Govindhammal vs M.Perumal

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Aug 22, 2025

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1703839

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1703839
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi
Decided On: Aug 22, 2025
Case Number: CMP/19331/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Govindhammal

Respondent

M.Perumal

Excerpt

these petitions have been filed (i) to condone the delay of 189 daysin filing this petition to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant, (ii) to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the sole appellant, viz., m. nagesh, and (iii) to bring on record the petitioners 1 to 7 herein, who are the legal heirs of the deceased appellant, as appellants 2 to 8, in s.a. no.666/2022, respectively.2. the learned counsel for the respondents did not raise anyobjection in allowing these petitions and this court is satisfied with the reasons attributed in the affidavits filed in support of the above petitions. hence, these civil miscellaneous petitions are allowed.3. the registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in s.a. no.666 of 2022 and list the same on 15.09.2025. [½] bga bga [1/2]

Full Judgment

These petitions have been filed (i) to condone the delay of 189 days

in filing this petition to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant, (ii) to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the sole appellant, viz., M. Nagesh, and (iii) to bring on record the petitioners 1 to 7 herein, who are the legal heirs of the deceased appellant, as appellants 2 to 8, in S.A. No.666/2022, respectively.

2. The learned counsel for the respondents did not raise any

objection in allowing these petitions and this Court is satisfied with the reasons attributed in the affidavits filed in support of the above petitions. Hence, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed.

3. The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in S.A. No.666 of 2022 and list the same on 15.09.2025. [½] bga bga [1/2]

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties Govindhammal vs M.Perumal Same Judge Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi