Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Project Director Vs DHAVAMANI

The Project Director vs Dhavamani

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jul 25, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1821590

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/17373/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Project Director

Respondent

Dhavamani

Excerpt

c.m.p.no.17373 of 2025 in arb.appeal sr.no.68265 of 2023k.kumaresh babu,j.this application has been filed to condone the delay of 159 days in paying the deficit court fee of rs.16230 in the above captioned appeal.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.considering the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this application and being satisfied with the same, the miscellaneous petition is ordered as prayed for and the delay is condoned. gba 25.07.2025 note: registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and further directed to tag the numbered appeal along with c.m.a.nos. 3034 & 3044 of 2023 and cma.sr.nos.68264, 68266 & 62269 of 2023 and list the same in due course. page no. 1 of 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

C.M.P.No.17373 of 2025 in Arb.Appeal SR.No.68265 of 2023

K.KUMARESH BABU,J.

This application has been filed to condone the delay of 159 days in paying the deficit Court fee of Rs.16230 in the above captioned Appeal.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

Considering the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this application and being satisfied with the same, the Miscellaneous Petition is ordered as prayed for and the delay is condoned. Gba 25.07.2025 Note: Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and further directed to tag the numbered Appeal along with C.M.A.Nos. 3034 & 3044 of 2023 and CMA.SR.Nos.68264, 68266 & 62269 of 2023 and list the same in due course. Page No. 1 of 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial