Chennai Orders Court July 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India vs M/S.Ambica Processing
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31.07.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Union of India rep. by General Manager, Ordnance Clothing Factory, Avadi, Chennai 600 054. ... Petitioner vs.1. M/s. Ambica Processing Industries Ltd., 74, Jamunalal Bajaj Street, Calcutta 700 007.2. The Sole Arbitrator, Office of the Sole Arbitrator, Engine Factory Avadi, Chennai 76. ... RespondentsPrayer : Original Petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside the award passed by the second respondent dated 21.04.1999. For Petitioner : No representation For Respondent : No representationORDERThis petition is of the year 2000. There is no representation on both sides. It can be inferred that the petitioner is not interested inABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.mp prosecuting this petition. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs. 31.07.2025 Index: Yes/ NoSpeaking order / Non speaking orderNeutral citation : Ye...
Subash Chander Batra vs Sudir Batra
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31.07.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Subash Chander Batra ... Petitioner vs. Sudir Batra ... Respondent Prayer : Original Petition has been filed under Section 30 & 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 to set aside the award of the Hon'ble Arbitrator dated 21.01.1995 in O.P.No.218 of 2000. For Petitioner : No representation For Respondent : No representationORDERThis petition is of the year 2000. There is no representation on both sides. It can be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this petition. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs. 29.07.2025 Index: Yes/ NoSpeaking order / Non speaking orderNeutral citation : Yes / No mpABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.mp O.P. No.468 of 2000 31.07.2025...
Reka vs Pandian
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
in This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 115 days in representing the above CMA.SR.No.2724 of 2025.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant(s) and perused the material available in the record.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable. Therefore, the delay in filling CMA.SR.No.2724 of 2025 is condoned.4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. Registry is directed to list the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order. smn smn in...
The Administrator vs R. Ramachandran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 14-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR AND CMP NO. 3952 OF 2025,CMP NO. 4056 OF 2025,OSA NO. 59 OF 2025,CMP NO. 10915 OF 2025,CMP NO. 14170 OF 2025,CMP NO. 14172 OF 2025 (as appointed by this Honble Court) M/s. Zylog Systems Limited, Chennai - 119. and another VsR. Ramachandran S/o. R. Narayanaswamy Iyer, 101, New Saraswathi CHS Ltd, Tirmurti Marg, Chunabhatti (East), Mumbai - 022. and 2 Others CMP NO. 3952 of 2025 (as appointed by this Honble Court) M/s. Zylog Systems Limited, Chennai - 119. and another Vs R. Ramachandran S/o. R. Narayanaswamy Iyer, 101, New Saraswathi CHS Ltd, Tirmurti Marg, Chunabhatti (East), Mumbai - 022. and 2 Others CMP NO. 4056 of 2025 (as appointed by this Honble Court) M/s. Zylog Systems Limited, Chennai - 119. and another Vs Vilasrao Manikra Ghorpade S/o. Manikrao Venkatrao Ghorpade Matoshree Nivas, AT/Post Mahullu, Mahuli, Sangli 4135310 Maharashtra ...
V.Bhadra Reddy vs V.Munisamy Reddy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI AND CMP NO. 1566 OF 2024 V.Bhadra Reddy Old No.4/84 and New No.5/158, Petitioner(s) Vs1. V.Munisamy Reddy 2.V.Chinnadsamy No.64/1, Mullur Village, Sarjapura Main Road, Car Meram Post, Varathur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore-560035. 3.Nanjamma No.266, Venkapur, Bangalore, Karnataka 4.Puttamma No.261, Parvathi Nagar, Ward No.4, Bagalur Main Road, Hosur- 635 109. 5.E.Raveendra Naidu BuriSettypalli Baireddypalli Mandal, Belupalli, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh-517 432. 6.R.Ravishankar No.9/113, F4, Barani Saminathan Building, Y-Main Road, Y-Block, Town Park, Anna Nagar, West Anna Nagar, Chennai-600 040. 7.D.Gandhi No.4/63, Ramarkoil Street, Krishnampalli Village, Chandathur (B) Post, Perambur Taluk, Vellore District. 8.M/s.Prime Property Promoters Rep. by Partner S.Mathivanan, No.5, MIG Phase VI, HIG-2, Rainbow Gardens, Hosur-635 109. 9.Sridhar No.13-B, S.S.R.Layout, Vinayaka Na...
Dr.M.Saravana Kumar Vs Tamilnadu Agricultural
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR Dr.M.Saravana Kumar ..Petitioner Vs1. Tamilnadu AgriculturalUniversity, Coimbatore 641 003, rep. by its Registrar 2.The Vice Chancellor, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore -641003. 3.Dr.R.Kavitha ..RespondentsWrit Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constituion of India praying for issuane of writ of quo warranto, directing the 3rd respondent to show cause by what authority she claim to have use, handle and perform the rights/duties, privileges of the office of the Professor in Bio Energy in the first respondent University and consequently, remove her from that post and pass such further or other orders.For Petitioner(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Manikandan R1 & R2 Mr.N. Manokaran R3ORDERToday, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner, either by counsel or in person.2. Mr. S. Manikandan, learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2,submitted that t...
M.Mohamed Abbas Vs The Chief Investigating Officer,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN in Crl.A.No.678 of 2023 M.Mohamed Abbas S/o.N.Mohamed Zakariya, R/No.23, East Veli Street, Near Nelpettai Bus Stop, Madurai. Petitioner(s) Vs The Chief Investigating Officer, The Inspector of Police, National Investigation Agency, Chennai Branch, Chennai. (RC-42/2022/NIA/DLI) Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Vivekanathan For Respondent(s):Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, ASG Assisted by Mr.R.Karthikeyan, Spl.Public Prosecutor (NIA)ORDERM.S.RAMESH, J.ANDV.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.This petition has been filed seeking to relax the conditions imposed on the petitioner / appellant vide order of this Court dated 31.01.2024 in Crl.M.P.No.567 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.678 of 2023. 2.Heard both sides. 3.Considering the submissions on either side, this Court is inclined to relax the conditions imposed on the petitioner / appellant vide its order dated 31.01.2024 in ...
D. Kamaleshwari Vs A. Nithyanandan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 31.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI and CMP.No.23831 of 2023 Dr.D.Kamaleshwari ... Appellant Vs A.Nithyanandan ..Respondent Prayer : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 26.02.2021 passed in A.S.No.4 of 2019, on the file of Subordinate Court, Gobichettipalayam, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 11.01.2019 passed in O.S.No.415 of 2010 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Gobichettipalayam.For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.C.SurajJUDGMENTWhen the matter came up for hearing on 21.07.2025, none represented for the appellant. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissalon 31.07.2025. Page No. 1 of 2R.KALAIMATHI, J.kkd2. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There is no order as to costs. Consequently, connect...
T. Saravanan, Vs The Personal Assistant to the
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31.07.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR and M.P.No. 2 of 2015 T.Saravanan ..Petitioner Vs 2.N.Mohan Personal Assistant to the District Collector, 3.K.Sivasubramanian, Panchayat Secretary, Muttam Panchayat, Nagapattinam District. 4.Sembianmahadevi Pachayat Rep. by the President Sembianmahadevi, Thevoor (Via) Nagapattinam Taluk, Nagapattinam District. ..Respondents Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of writ of certiorari, calling for the records on the file of the 1st respondent in connection with the order passed by him in his Proc.No. Na.Ka.3034/Oo.Va.6/2015, dated 04.09.2014 signed on 04.09.2015 and quash the same. For Petitioner: M/s.M.Priyanga For Respondents: Mrs.R.L.Karthika, GA R1 No Appearance R2 to R4ORDERToday, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought in the writ petition has becom...
P.Prakash vs the Director General of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31.07.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR P.Prakash ... Petitioner ..Vs.. Chennai - 600 007. ... Respondents PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act praying to punish the respondents for willfully disobeying the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P. No. 30551 of 2012 dated 29.04.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.Adinarayana Rao For Respondents : Mr.J.Ravindran Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan Special Government PleaderORDERThis contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of theorder dated 29.04.2024 in W.P. No. 30551 of 2012.2. When the matter is taken up for consideration, it isrepresented by Mr.J.Ravindran, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents have already complied with the order passed by this Court referred to above and accordingly, issued proce...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »