Chennai Orders Court February 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Animuthu vs State Rep.by, the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in1. Animuthu2. Kathir @ Kathiravan Petitioner(s) Vs Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.N. Arun Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition in para No.5(c) imposed on the petitioners herein in Crl.O.P.No.525 of 2025, dated 22.01.2025, that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police everyday at 06:30 p.m., until further orders.SUNDER MOHAN, J.stn2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioners have been complying with the condition regularly and the investigation is pending.3. Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature ofoffence, the condition in para No.5(c) imposed on the petitioners herein in Crl.O.P.No.525 of 2025, dated 22.01.2025, is relaxed to the effect that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and...
Mallai Aadhama Trust Vs The Director of Town
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.02.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD and 1 Mallai Aadhama Trust Rep By Managing Trustee, D.No.26, Sengunthar Maligai Santaipet, Vayappamalai Main Rd, Mallasamuthram Po, Tiruchengode Tk, Namakkal Dt-637503 ... PETITIONER Vs Tiruchengode Tauk, Namakkal District. .. RESPONDENTS PRAYER: The writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent 21.03.2018 made in Na.Ka. No.7965/ 2016/ U5 and to quash the same. Consequently, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to permit the petitioner to maintain the continuous situate at Vaiyappamalai Main Road Ward No.1 Survey No.272/6 Mallasamuthiram Village, Tiruchengode Taluk Namakkal District. For Petitioner ... Mr.C.Prabakaran For Respondent ... Ms.R.L.Karthika Nos.1 to 3 Government Advocate For Respondent ... Mr.S.Kumar ...
Amaran @ Bharathiraja vs State Rep by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Amaran @ Bharathiraja Petitioner(s) Vs Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K. Gopinath For Respondent(s) : Mr. Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed seeking to amend the satisfaction Court as Judicial Magistrate, Avinashi (Tirupur District) instead of Judicial Magistrate, Tiruppur in Crl.O.P.No.3020 of 2025 dated 07.02.2025.SUNDER MOHAN, J.stn2. In view of the averments adduced in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, this petition is ordered as prayed for. The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in Crl.O.P.No.3020 of 2025 dated 07.02.2025 and issue fresh order copy.3. Further, time is extended for a further period of two weeks fromthe date of receipt of fresh order copy, to comply with the conditions imposed on the petitioner, by this Court vide order dated 07.02.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.3020 of 2025....
Datchanamoorty vs State Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 28.02.2025CORAM:THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHANDatchanamoorthi S/o. Velusamy ... Petitioner / Accused Vs State rep. by:- The Inspector Of Police, Peelamedu Police Station, Coimbatore District. ... Respondent [Cr. No.686 of 2024] PRAYER: - The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S., praying to extend the time for executing sureties and to comply the conditions as per the order dated 17.01.2025 made in Crl. O.P. No.1293 of 2025. For Petitioner : Mr. R. Parthiban For Respondent : Mr. S. Santhosh, Government Advocate [Criminal side]ORDERThis petition has been filed to extend the time for executing the sureties as per the order of this Court in Crl O.P. No1293 of 2025 dated 17.01.2025.2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petitionis ordered and time is extended upto two weeks to the petitioner to execute the sureties and to comply the conditions as ordered by this ...
Pazhamalai vs State Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.02.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR and Crl.M.P.No.2896 of 2025 Pazhamalai ... Petitioner/AccusedVersusState Rep by The Inspector of Police, Jayankondam, Ariyalur District. (Cr.No.25 of 2024) ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Revision filed under Sections 438 r/w 442 of BNSS, praying to call for the records and set aside the order passed in M.P.No.1 of 2025 in S.C.No.69 of 2024 dated 29.01.2025 by the Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Ariyalur. For Petitioner : Ms.K.Shalini For Respondent : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public ProsecutorORDERToday, the matter is listed under the caption For Withdrawal based Page No.1 of 3 on the letter dated 27.02.2025 submitted by the learned counsel appearing for Page No.2 of 3M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.rsi the petitioner to the Registry. The learned counsel for petitioner also sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Revision and she made an endorsement in t...
Vijaykumar vs the State Rep. by, Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Vijay Kumar Petitioner(s) Vs Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K. Karthikeyan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition in para No.9(b) imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.31900 of 2024, dated 20.12.2024, that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 06:30 p.m., until further orders.SUNDER MOHAN, J.stn2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly and the investigation is pending.3. Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature ofoffence, the condition in para No.9(b) imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.31900 of 2024, dated 20.12.2024, is relaxed to the effect that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.4. Ac...
Suriya Vs The State Rep by,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Suriya Petitioner(s) Vs The Inspector of Police,Manaval Nagar Police Station. (Cr.No. 342 of 2024) Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. Aswin For Respondent(s) : Mr. Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed seeking to amend the surety to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvallur instead of surety to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Arakonam in Crl.O.P.No.1036 of 2025 dated 21.01.2025.SUNDER MOHAN, J.stn2. In view of the averments adduced in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, this petition is ordered as prayed for. The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in Crl.O.P.No.1036 of 2025 dated 21.01.2025 and issue fresh order copy.3. Further, time is extended for a further period of two weeks fromthe date of receipt of fresh order copy, to comply with the conditions imposed on ...
Basker @Babu vs the State Represented by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Basker @ Babu Petitioner(s) Vs The State Represented By Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. W. Camyles Gandhi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition in para No.6(a) imposed on the petitioner herein in Crl.O.P.No.32347 of 2024, dated 21.01.2025, that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 06:30 p.m., until further orders.SUNDER MOHAN, J.stn2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly and the investigation is pending.3. Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature ofoffence, the condition in para No.6(a) imposed on the petitioner herein in Crl.O.P.No.32347 of 2024, dated 21.01.2025, is relaxed to the effect that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police ...
Harish vs State Rep by Its
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in HARISH Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep By Its Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. U. Ganesh Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.18827 of 2024 in Crl.O.P.No.28201 of 2024, dated 21.12.2024, that the petitioner shall report before the respondent every Saturday at 10:30 a.m., until further orders.SUNDER MOHAN, J.stn2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly and charge sheet filed.3. Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature ofoffence, the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.18827 of 2024 in Crl.O.P.No.28201 of 2024, dated 21.12.2024, is relaxed to the effect that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when requir...
Muthu Sivalingam vs State Rep by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Muthu Sivalingam Petitioner(s) Vs Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P. Krishnan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition in para No.4(b) imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.2081 of 2025, dated 29.01.2025, that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10:30 a.m., until further orders.SUNDER MOHAN, J.stn2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly and the investigation is pending.3. Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature ofoffence, the condition in para No.4(b) imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.2081 of 2025, dated 29.01.2025, is relaxed to the effect that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.4. Ac...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »