Chennai Orders Court June 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Central Bank of India vs R. Selvam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN Central Bank of India China Bazaar Branch 41, Godown Street Madras 600 001. ... Plaintiff Vs.1. R.Selvam2. K.Murugaswamy3. K.Panneerselvam ...DefendantsPrayer : Petition filed under Order XXXIV Rule 1 and Rules 150 of CPC and Section 16 of CPC read with Order IV Rule 1 read with Order XXXVII Rule 1 of OS Rules, to pass a Judgment and Decree by a) directing the defendants 1 to 3 to pay the plaintiff the sum of Rs.3,52,124.90 with future interest at 12.5% per annum with quarterly rests from the date of plaint till the date of realisation; b) directing that in default of such payment, on the date to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court the property described in Schedule 'A' hereunder i.e., For Truck bearing Registration No. TME5760 hypothecated to the bank, to be sold and the proceeds after deducting the expenses of sale, applied towards payment of the decree amount togethe...
Ayyanar vs P.Karuppan @ Karupannan(Died)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-06-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI CMP NO.4557 of 2021 in SA SR NO.2211 OF 2021 1.Ayyanar 2.Palanisamy .. Petitioners Vs. P.Karuppan @ Karupannan (Died) Sambar @ Ayyanar (Died) 1.Lakshmi 2.Palaniyammal 3.Govindammal 4.Chakravarthi @ Palanisamy 5.V.Murugan 6.R.Palaniyammal .. Respondents Prayer : This petition is filed under Order 41 Rule 3 A r/w Order 42 Rule 1 of C.P.C., to condone the delay of 52 days in preferring the present Second Appeal. For Petitioners : Mr.Udayakumar For R1, R2, R4 & R5 : No Appearance For R3 : Not ready in noticeORDERThis petition has been filed to condone the delay of 52 days in preferring the above second appeal.R.KALAIMATHI, J.kkd2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.3. Accepting the averments made in the petition, this petition shall standallowed on payment of costs of Rs.500/- payable in favour of the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, Chennai on or before 14.07.20...
M/S.Chithirala Subramaniam vs R.Jayakumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-06-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN A No.539 of 2025 in C.S.No.481 of 2000 M/s.Chithirala Subramaniam Chetty Foundation And Another and 2 Others Applicant(s) Vs R.Jayakumar All at No.75, Dr.Alagappa Road, Chennai 600084. and 2 Others Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr.M.Devendran For Respondent(s): Mr.K.ChandrasekaranORDERThis application has been filed to implead the son of the second defendant as the third defendant in the suit.2. The second defendant has described himself as the President andTrustee of the first defendant Trust. It is contended that he had co-opted his son who is now proposed to be impleaded as a further defendant as a trustee and therefore, the application has been filed to implead his son as a further defendant.3. Counter affidavit had been filed questioning this application and also raising objections about the resolution which had been passed.4. Any issue relating to co-opting a further truste...
K.N.Solairajan vs the State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH K.N.Solairajan Rep.by his Power of Attorney C.Venkatasubbu 15-B, Ayyanar Koil Street Annuppanady, Madurai 625 009. . Petitioner -Vs- 5.Tmt.S.Selvarani 6.P.N.Raja .. Respondents (R5 & R6 impleaded as per Court order dated 07.01.2009 in MP.No.3/2007 in WP.No.32157/2007 by RBIJ)Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Declaration declaring the condition in clause (h) of Sub Rule (2) of old Rule 8 B and in clause (g) of Sub Rule 9 of new Rule 8A TNMMC Rules 1959 inserted by G.O.Ms.1273 Industries Dept. (H1) dt 9.12.88 and G.O.Ms.No.608 Industries Dept. (MMCII) dt 2.9.1989 respectively as ultra virus of section 15 of MMRD Act 1957 for want of legislative competency of the State and consequently to issue the transport permit to move the extracted granite blocks from the quarry site in S.Nos.167/1 and 94/2 in Thiru...
The Tamilnadu Electricity vs the Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Pensioners Welfare Organization, Rep. by its General Secretary, No.27, Mosque Street, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by Secretary to Government, Fort St.George, Chennai.2. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Rep. by its Secretary, No.800, X Floor, K.R.R Maligai, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner and consequently convert 50% of Dearness Allowance as Dearness Pension with effect from 01.01.2006 instead of 01.08.2006 for the members of the Petitioner Association as in the case of other Government Pensioners and pay the arrears to the members of the petitioner Association due from 01.01.2006 to 01....
K. Premkumar vs State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and M.P.No.1 of 2006 K.Premkumar ... Petitioner Vs. Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Chennai 600 009. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of certiorari, calling for the records of the respondent herein relating to the Show Cause Notice issued to the petitioner in letter No.S.C./4024-15/03 Home (SC) Department dated 01-09-2006 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Ms.Narmadha Sampath For Respondent : Mr.V.Nanmaran Additional Government PleaderORDERThis writ petition has been filed seeking writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned show cause notice vide letter No.SC/4024- to why the penalty of removal from service, specified in Rule 8 of the Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, shall not be imposed on him.2. From the perusal of the record, it is noti...
S.Selvarani vs the Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH 1.Tmt.S.Selvarani 2.P.N.Raja . Petitioners -Vs- 7.K.N.Solairajan 8.C.Venkatasubbu Power Agent of K.N.Solairajan 9.K.Yusuff Basha, KMB Granites (P) Ltd., Five Roads, Salem-636 004. 10.K.Haneef Basha .. Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 5th respondent herein to collect the evaded sales tax amount from the 7th and 8th respondents as per procedure established by law. For Petitioner : Mrs.M.Padmavathy For Respondents : Mr.E.Vedabagathsingh Special Government Pleader for R1 to R6 No appearance for R7 to R10ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Index : Yes/No NCS : Yes/No KP ToN.ANAND VENKATESH, J.KP...
S.Selvarani vs the Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH 1.Tmt.S.Selvarani 2.P.N.Raja . Petitioners -Vs- 7.K.N.Solairajan 8.C.Venkatasubbu Power Agent of K.N.Solairajan 9.K.Yusuff Basha, KMB Granites (P) Ltd., Five Roads, Salem-636 004. 10.K.Haneef Basha .. Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 4th respondent not to issue permits to respondents 7 and 8, till they set up three industries each worth Rs.85 lakhs to the satisfaction of the 1st respondent as per the industrial programme submitted by them before the Committee on 11.11.2002. For Petitioner : Mrs.M.Padmavathy For Respondents : Mr.E.Vedabagathsingh Special Government Pleader for R1 to R6 No appearance for R7 to R10ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Index...
V.Subramani vs State Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-06-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY1. V.Subramani S/o.Velayutham Appellant(s) Vs1. State Rep. By Inspector Of Police, SPE/CBI/ACB,/Chennai RC.No.25(A)/1989 And RC.No.32(A)/1989 SPE/CBI/ACB/Chennai Respondent(s)PRAYER To set aside the conviction and sentence passed in C.C.No.7 of 2005, dated 30.06.2015 on the file of the IInd Additional District Judge, (CBI Cases), Coimbatore. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Ramkumar For Respondent: Mr.K.Srinivasan Special Public Prosecutor (CBI cases)ORDEROn the last occasion itself, it was represented that the appellant had since died. The matter was adjourned with instructions to the prosecution to verify. Today also, the prosecution could not verify the death of the appellant. However, the accused, who is the appellant in the connected Criminal Appeal No.425 of 2015, submits that the appellant herein has since died. The learned counsel also earlier represented that the appellant had ...
The Management of Vs S.Thangavel
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 30.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and WMP.No.4880 of 2023The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbatore Division) Limited No.37, Mettupalayam Road Coimbatore - 641 043. ... Petitioner Vs. S.Thangavel ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the Award in C.P.No.44 of 2021 dated 12.07.2022 on the file of the Additional Labour Court, Coimbatore and quash the same.For Petitioner : Mr.T.Chandrasekaran For Respondent : Ms.V.PorkodiORDERThe above writ petition arise against the order passed by the Additional Labour Court, Coimbatore, in C.P.No.43 of 2021.2. The short facts are as follows :a) The respondent herein was a driver under the petitioner- Management. He joined the Udumalpet branch of the petitioner-Corporation on 07.04.1998 on a daily wage of Rs.75/-. The respondent would sub...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »