P.Kavitha Vs The Inspector General of

P.Kavitha vs The Inspector General of

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Sep 01, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1826573

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1826573
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan
Decided On: Sep 01, 2025
Case Number: WP/20720/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.Kavitha

Respondent

The Inspector General of

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 01.09.2025coram:the honourable mr. justice g.k.ilanthiraiyan p.kavitha ...petitioner -vs-coimbatore. ... respondents prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records of the third respondent in proceedings dated 17.08.2017 quash the same and further direct the third respondent to remove the entries in the encumbrance certificate with respect to document no.1650/2009 and document no.1728/2009 on the file of the third respondent.for petitioner : mr.i.abrar md abdullah for respondents : mr.abhishek murthy government advocateorderthe writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 17.08.2017 passed the third respondent and further direct the third respondent to remove the entries in the encumbrance certificate with respect to document no.1650/2009 and document no.1728/2009 on the file of the third respondent.2. it is seen that the sole petitioner died on 01.09.2022 itself.even till today the legal heirs did not take any steps to implead themselves as party to this writ petition. it shows that they have no interest to pursue the present writ petition.3. in view of the above facts and circumstances, the writpetition stands dismissed as abated. however, the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner are at liberty to file petition to set aside the order of abatement in accordance with law. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. there shall be no order as to cost. index : yes/no neutral citation : yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderrts to coimbatore. g.k.ilanthiraiyan. j, rts

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.09.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN P.Kavitha ...Petitioner -Vs-
Coimbatore. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the third respondent in proceedings dated 17.08.2017 quash the same and further direct the third respondent to remove the entries in the Encumbrance Certificate with respect to Document No.1650/2009 and Document No.1728/2009 on the file of the third respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr.I.Abrar Md Abdullah For Respondents : Mr.Abhishek Murthy Government Advocate

ORDER

The writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 17.08.2017 passed the third respondent and further direct the third respondent to remove the entries in the Encumbrance Certificate with respect to Document No.1650/2009 and Document No.1728/2009 on the file of the third respondent.

2. It is seen that the sole petitioner died on 01.09.2022 itself.

Even till today the legal heirs did not take any steps to implead themselves as party to this writ petition. It shows that they have no interest to pursue the present writ petition.

3. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the Writ

Petition stands dismissed as abated. However, the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner are at liberty to file petition to set aside the order of abatement in accordance with law. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. There shall be no order as to cost. Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No

Speaking/non-speaking order

rts To Coimbatore. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, rts

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties P.Kavitha vs The Inspector General of Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan