Chennai Orders Court August 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mr. Sajit Haridas Vs Thiru. S.Arunraj, I.A.S., and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 22.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Sajit Haridas .... Petitioner Vs 1.Thiru.S.Arunraj, I.A.S., The Collector 2.Ms.Manimehalai.P The Tahsildar Little Mount, Guindy. .... Respondents Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the first and second respondents for their willful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 10.12.2024 of this Court in For Petitioner : Mr.S.V.Pravin For Respondents : Mr.G.Velu Additional Government PleaderORDERThe contempt petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of the respondents in not complying with the orders of this Court dated 10.12.2024 in2. The learned counsel appearing on either side submitted that the orderpassed by this Court in W.P.No.34187 of 2024, has been complied with.3. Recording the same, the contempt petition is closed. 22-10-2025 Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / NoSpeaking Order / Non-spe...
Mr. Sajit Haridas Vs Thiru. S.Arunraj, I.A.S., and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 08-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Mr. Sajit Haridas S/o. Mr. K.Haridasan, C19, Nelson Chambers, 115, Nelson Manikkam Road, Amnijikarai, Chennai- 600 029. Petitioner(s) Vs1. Thiru.S.Arunraj, I.A.S., Contemnor(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.V.Pravain For Contemnor(s): Mr.P.Kumaresan Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.G.Velu Additional Government PleaderORDERWhen the earlier order was passed by this Court, this Court made it very clear that the petitioner will have to re-convey the property back to the Builder. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for petitioner sought for sometime to comply with this direction. It is made clear that the re-conveyance of the property shall be done on or before 22.09.2025. Post this contempt petition under the caption 'for reporting compliance' on 24.09.2025 at 2.15 p.m.ss To 1.Thiru. S.Arunraj, I.A.S., N.ANAND VENKATESH J. ss CONT P No. 1...
Akbar Ali, Vs The Commissioner,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.08.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE N. MALA Writ Petition No.33689 of 2016 and WMP.No.29068 of 2016 Akbar Ali ... Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner Rippon Building, Park Town Chennai 600 003. 2.The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai Police Veperry, Chennai 600 007. 3.The Chairman CMWSSB, (Chennai Metro Water Supply and Sewerage Board) Chindatripet, Chennai 600 002. 4.The Zonal Officer Zone No.VII Shenoy Nagar, Chennai 600 030. 5.The Area Engineer CMWSSB (Chennai Metro Water Supply and Sewerage Board) Annanagar, Chennai 102.6.The Assistant Commissioner of Police Kilpauk Police Station Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010. 7.Mr.Parasanraj Khanria 8.Thara Khankaria. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1, 3 to 5 to act in accordance to the complaint made with regard to misue of the premises belongs to 7 & 8 respondents ...
A.Sridhar Vs State Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-25-2025
inIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR in1. A.SridharFormerly Deputy BDO, (Panchayat), Thellar Panchayat Union, Tiruvannamalai District. Residential Address, No.131, Kalaivani Street, Gajalakshmi Nagar, Vanthavasi, Tiruvannamalai District. Petitioner(s) Vs1. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Cuddalore. Cr.No.4 of 2023. Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr.K.Shanker For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Additional Public Prosecutor inORDERThis petition has been filed to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner in Spl.C.No.5 of 2024 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate cum Special Judge for PC Act Cases, Tiruvannamalai, pending disposal of the above Criminal Original Petition. 2.It is reported that Spl.C.No.5 of 2024 has been transferred to the file of Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai in view of BNSS. 3.In view of the same, the personal...
Syed Ibrahim Vs State Rep by, The Sub Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 25.08.2025CORAM:THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Syed Ibrahim ... Petitioner ..Vs. State Rep.by The Sub Inspector of Police, Vandavasi South Police Thiruvannamalai District Crime No.156 of 2024. ... Respondent Prayer: This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 & 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the order dated 06.03.2025 made in Crl.M.P No.97 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate at Vandavasi and allow the above criminal revision. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kamesh for Mr.T.Maha Vishnu For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis criminal revision has been filed as against the order dated 06.03.2025 passed in Crl.M.P No.97 of 2025 by the learned Judicial Magistrate at Vandavasi.2. The petitioner is arrayed as A4 in Crime No.156 of 2025registered for the offences under Sections 297(1), 318(4), 61(2) BNS and Sections 5 and 7(1) of Lottery Regulation Act alleging that the ...
Govindhammal vs M.Perumal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-22-2025
These petitions have been filed (i) to condone the delay of 189 daysin filing this petition to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant, (ii) to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the sole appellant, viz., M. Nagesh, and (iii) to bring on record the petitioners 1 to 7 herein, who are the legal heirs of the deceased appellant, as appellants 2 to 8, in S.A. No.666/2022, respectively.2. The learned counsel for the respondents did not raise anyobjection in allowing these petitions and this Court is satisfied with the reasons attributed in the affidavits filed in support of the above petitions. Hence, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed.3. The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in S.A. No.666 of 2022 and list the same on 15.09.2025. [] bga bga [1/2]...
J.Parthasarthy vs S.Rajalakshmi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-22-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN T.O.S. No. 28 of 2003 and J.Parthasarathy Plaintiff Vs.1.S.Rajalakshmi 2.V.R.Krishnan(deceased) 3.V.R.Jagannathan(deceased) 4.V.R.Rajan 5.R.Priya, D/o.Late V.R.Krishnan 6.Rekha, D/o.Late V.R.Krishnan 7.T.Vijayalakshmi, W/o.V.R.Jagannathan [D5 and D6 brought on record as Lrs of deceased 2nd defendant and D7 brought on record as wife of deceased 3rd defendant and amendment carry out as per order dated 13.04.2022 in A.No.1558 of 2022 and A.No.2922 of 2022 dated 22.07.2022. DefendantsPRAYER: This Testamentary and Original Suit had been filed under Sections 232 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, XXXIX of 1925 for the grant of Letters of Administration. For Plaintiff : Mr.L.Dhamodaran For Defendants : Mr.R.Subramanian C.S. No. 647 of 2004:- 1.S.Rajalakshmi 2.V.R.Krishnan (deceased) 3.V.Jagannatathan (deceased) 4.V.R.Vasudevan (deceased) 5.V.R.Rajan (5th plaintiff is already on record...
M.S.Priyadharshini vs M.Manickavasagam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-22-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI 1.M.S.Priyadharshini 2.Minor M.P.Pugazhindiran Rep by his mother and natural guardian M.S.Priyadharshini ... Petitioners Vs M.Manickagasagam ... Respondent Petition filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code to withdraw HMOP No.926 of 2024 from the file of XXXVII Additional Principal Judge at Coimabtore and transfer the same to the file of Special Judge of Family Court at Salem. For Petitioners : Mr.G.Karthikeyan For Respondent: Mr.S.V.Pravin RathinamORDERLearned counsel for the parties are present. After the parties were referred to Mediation, the parties have been successful in reaching a settlement and have executed a settlement agreement dated 13.08.2025 in the presence of their respective counsel which reads as follows:- SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT entered into on 13.08.2025 between M.S.PRIYADHARSHINI AND M.MANICKAVASAGAM WHEREAS 1.Disputes and differences ha...
Sathya vs S.Soundar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-22-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated :22.08.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI Tr.C.M.P.No.139 of 2024 and CMP No.2624 of 2024 Mrs.Sathya ... Petitioner vs S.Soundar .. Respondent Petition filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code to withdraw HMOP No.222 of 2023 pending on the file of Family Court, Thiruvallur and transfer the same to I Additional Family Court, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Bennington For Respondent : Mr.P.SrinivasanORDERThe wife, who is the respondent in HMOP No.222 of 2023 pending on the file of Family Court, Thiruvallur, is the petitioner herein, seeking transfer of the said proceedings to I Additional Family Court, Chennai to be tried with2. Learned counsel for the respondent/husband fairly submits that therespondent has no serious objection to try HMOP No.222 of 2023 along with P.B.BALAJI.,J sr M.C.No.32 of 2024 which is pending before I Additional Family Court, Chennai.3. In view of the above, Tr.C.M.P.No.139 of 2024 is allowed and...
S.J.Selvaraj, vs the Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-22-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 22.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and M.P.No.1 of 2010 S.J.Selvaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Handlooms, Handicrafts, Textiles & Khadi (G.1) Department, Secretariat, Chennai 9.2.The Commissioner of Sericulture, Salem 636 001. .... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the first respondent in connection with the impugned orders issued by him in [i] Charge Memo in Lr.No.3893/G1/98, dated 28.05.1998 [ii] G.O.Ms.No.122, Handlooms, Handicrafts, Textiles & Khadi (G.1) Department, dated 25.09.2009 and [iii] G.O.Ms.No.123, Handlooms, Handicrafts, Textiles & Khadi (G.1) Department, dated 30.09.2009 and quash the same and direct the respondents herein to peacefully retire the petitioner from service on attaining the age o...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »