No.8490 of 2026R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDSHAMIM AHMED, J.(Order of the Court was made by R. SURESH KUMAR, J.) This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 40 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Mr.M.Bindran, learned AdditionalGovernment Pleader accepts notice for the respondents 1 & 2 and he has no serious objection in allowing the petition. R3 though had been served and the name and the address of the third respondent has been printed in the cause list, no one is appearing on behalf of him.4. Since the delay is 40 days, having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. (R.S.K., J.) (S.S.A., J.) 26.02.2026 vji https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
G.K.Rajkumar @ Rajkumar Gopalsamy Krishnaraj Vs The State Rep. by the ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in Crl.OP No. 18623 of 2025 G.K.Rajkumar @ Rajkumar Gopalsamy Krishnaraj ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, ..Respondent(s) To relax the condition imposed in Para No. 7(C) by this Honble Court in Crl.OP No. 18623/2025 dt. 10.07.2025 and pass such other orders as this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Dinesh For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.OP No. 18623 of 2025 by order dated 10.07.2025, passed by this Court to report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI 2.When the matter was came up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent police reported that the case has been investigated and the final report is filed as a mistake of fact.3. C...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »