Skip to content

Chennai Orders Court September 2025 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Sep 03 2025

Shanthi vs Palaniammal

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-03-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI1. Shanthi W/O.Natesan, No.4/440, Muttel Perumal Koil Road, Kallantham Village and Post, Attur Taluk, Salem District. Petitioner in both C.R.P. Vs1. PalaniammalRespondent in both C.R.P. Prayer in C.R.P.No.1844 of 2023: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under dated 13.12.2022 passed by the learned District Munsif, Sankari, in I.A.No.4 of 2022 in I.A.No.97 of 2013 in O.S.No.240 of 2002. Prayer in C.R.P.No.1845 of 2023: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under dated 13.12.2022 passed by the learned District Munsif, Sankari, in I.A.No.97 of 2013 in O.S.No.240 of 2002. For Petitioner : Mr. A. Sriram For Respondent(s): Mr. N. Manokaran -----ORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that both the parties have resolved their dispute and nothing survives for consideration in this matter. Hence, he seeks permission of this Cour...


Sep 03 2025

Kala @ Monisha Dev Kumar vs Duraisamy Nadar (Died) 1. D.Selvaraj

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-03-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR in A.S.No.451 of 1998 Kala @ Monisha Dev Kumar ... Petitioner vs. Duraisamy Nadar (died) 1.D.Selvaraj 2.D.Thiyagaraj 3.D.Ramraj 4.D.Sheela Chidambara Nadar (died) 5.C.Kanagaraj C.Palraj (died) 6.C.Jayaraj 7.C.Thankaraj 8.Krishnaraj 9.C.Jaya 10.Valli Maheshwari ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, to transfer the civil miscellaneous petition in C.M.P.No.14174 of 2023 in A.S.No.451 of 1998 pending on the file of this Court to Madurai Bench of this Court to try along with pending Appeal Suit in A.S.(MD).No.82 of 2018. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Adaikala ArockiarajORDERThis Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to transfer the civil miscellaneous petition in C.M.P.No.14174 of 2023 in A.S.No.451 of 1998 pending on the file of this Court to Madurai Bench of this Court for hearing along with pending Appeal Suit in A.S.(MD...


Sep 03 2025

I. Mariya Soosai, vs Dr. B. Chandra Mohan, I.a.S., and Another

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-03-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN I.Mariya Soosai ... Petitioner Vs.1. Dr.B.Chandra Mohan, I.A.S., Secretary to Government,2. S.Arun Raj, I.A.S.,District Collector, Chengalpattu. ... Respondents Prayer:- Contempt petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondents for wilfully disobeying the orders passed in the writ petition in W.P.No.6122 of 2013 dated 01.11.2021. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan For Respondents : Mr.S.J.Mohamed Sathik Government AdvocateORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondents for non compliance of the order dated 01.11.2021, passed by this Court in W.P.No.6122 of 2013, thereby clarified that the petitioner, who has not received compensation, is entitled for compensation under the New Act for the land acquired from him.2. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondentssubmitted that aggri...


Sep 03 2025

K. Suseela (Deceased) vs R. Nageswari

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-03-2025

in A.S.No.948 of 2014 S.SOUNTHAR,J., These Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 696 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement of the appeal, to set aside the abatement of the appeal and to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant namely K.Suseela.2. The learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent would submitthat one of the legal representatives of the appellant, who is shown as 3rd respondent is no more. The wife of 3rd respondent is already on record as 1st respondent in the main appeal. Therefore, there is no abatement of the sole appellant as far as 3rd respondent is concerned. The learned counsel for the 1st respondent would also submit that the deceased 3rd respondent has got two minor daughters and the details of the same was already furnished to the appellants.3. The death of the 3rd respondent is recorded and the 1st respondent is recorded as legal representative of the deceased 3rd respondent/K.Ravi in a...


