Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

K.Mohan Vs The District Collector,

K.Mohan vs The District Collector,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Sep 02, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1707090

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/2508/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.Mohan

Respondent

The District Collector,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 02.09.2025coramthe honourable mr.justice g.k.ilanthiraiyan 1.k.mohan 2.k.sridhar 3.n.jayabal 4.v.pattammal 5.v.umapathi 6.v.thamaraikannan, 7.t.s.mani ... petitioners -vs- chennai - 600 005. chennai - 600 004. ... respondentsprayer:- writ petition filed under article 226 of constitution of india for the issuance of writ of declaration, declaring the action of the respondents in treating the petitioners' lands in survey no.513, to the extent of 1.46 cents in ve1acherry village, saidapet taluk, chennai district as government lands and consequently change of patta bearing no.285 in favour of the government is illegal and consequently direct the respondents to restore the patta in the name of the petitioners in respect of the above lands. for petitioner : mr.k.sathiyavel for respondents : mr.n.naveen kumar government advocateorderwhen the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the writ petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. in view of the submission and endorsement made by thelearned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs. internet : yes index : yes/no lpp to chennai 600 005. chennai 600 004g.k.ilanthiraiyan, j.lpp

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.09.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN 1.K.Mohan 2.K.Sridhar 3.N.Jayabal 4.V.Pattammal 5.V.Umapathi 6.V.Thamaraikannan, 7.T.S.Mani ... Petitioners -Vs- Chennai - 600 005. Chennai - 600 004. ... Respondents

Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Declaration, declaring the action of the respondents in treating the petitioners' lands in Survey No.513, to the extent of 1.46 cents in Ve1acherry Village, Saidapet Taluk, Chennai District as Government lands and consequently change of Patta bearing No.285 in favour of the Government is illegal and consequently direct the respondents to restore the patta in the name of the petitioners in respect of the above lands. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sathiyavel For Respondents : Mr.N.Naveen Kumar Government Advocate

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the

learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Internet : Yes Index : Yes/No Lpp To Chennai 600 005. Chennai 600 004

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

Lpp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial