Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Suriya Vs The State Rep by,

Suriya vs The State Rep by,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 28, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1791270

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP/3545/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Suriya

Respondent

The State Rep by,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 28-02-2025coramthe honourable mr justice sunder mohan in suriya petitioner(s) vs the inspector of police,manaval nagar police station. (cr.no. 342 of 2024) respondent(s) for petitioner(s) : mr. m. aswin for respondent(s) : mr. leonard arul joseph selvam, government advocate (crl. side)orderthis petition has been filed seeking to amend the surety to the satisfaction of judicial magistrate, thiruvallur instead of surety to the satisfaction of judicial magistrate no.ii, arakonam in crl.o.p.no.1036 of 2025 dated 21.01.2025.sunder mohan, j.stn2. in view of the averments adduced in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, this petition is ordered as prayed for. the registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in crl.o.p.no.1036 of 2025 dated 21.01.2025 and issue fresh order copy.3. further, time is extended for a further period of two weeks fromthe date of receipt of fresh order copy, to comply with the conditions imposed on the petitioner, by this court vide order dated 21.01.2025 in crl.o.p.no.1036 of 2025. 28.02.2025 stn to the inspector of police, manaval nagar police station. (cr.no. 342 of 2024) in

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28-02-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Suriya Petitioner(s) Vs The Inspector of Police,Manaval Nagar Police Station. (Cr.No. 342 of 2024) Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. Aswin For Respondent(s) : Mr. Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking to amend the surety to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvallur instead of surety to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Arakonam in Crl.O.P.No.1036 of 2025 dated 21.01.2025.

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

stn

2. In view of the averments adduced in the affidavit filed in support

of the petition, this petition is ordered as prayed for. The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in Crl.O.P.No.1036 of 2025 dated 21.01.2025 and issue fresh order copy.

3. Further, time is extended for a further period of two weeks from

the date of receipt of fresh order copy, to comply with the conditions imposed on the petitioner, by this Court vide order dated 21.01.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.1036 of 2025. 28.02.2025 stn To The Inspector of Police, Manaval Nagar Police Station. (Cr.No. 342 of 2024) in

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial