T. Saravanan, Vs The Personal Assistant to the

T. Saravanan, vs The Personal Assistant to the

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jul 31, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1800978

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1800978
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar
Decided On: Jul 31, 2025
Case Number: WP/30610/2015

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

T. Saravanan,

Respondent

The Personal Assistant to the

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 31.07.2025coramthe hon'ble mr justice hemant chandangoudar and m.p.no. 2 of 2015 t.saravanan ..petitioner vs 2.n.mohan personal assistant to the district collector, 3.k.sivasubramanian, panchayat secretary, muttam panchayat, nagapattinam district. 4.sembianmahadevi pachayat rep. by the president sembianmahadevi, thevoor (via) nagapattinam taluk, nagapattinam district. ..respondents writ petition is filed under article 226 of constitution of india, praying for issuance of writ of certiorari, calling for the records on the file of the 1st respondent in connection with the order passed by him in his proc.no. na.ka.3034/oo.va.6/2015, dated 04.09.2014 signed on 04.09.2015 and quash the same. for petitioner: m/s.m.priyanga for respondents: mrs.r.l.karthika, ga - r1 no appearance - r2 to r4ordertoday, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought in the writ petition has become infructuous and nothing survives for adjudication in the writ petition.2. in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. no costs. index : yes/no internet : yes/no ak tohemant chandangoudar, j.ak

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 31.07.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR and M.P.No. 2 of 2015 T.Saravanan ..Petitioner Vs 2.N.Mohan Personal Assistant to the District Collector, 3.K.Sivasubramanian, Panchayat Secretary, Muttam Panchayat, Nagapattinam District. 4.Sembianmahadevi Pachayat Rep. by the President Sembianmahadevi, Thevoor (Via) Nagapattinam Taluk, Nagapattinam District. ..Respondents Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of writ of certiorari, calling for the records on the file of the 1st respondent in connection with the order passed by him in his Proc.No. Na.Ka.3034/Oo.Va.6/2015, dated 04.09.2014 signed on 04.09.2015 and quash the same. For Petitioner: M/s.M.Priyanga For Respondents: Mrs.R.L.Karthika, GA - R1 No Appearance - R2 to R4

ORDER

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought in the writ petition has become infructuous and nothing survives for adjudication in the writ petition.

2. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the

petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ak To

HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties T. Saravanan, vs The Personal Assistant to the Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar