Chennai Orders Court September 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G.Muthammal @ Muthulakshmi vs V.Sivaraman (Died)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
C.M.P.Nos.13583, 13586 and 13589 of 2018 in A.S.No.365 of 1992S.SOUNTHAR,J.Heard the learned counsel for either side.2. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions, C.M.P.Nos.13583, 13586 and 13589 of 2018 are ordered. 03.09.2025 (2/4) dm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
G.Muthammal @ Muthulakshmi vs V.Sivaraman (Died)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
C.M.P.Nos.13582, 13585 and 13588 of 2018 in A.S.No.365 of 1992S.SOUNTHAR,J.Heard the learned counsel for either side.2. In the affidavit filed in support of allthese applications, it is stated by the petitioners/appellants that the sole appellant- G.Muthammal alias G.Muthulakshmi died on 11.11.2004. It is also stated that the counsel engaged by her namely Mr.S.M.Amjad Nainar also passed away and hence, steps have not been taken immediately to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant, deceased 1st respondent-V.Sivaraman and deceased 2nd respondent-Marammal.3. In view of the reasons assigned in theaffidavit filed in support of these petitions, this Court is inclined to condone the delay in filing the petitions to set aside the abatement and all these applications are deserve to be allowed.4. Accordingly, C.M.P.Nos.13582, 13585 and 13588 of 2018 are ordered. 03.09.2025 (1/4) dm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
G.Muthammal @ Muthulakshmi vs V.Sivaraman (Died)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
C.M.P.Nos.13584, 13587 and 13590 of 2018 in A.S.No.365 of 1992S.SOUNTHAR,J.Heard the learned counsel for either side.2. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions, C.M.P.Nos.13584, 13587 and 13590 of 2018 are ordered.3. The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause-title. 03.09.2025 (3/4) dm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Janab M. Abdul Wahab Vs The Director of School Education
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-02-2025
2025:MHC:2149IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN Janab M. Abdul Wahab Appellant(s) Vs DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai-600 006. 2.The District Educational Officer, Palani Road, Dindigul. 3.Dindugal Muslim Kalvi Sangam, Rep., by its Secretary Haji P.C.Nainar Mohammed Oriental Arabi Higher Secondary School Complex, District Collector Office Road, Dindugal. Respondent(s) Prayer: To set aside the order of the Learned Judge dated 28.10.2022 in W.P.No.51 of 2014. Page No.1 of 4 For Appellant(s): Mr.A.Mohamed Ismail For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Manoharan, AGP For R1 & R2 Mr.M.Mohamed Imran For M/s.Ajmal Associates For R3JUDGMENT(Judgment was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Learned counsel for the appellant made a submission that the appellant is preferring to withdraw the writ appeal and he has made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned c...
K.Mohan Vs The District Collector,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN 1.K.Mohan 2.K.Sridhar 3.N.Jayabal 4.V.Pattammal 5.V.Umapathi 6.V.Thamaraikannan, 7.T.S.Mani ... Petitioners -Vs- Chennai - 600 005. Chennai - 600 004. ... RespondentsPrayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Declaration, declaring the action of the respondents in treating the petitioners' lands in Survey No.513, to the extent of 1.46 cents in Ve1acherry Village, Saidapet Taluk, Chennai District as Government lands and consequently change of Patta bearing No.285 in favour of the Government is illegal and consequently direct the respondents to restore the patta in the name of the petitioners in respect of the above lands. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sathiyavel For Respondents : Mr.N.Naveen Kumar Government AdvocateORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission o...
S.Shashank Reddy Vs The District Registrar (Admn)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and W.M.P.Nos.2441 & 25098 of 2019 1.S.Shashank Reddy 2.C.Padmavathi 3.G.Sridhar 4.S.Vanaja ... Petitioners -Vs- 1.The District Registrar (Admn) Krishnagiri2.The Sub - Registrar, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in Proceedings No.3966/U/2018, dated 13.11.2018 on the file of the 1st respondent an quash the same as illegal, incompetent and wholly without jurisdiction and further direct the 2nd respondent to register the sale deed dated 13.08.2018. For Petitioners : Ms.V.Srimathi For Respondents : Mr.U.Baranidharan, Spl.Govt.PleaderG.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed to quash the Proceedings No.3966/U/2018, dated 13.11.2018, on the file of the 1st respondent.2. The learned counsel appearing for th...
Mr.Rajendran vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI And W.M.P.Nos.25104 and 25108 of 2019 Rajendran ... Petitioner in both the W.Ps. Vs. 1.The District Collector, Coimbatore. 2.The Tahsildar, Udumalpet, Coimbatore District. ... Respondents in both the W.Ps. 3.Ramathal ... Respondent in W.P.14034/2009Prayer in W.P.No.14034 of 2009: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Declaration declaring that the patta issued by the second respondent in favour of third respondent in respect of property belongs to the petitioner in Survey No.147/A to an extent of 2.81 acres at Kurichikottai Village, Udumalpet Taluk, Coimbatore District as null and void and nonest in the eye of law.Prayer in W.P.No.14035 of 2009: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondent from granting patta or creating any third party interest or making sub division in f...
Smt.Kala Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Kala ..... Petitioner1. The District Collector,2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,3. The Tasildhar, Kizhpannathur Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.4. S.Durairaji5. Venniyammal6. Tamilarasi7. S.Arumugam8. Gowri ..... RespondentsPrayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the Respondents, particularly the 3rd respondent impugned order dated 03.12.2018 vide Ref.No.Pa.Mu.B1/1127/2017 and quash the same, consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 restore the same earlier position, i.e. the patta in the petitioner's name for the house property bearing No.44 Anna Street, Kizhpennathur and Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai, comprised in Grama Natha Survey No.598/14 (Old S.No. 199/1) to an extend of 0.02.30 ares. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Thanjan For R1 to R3 : Mr.N.N...
R.P.Thulasinathan Vs The District Revenue Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN R.P.Thulasinathan ... Petitioner -Vs- 5.Vasantha ... Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to act upon the proceedings dated 129.11.2014 issued by the Inspector, Anti- land grabbing cell, Vellore and to verify and demarcate the boundaries of petitioner's property measuring 3.36 acres in Survey No.291, Mangalam Village, Yelagiri malai, Tirupattur Taluk, Vellore District as well as the properties mentioned in the alleged Will under which the 5th respondent has claimed her right, with the assistance of the 4th respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Subramanian For R1 to R4 : Mr.S.J.Mohamed Sthik, Government Advocate For R5 : Mr.R.Subbiah, Senior counsel for Mrs.Elizabeth RaviORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner see...
G.Sundaramurthy vs Suresh Kumar C.S
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI G.Sundaramurthy ...Petitioner Vs. 1.C.S.Sureshkumar 2.C.S.Suguna ...Respondents Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 10.11.2022 passed in RCA.No.121 of 2020 on the file of IX Small CausesCourt, Chennai (Rent Control Appellate Authority) confirming the orderdated 10.03.2020 in RCOP.No.1149 of 2017, on the file of XVI Court of Small Causes, Chennai. For Petitioner : M/s.S.H.S.ManianORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already vacated and nothing survives for further consideration in this Revision Petition.2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. jas To 1.The IX Small Causes Court, Chennai (Ren...
- ‹ Prev
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- Next ›
- Last »