Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

The Management vs the General Secretary

The Management vs The General Secretary

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jul 25, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1765696

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/4198/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Management

Respondent

The General Secretary

Excerpt

the management, metropolitan transport corporation, pallavan illam, anna salai, chennai - 600 002. ... petitioner vs. the general secretary, arasanga pokkuvarathu oozhiyar sangam, no.73/mds, inaippu citu, no.2, pallavan salai, kalaiaranga valagam, chennai - 600 002. ... respondent for petitioner : mr.r.balaji for respondent : mr.s.t.varadharajuluorderthe matter is listed today under the caption 'for being mentioned'. 2.learned counsel for the respondent submits that the name of the workman was wrongly mentioned as 'rajasekar' instead of 'raja sheriff' in the order dated 25.07.2025 passed by this court. therefore, the typographical error has to be corrected in the said order. vga 3.learned counsel for the petitioner has also acceded to the said factum.4.this court has also perused the order, wherein the name of the workman was mentioned as 'rajasekar', but, in the award itself, the name of the workman was mentioned as 'raja sheriff'. therefore, wherever the name of the workman 'rajasekar' mentioned in the above order dated 25.07.2025 passed by this court has to be corrected as 'raja sheriff'. therefore, registry is directed to issue a fresh order copy by correcting the name of the workman as 'raja sheriff' instead of 'rajasekar'.04.09.2025 vga

Full Judgment

The Management, Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Pallavan Illam, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002. ... Petitioner vs. The General Secretary, Arasanga Pokkuvarathu Oozhiyar Sangam, No.73/MDS, Inaippu CITU, No.2, Pallavan Salai, Kalaiaranga Valagam, Chennai - 600 002. ... Respondent For petitioner : Mr.R.Balaji For respondent : Mr.S.T.Varadharajulu

ORDER

The matter is listed today under the caption 'for being mentioned'. 2.Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the name of the workman was wrongly mentioned as 'Rajasekar' instead of 'Raja Sheriff' in the order dated 25.07.2025 passed by this Court. Therefore, the typographical error has to be corrected in the said order. vga 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner has also acceded to the said factum.

4.This Court has also perused the order, wherein the name of the workman was mentioned as 'Rajasekar', but, in the award itself, the name of the workman was mentioned as 'Raja Sheriff'. Therefore, wherever the name of the workman 'Rajasekar' mentioned in the above order dated 25.07.2025 passed by this Court has to be corrected as 'Raja Sheriff'. Therefore, registry is directed to issue a fresh order copy by correcting the name of the workman as 'Raja Sheriff' instead of 'Rajasekar'.

04.09.2025 vga

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties The Management vs The General Secretary Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales