Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

V.Subramani vs State Rep. by

V.Subramani vs State Rep. by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 30, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1755879

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL A/428/2015

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V.Subramani

Respondent

State Rep. by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 30-06-2025coramthe honourable mr.justice d.bharatha chakravarthy1. v.subramani s/o.velayutham appellant(s) vs1. state rep. by inspector of police, spe/cbi/acb,/chennai rc.no.25(a)/1989 and rc.no.32(a)/1989 spe/cbi/acb/chennai respondent(s)prayer to set aside the conviction and sentence passed in c.c.no.7 of 2005, dated 30.06.2015 on the file of the iind additional district judge, (cbi cases), coimbatore. for petitioner : mr.c.ramkumar for respondent: mr.k.srinivasan special public prosecutor (cbi cases)orderon the last occasion itself, it was represented that the appellant had since died. the matter was adjourned with instructions to the prosecution to verify. today also, the prosecution could not verify the death of the appellant. however, the accused, who is the appellant in the connected criminal appeal no.425 of 2015, submits that the appellant herein has since died. the learned counsel also earlier represented that the appellant had died.2. in view thereof, the criminal appeal is dismissed as having abated. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed. gd neutral citation:yes/no to 1.state rep. by inspector of police, spe/cbi/acb, chennai rc.no.25(a)/1989 and rc no.32(a)/1989 spe/cbi/acb/chennai d.bharatha chakravarthy j. gd

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30-06-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

1. V.Subramani S/o.Velayutham Appellant(s) Vs

1. State Rep. By Inspector Of Police, SPE/CBI/ACB,/Chennai RC.No.25(A)/1989 And RC.No.32(A)/1989 SPE/CBI/ACB/Chennai Respondent(s)

PRAYER To set aside the conviction and sentence passed in C.C.No.7 of 2005, dated 30.06.2015 on the file of the IInd Additional District Judge, (CBI Cases), Coimbatore. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Ramkumar For Respondent: Mr.K.Srinivasan Special Public Prosecutor (CBI cases)

ORDER

On the last occasion itself, it was represented that the appellant had since died. The matter was adjourned with instructions to the prosecution to verify. Today also, the prosecution could not verify the death of the appellant. However, the accused, who is the appellant in the connected Criminal Appeal No.425 of 2015, submits that the appellant herein has since died. The learned counsel also earlier represented that the appellant had died.

2. In view thereof, the criminal appeal is dismissed as having abated. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed. gd Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.State Rep. By Inspector Of Police, Spe/cbi/acb, Chennai Rc.No.25(a)/1989 And Rc No.32(a)/1989 Spe/cbi/acb/chennai D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY J. gd

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial