Chennai Orders Court September 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
T.Djuraimanikkam vs the District General of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
C.M.P.No.4706 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.27304 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDHEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 445 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Despite notice has been served on the respondents and their name and address printed in the cause list, none appears for the respondents.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [H.C., J.] 01.09.2025 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
R.Radhakrishnan vs K.Palanisamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI C.R.P.No.671 of 2023 and CMP No.5292 of 2023 R.Radhakrishnan .... Petitioner Vs K.Palanisamy ... Respondent Revision filed under Sectioin 115 of Civil Procedure Code against the fair and decreetal order dated 18.11.2022 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2020 in O.S.No.38 of 2018 on the file of District Munsif Court, Sulur. For Petitioner: Mr.K.Myilsamy For Respondent: Mr.A.TamilarasanORDERThe respondent herein has filed a suit in O.S.No.38 of 2018 for the relief of permanent injunction restraining the revision petitioner/defendant, his men, agent, servant or anybody from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. The suit came to be dismissed for non-prosecution on 28.01.2019. The respondent/plaintiff took out an application in I.A.No.1 of 2020 to condone the delay of 397 days in filing the application to set aside the application to restore the suit to file. Theap...
S.Lakshmi, vs the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER AND WP NO. 8555 OF 2007 S.Lakshmi, Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Secretary To GovernmentOf Tamilnadu, Municipal Administration And Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 9. 2.The Director Of Town Panchayats, Kuralagam, Chennai. Respondent(s)1. T.R.Seshadri Junior Assistant, Town Panchayat, Ilayangudi, Sivagangai Dt. (died) 2.V.K.Lakshmi, P2 Substituted as LR in The Place OfDeceased Petitioner as per orderDt.07/04/2014 by KBKVJ In Petitioner(s) MP.No.1/14 In WP 8555/2007) Vs1. The Director Of Town Panchayats Kuralagam, Chennai 108. 2.The District Collector Sivagangai. Respondent(s)PRAYER This Writ Petition is filed seeking Writ of certiorarified Mandamus to call for the proceedings of the 1st Respondent in G.O.(1) No.426 (MAW (TP4) Department) dated 31.10.2011 confirming the order passed by the 2nd Respondent in N.K.No.10961/09/2015 dt.15.09.2009 and quash the same and consequently d...
TNEB Engineers Sangam, Vs The Tamil Nadu Electricity
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
inIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 01/09/2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.SURENDER in TNEB Engineers Sangam, Rep. by its General Secretary, 793, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. and another ... Petitioner Vs1. D.Thennarasuand another ... Respondents For petitioner ... Mr.R.Sunil Kumar For respondents ... Mr.D.Charles Muthusandan for R.1 Mr.K.Rajkumar Standing Counsel for R.2 and R3. ----- Page No:1/ inORDERThis Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to implead the petitioners/third party as the third and fourth respondents in W.P.No.30133 of 2017.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed insupport of this petition, this Writ Miscellaneous Petition is ordered as prayed for. K.SURENDER,J st 1 September, 2025 jai. Index: yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No Page No:2/ in To1. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Rep. by its Chairman, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 0022. Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation, Rep. by the Chairman/ Managing Director, He...
Ramaraj R Vs State represented by, Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on: 19.08.2025 Delivered on: 01.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRANMr.Ramaraj. R, M/48, S/o.Ramasamy, Alliance Galleria Residence, Magnus-D Apartment, No.603, 6th Floor, Block No.3, 200 ft Radial Road, Pallavaram, Chennai 600 043 ... Petitioner/29th Accused Vs. State Represented by: The Inspector of Police, EOW Head Quarters, Chennai. ... Respondent/Complainant Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to grant bail to the petitioner in the event of arrest in C.C.No.10 of 2023 on the file of the Special Court under TNPID Act, Chennai, pending investigation. For Petitioner : Mr.Rajnish Pathiyil For Respondent : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor, for Mr.M.Sylvestan John For Intervener : Mr.D.SelvamORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends the arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 120(B), 4...
CCL Flowers Ltd., Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 01.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and W.M.P.Nos.24180 & 24181 of 2018 and 31820 of 2019 CCL Flowers Ltd., Rep. by its Director, Mohammed Fareez Ahmed, S/o.Late.Mohammed Naseem, 299, 2nd Floor, Amara Jyothi Layout, Koramangala Ring Road, Bangalore-560071. ..... Petitioner Vs1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented Secretary to Government, Hosur. ..... Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India forthe issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.13635/2002/A2, dated 12.07.2018 and quash the same as illegal, incompetent and wholly without jurisdiction. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.S.Rajesh Government AdvocateORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 12.07.2018 passed in Na.Ka.13635/2002/A2, by the third respondent and seeking to quash the same.2. The learned counsel appear...
G.R. Ashok Balaji vs the Karur Vysya Bank Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI C.R.P.Nos.857 and 861 of 2023 and CMP No.6449 of 2023 in CRP No.861 of 2023 1.G.R.Ashok Balaji 2.G.Ramamurthy 3.R.Kannaki .... Petitioners in both the revisions Vs The Karur Vysya Bank Ltd., Rep by its Branch Manager, Town Extension, Mayiladuthurai Town ... Respondent Revisions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and final order in E.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2021 in E.P.No.163 of 2018 in O.S.No.72 of 2017 dated 15.11.2022 passed by the Additional Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai. For Petitioners: Mr.Mr.B.Jawahar For Respondent: Dr.R.SeyonCOMMON ORDERWhen the matter is taken up today for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that nothing survives for consideration in these P.B.BALAJI.,J sr revisions and both the revisions have become infructuous. Learned counsel for the respondent also affirms the same.2. In view of the same, both the civil r...
Nalini vs M/S. Dharan Homes,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 01.09.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR Nalini ... Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.7423 of 2023 K.Kamaraj ... Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.2596 of 2023VersusM/s.Dharan Homes Rep by its Sole Proprietor Mr.G.Dharanidharan ... Respondent in both petitions Common Prayer: Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records and quash the complaints in C.C.Nos.19 and 18 of 2019 respectively on the file of the learned Judicial In both petitions For Petitioners : Mr.M.Tamizhavel For Respondent : Mr.J.MohanmuraliCOMMON ORDERThis petition has been filed to call for the records and quash the complaints in C.C.Nos.19 and 18 of 2019 respectively on the file of the learned Judicial Page 1 / 42. The complaints initiated under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Actare sought to be quashed by invoking Section 482 of CrPC, on the ground that complaints have been falsely foisted against them...
K.Sumithra Vs The Branch Manager
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 01.09.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR W.P. No.9855 of 2023 and W.M.P. Nos.9928, 9930 and 9931 of 2023 K.Sumithra ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Branch Manager Indian Bank No.24/61, Arya Gowda Road West Mambalam Chennai - 600 0332. The Branch Manager State Bank of India Porur Branch Porur, Chennai - 600 1163. Inspector of Police4. D.Suresh Babu Inspector of Police5. Subramaniyan6. Murugavel ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarifid Mandamus, calling for the recordsimpugned notice dated 16.11.2022 letter No.1276/CBCID/OW/2022 issued by the 4th respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to de-freeze the bank accounts A/c.No.901177577 (West Mambalam Branch) Indian Bank and A/c.No.32828903299 (Porur Branch) State Bank of India of the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Balu For R1, R2, R5 and R6 : No Appeara...
P.Kavitha Vs The Inspector General of
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN P.Kavitha ...Petitioner -Vs-Coimbatore. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the third respondent in proceedings dated 17.08.2017 quash the same and further direct the third respondent to remove the entries in the Encumbrance Certificate with respect to Document No.1650/2009 and Document No.1728/2009 on the file of the third respondent.For Petitioner : Mr.I.Abrar Md Abdullah For Respondents : Mr.Abhishek Murthy Government AdvocateORDERThe writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 17.08.2017 passed the third respondent and further direct the third respondent to remove the entries in the Encumbrance Certificate with respect to Document No.1650/2009 and Document No.1728/2009 on the file of the third respondent.2. It is seen that the sol...
- ‹ Prev
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 67
- 68
- 69
- Next ›
- Last »