Sep 03 2025

M.Jerome Jones Vs The Assistant Registrar (Law)

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-03-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR & W.M.P.Nos.6068, 10843, 10845 of 2022 W.P.No.5988 of 2022 M.Jerome Jones ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Assistant Registrar (Law)2. J.Jerlin3. Tmt.Pondevi4. Ruban Jaya Thilak ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records in pursuant to the Page Nos.1/7impugned order dated 23.09.2021 passed in interlocutory application in SHRC No.7743 of 2019 on the file of State Human Rights Commission, Tamil Nadu and quash the same. W.P.No.11280 of 2022 D.Rubin Jaya Thilak ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Assistant Registrar (Law)2. J.Jerlin ... RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned complaint of second respondent in SHRC No.7743 of 201...


Sep 03 2025

M/S.B.S.C.Textiles vs the Chief Manager

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-03-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI M/s.B S C Textiles, Represented by its Partner, Mr.P.Ravichandran, 14, 4th Street, Bridgeway Colony Extension, Tirupur 641 607. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief Manager, Canara Bank, P.N. Road Branch, 2.Arasi Exports, No.39, Thiruveekanagar, North Extension, College Road, 3.M.S.R. Merchants CC, 31, 14th Street, East Gate Gardens, Commercial Park, Marlbobo, Johannesburg, South Africa. ... RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the first respondent with respect tot he letter dated 11.10.2012 and Page No.1 of 3quash the same as arbitrary, illegal and unjustifiable and consequently direct the first respondent to pay back the sum of USD 29,700 to the third respondent which was illegally appropriated without any consent from the petitioner or the third respondent ...


Sep 03 2025

R.Mohana Parimala Vs Mrs. Vanitha and 2 others

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-03-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR R. Mohana Parimala ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Vanitha 2.Nithya 3.Muthamizhselvan ... Respondents Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents 1 to 3 for violating the orders of this Court in W.P.No.28495 of 2024 dated 30.09.2025 and thus render justice. For Petitioner : Mr. G. Mutharasu For Respondents : Mr. G. Velu, Additional Government PleaderORDERWhen the contempt petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr.G.Velu, learned Additional GovernmentPleader, who takes notice for the respondents would submit that the orderunder contempt has been complied with.2. Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No ATS.SOUNTHAR , J.AT...


Sep 03 2025

M/s.Bank of India, Rep. by its Vs The Joint Sub Registrar No.1,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-03-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN M/s.Bank of India, Rep. by its Authorized Officer, S.Sankaranarayanan, SME Branch, No.1(3), J.S.Arcade Park, Avinashi Road Junction, Kumar Nagar, Erode-641 603. ... Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Joint Sub Registrar No.1, 2.R.Gandhimathi 3.M.M.Palanisamy 4.K.P.Moutheeswaran 5.K.K.PalanisamyR4 & R5 are impleaded as per orderdated 06.08.2018 in WMP.17622 of 2018 in WP.No.977 of 2018 ... RespondentsPrayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, praying to call for the records relating to the Impugned Check Slip dated 22.12.2017 passed in Na.Ka. No.4568/e/2017 on the file of the 1st Respondent herein, quash the same and consequently direct the 1st Respondent herein to register Sale Certificate dated 20.12.2017 in Ref. No.ZO/CBE/ARB/SS/SARFAESI/ SALE CERTIFICATE / 2017-18/80 executed by the Petitioner Bank to and...


Sep 03 2025

K.Sailaja vs the Chief Educational Officer

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-03-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03.09.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR C.M.P.No.7348 of 2025 in W.A.Sr.No.11774 of 2022 K.Sailaja .. Petitioner Vs. The Chief Educational Officer Krishnagiri 635 001. .. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Order IV Rule 9(4) of the AS Rules, to condone the delay of 1081 days in representing W.A.Sr.No.11774 of 2022. For the Petitioner : Mr.K.Govi GanesanORDER(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 1081 days in representing the writ appeal.2. Heard Mr.K.Govi Ganesan, learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Normally, this Court would accept petitions to condone thedelay in representing on plausible reasons, but, in this case, the delay is more than thousand days, for which, though some reasons have been stated at paragraph 2 of the affidavit filed in support of this petition, we are inclined to entertain ...


Sep 03 2025

B.Sampath vs Anandan

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-03-2025

Crl.OP No.24314 of 2025 in Crl.A. SR. No. 13211 of 2025T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.Leave granted. 03.09.2025 pbl Note : Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. + https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial