Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P.Bhaskar Vs The Commissioner

P.Bhaskar vs The Commissioner

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 30, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1517840

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/2067/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.Bhaskar

Respondent

The Commissioner

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 30.01.2026coramthe hon'ble mr.manindra mohan shrivastava, chief justice and the hon'ble mr.justice g.arul murugan p.bhaskar : petitionerversusvanagaram, chennai : respondentsprayer: petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no.1 namely the commissioner, grater chennai corporation, rippon buildings, (if necessary to do physical measurement) to remove the encroachment appurtenant to arulmighu sri kailasanatha temple, vangaram, chennai in accordance with law within a reasonable time frame based upon the petitioner’s representation dated 16.09.2025.for petitioner : mr.b.jagannath for respondents : mr.s.ravichandran, additional government pleader, hr & ce, for respondents 2 and 3 ms.s.vanitha joice rani, standing counsel, for the first respondentorder(order of the court was made by the hon'ble chief justice) allegation made in the petition that there are encroachments around the temple on temple lands is not supported by any specific pleading or material. therefore, on such vague pleading, we are not inclined to pass any order. it will, however, be open for the petitioner to satisfy the authorities if there is any encroachment. the petition stands dismissed. there will be no order as to costs. (manindra mohan shrivastava, cj.) (g.arul murugan, j.) index : yes/no neutral citation : yes/no tar to vanagaram, chennai the hon'ble chief justice andg.arul murugan, j.(tar)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.01.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN P.Bhaskar : Petitioner

versus

Vanagaram, Chennai : Respondents

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No.1 namely the Commissioner, Grater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Buildings, (If necessary to do Physical measurement) to remove the Encroachment appurtenant to Arulmighu Sri Kailasanatha Temple, Vangaram, Chennai in accordance with law within a reasonable time frame based upon the petitioner’s representation dated 16.09.2025.

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Jagannath For Respondents : Mr.S.Ravichandran, Additional Government Pleader, HR & CE, for respondents 2 and 3 Ms.S.Vanitha Joice Rani, Standing Counsel, for the first respondent

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Allegation made in the petition that there are encroachments around the temple on temple lands is not supported by any specific pleading or material. Therefore, on such vague pleading, we are not inclined to pass any order. It will, however, be open for the petitioner to satisfy the authorities if there is any encroachment. The petition stands dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.) Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No tar To Vanagaram, Chennai THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND

G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.

(tar)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial