Chennai Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr.R.Muthusamy vs the Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 06.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI R.Muthusamy ... Petitioner Vs1. The Government of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Principal Secretary to GovernmentParrys, Chennai-104. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents herein to consider the claim of the Petitioner and allot one post of the Veterinary Assistant Surgeons from under the category of deaf and dumb carry forward post or any other category and to pass appropriate orders within the time period as deem it fit by this Honble Court.For Petitioner : Mr.D.Senthilkumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Baranidharan for R-3 Mr.R.Balamurugan, Government Advocate for RR-1 & 2ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the Petitioner and allot one post of the Veterinary Assistant Surgeons under the category of d...
The Holy Epiphany Church, vs Rev.George Stephan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2026
C.M.P.No.21353 of 2024 in A.S.No.842 of 2010N.SATHISH KUMAR., J.andR.SAKTHIVEL., J.(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR.J.,) The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/appellant seeks permission of this Court to not press the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Considering the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as not pressed. List the Appeal on 27.01.2026. [N.S.K.,J.] [R.S.V.,J.] 06.01.2026 mrp https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
R.Suresh Vs The Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR and W.M.P.Nos.9832 & 9833 of 2021 R.SureshR.Sures ... Petitioner vs Dharumapuri District, Dharumapuri. Dharumapuri. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the third respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.217/2014/R6 dated 24.03.2021 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, stigmatic and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently directing the respondents 2 and 3 to restore the petitioner in service in the post of District Co-ordinator, Dharumapuri District under Swatch Bharat Mission (G)Phase II Scheme with continuity of service and backwages and all other attendant and other benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Sundaravadanam For Respondents : Mr.T.Chandrasekaran Special Government PleaderOR...
Dr.K.Kandasamy Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR and W.M.P.Nos.9897 & 9898 of 2021 Dr.K.Kandasamy ... Petitioner vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Principal Secretary to Government, Krishnagiri District. RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the first respondent in Letter (D). No.45 dated 12.01.2021 and to quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to pass orders for granting Voluntary Retirement from service to the petitioner forthwith, with all consequential and other attendant benefits and to pass orders.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan For Respondents : Mr.K.Tippusulthan Government AdvocateORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petitions does not survive for consideration and thus,...
N.Mohan Vs M.Thiyagarajan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.01.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN N.Mohan S/o.Nataraja Mudaliar, Door No.10, Ammani Amman Gopuram Street, Tiruvannamalai Town and District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.Mr.M.Thiyagarajan Tasildar, Tiruvannamalai Taluk, Tiruvannamalai, 2.Mr.Selvaganesh, Assistant Executive Engineer, Respondent(s) Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 28.10.2020 in W.P.No.15149 of 2020. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.D.Nandhagopal for Mr.R.Rajarajan For Respondent(s) : Mr.D.Ravichander 1&2 Special Government PleaderORDER(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The Contempt Petition on hand has been instituted to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 28.10.2020 in W.P. No.15149 of 2020. The present Contempt petition has been ...
Dr. Ganesh Korishettar vs the Union of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2026
W.M.P. No.9457 of 2024 in W.P. No.8505 of 2024M. DHANDAPANI, J.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition to permit the petitioners to file a single petition is ordered on payment of separate Court fees. 06.01.2026 (1/2) vsi2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Management, Tamilnadu Vs The Inspector of Labour
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-06-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 06-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P No. 32547 of 2016 The Management, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Limited., Head Office, Thiruvannamalai Region, Bye Pass Road, Vengikal, Thiruvannamalai. Rep. by its General Manager. Petitioner Vs1. The Inspector of Labour,Authority under Tamilnadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981, 2.R.Radhakrishnan Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the order passed by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.E/1294/2015 dated 30.10.2015 and to quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner: Mr.M.Aswin For R1: Mr.S.Senthil Murugan Special Government Pleader For R2 Mrs.V.PorkodiORDERThis writ petition challenges the order passed by the Inspector of Labour/first respondent with reference to conferment of permanen...
R.Gowthaman vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
2026:MHC:117IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN1. R.Gowthaman Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District CollectorCuddalore District, Cuddalore. 2.The Tahsildar Chidambram Taluk, Chidambaram -608001 3.The Junior Engineer (WRO) Public Works Department, Kansahib Canal Section, Chidambaram -608001 Respondent(s) PRAYER To call for the records relating to the impugned notice issued by the 3 rd Respondent dated 17.12.2025 and quash the same and direct the 1 st Respondent to provide basic amenities, such as Drinking Water, Electricity and approach road to the free house sites and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Anandakumar For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Arun Kumar, Additional Government PleaderORDER(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The notice issued by the Public Works Department, Kansagip Canal Chidhambaram, is under challenge in the present writ petition.2. Petition...
S. Ramadevi Vs U. Vasantha
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
3CMP.No.68 of 2026 in CRP.SR.No.213568 of 2025P.B.BALAJI, J.Heard Mrs. G. Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner.2. The petitioner claims to be a tenant underthe first respondent and would submit that earlier proceedings before the learned Rent Controller had culminated in a compromise. However, behind the back of the petitioner, the first respondent has initiated eviction proceedings in RLTOP No.4 of 2025 against the husband of the petitioner, who is aged about 86 years, and has obtained an ex parte decree. The petitioner therefore seeks leave to challenge the orders passed in the execution proceedings arising out of the decree in RLTOP No.4 of 2025.3. In the light of the above submissions andupon perusal of the affidavit filed in support of this petition, as well as the reasons assigned therein, this Court is of the view that the petitioner has made out a prima facie case for grant of leave to challenge the orders passed in the execution proceedings arising out of the decree in RLT...
G.Mayilvahanan Vs Tamilnadu Civil Supplies Corporation
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 05.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR G.Mayilvahanan .. Petitioner vs Road,1. Tamilnadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Represented by its Managing Director,Vilamal, Thiruvarur 613 701. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the 2 nd respondent in connection with the impugned charge memo dated 09.09.2020 bearing reference No.Na.Ka.No.E10/9283/2020 and quash the same and issue further or other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in thefacts and circumstances of the case, award costs and render justice.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Karuppasamy for Mr.S.R.Bubala Chandran For Respondents : Mr.P.Navaneetha KrishnanORDERToday when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through video conferencing submits that subsequent to filing of the present writ petition against the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 122
- 123
- 124
- 125
- 126
- Next ›
- Last »