Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shanthi vs Palaniammal

Shanthi vs Palaniammal

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Sep 03, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1770824

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRP/1844/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shanthi

Respondent

Palaniammal

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 03-09-2025coramthe honourable mr.justice p.b. balaji1. shanthi w/o.natesan, no.4/440, muttel perumal koil road, kallantham village and post, attur taluk, salem district. petitioner in both c.r.p. vs1. palaniammalrespondent in both c.r.p. prayer in c.r.p.no.1844 of 2023: the civil revision petition is filed under dated 13.12.2022 passed by the learned district munsif, sankari, in i.a.no.4 of 2022 in i.a.no.97 of 2013 in o.s.no.240 of 2002. prayer in c.r.p.no.1845 of 2023: the civil revision petition is filed under dated 13.12.2022 passed by the learned district munsif, sankari, in i.a.no.97 of 2013 in o.s.no.240 of 2002. for petitioner : mr. a. sriram for respondent(s): mr. n. manokaran -----orderwhen the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that both the parties have resolved their dispute and nothing survives for consideration in this matter. hence, he seeks permission of this court to withdraw these civil revision petitions. to that effect, he also made an endorsement in the court bundle.2. recording the statements and the endorsement made by the learnedcounsel appearing for the petitioner, these civil revision petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. there shall be no order as to costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. asi to palaniammalp.b.balaji, j.asi

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03-09-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI

1. Shanthi W/O.Natesan, No.4/440, Muttel Perumal Koil Road, Kallantham Village and Post, Attur Taluk, Salem District. Petitioner in both C.R.P. Vs

1. Palaniammal

Respondent in both C.R.P. Prayer in C.R.P.No.1844 of 2023: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under dated 13.12.2022 passed by the learned District Munsif, Sankari, in I.A.No.4 of 2022 in I.A.No.97 of 2013 in O.S.No.240 of 2002. Prayer in C.R.P.No.1845 of 2023: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under dated 13.12.2022 passed by the learned District Munsif, Sankari, in I.A.No.97 of 2013 in O.S.No.240 of 2002. For Petitioner : Mr. A. Sriram For Respondent(s): Mr. N. Manokaran -----

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that both the parties have resolved their dispute and nothing survives for consideration in this matter. Hence, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these Civil Revision Petitions. To that effect, he also made an endorsement in the Court bundle.

2. Recording the statements and the endorsement made by the learned

counsel appearing for the petitioner, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. ASI To Palaniammal

P.B.BALAJI, J.

ASI

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial