T.Srinivasan, Vs G.Mini,

T.Srinivasan, vs G.Mini,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 27, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1832607

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1832607
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice Battu Devanand
Decided On: Jun 27, 2025
Case Number: CONT P/1726/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

T.Srinivasan,

Respondent

G.Mini,

Excerpt

.....wilful disobedience of the order dated 08.11.2024 passed by this court in w.p. no. 6757 of 2020 by the respondent.2. while disposing the said writ petition, this court directed thepetitioner to give representation to the third respondent school requesting to appoint him as b.t. assistant (history) on temporary or consolidated basis within a period of two weeks and directed the third respondent therein to consider the same and pass appropriate orders within a period of six weeks.3. during the course of hearing of this contempt case, the learnedcounsel appearing for the respondents has placed a copy of the orderdated 26.03.2025 and would submit that the petitioner submitted his representation on 05.12.2024 and the same has been considered and passed orders on 26.03.2025 rejecting the request of the petitioner, in view of the fact that there is no vacancy of b.t. assistant (history) in the respondent school.4. on perusal of the order dated 26.03.2025, this court is of the considered opinion that the order dated 08.11.2024 of this court has been complied with and as such, this contempt case can be closed.5. accordingly, this contempt petition is closed.6. however, it is open to the petitioner to ventilate his grievances against the order dated 26.03.2025 passed by the respondent in appropriate forum, if so adviced. index :yes/no neutral citation: yes/no atbattu devanand,j.at

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.06.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND T. Srinivasan ... Petitioner Vs. G. Mini, The Head Master, K.L.K. Government Higher Secondary School, Gummidipundi, Tiruvallur District - 601 201. ... Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for his willful disobedience of the

order dated 08.11.2024 made in W.P.No.6757 of 2020 passed by this

Court. For Petitioner : Ms. S. Esairani Narasimman For Respondent : Mrs. P. Raja Rajeswari, Government Advocate

ORDER

This Contempt Petition has been filed complaining wilful disobedience of the order dated 08.11.2024 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 6757 of 2020 by the respondent.

2. While disposing the said writ petition, this Court directed the

petitioner to give representation to the third respondent school requesting to appoint him as B.T. Assistant (History) on temporary or consolidated basis within a period of two weeks and directed the third respondent therein to consider the same and pass appropriate orders within a period of six weeks.

3. During the course of hearing of this contempt case, the learned

counsel appearing for the respondents has placed a copy of the order

dated 26.03.2025 and would submit that the petitioner submitted his representation on 05.12.2024 and the same has been considered and passed orders on 26.03.2025 rejecting the request of the petitioner, in view of the fact that there is no vacancy of B.T. Assistant (History) in the respondent school.

4. On perusal of the order dated 26.03.2025, this Court is of the considered opinion that the order dated 08.11.2024 of this Court has been complied with and as such, this contempt case can be closed.

5. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is closed.

6. However, it is open to the petitioner to ventilate his grievances against the order dated 26.03.2025 passed by the respondent in appropriate forum, if so adviced. Index :Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No AT

BATTU DEVANAND,J.

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties T.Srinivasan, vs G.Mini, Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Battu Devanand