Chennai Orders Court February 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.Venkatachalam, Vs Mr. Elangovan,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.02.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH R.Venkatachalam ... Petitioner Vs. Mr.Elangovan Salem 636 007. ... Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed u/s.11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.3889 of 2023 dated 10.02.2023 as per the Contempt of Court Act. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Desinghu For Respondent : Mr.K.Raja Standing CounselORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed praying to punish the respondent for wilfully disobeyed the orders passed in W.P.No.3889 of 2023 dated 10.02.2023. N.ANAND VENKATESH, J ssr 2.When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the calculation memo was filed on behalf of the respondent. 3.On going through the same, it is clear that the order passed by this Court has been complied with. This fact was also confirmed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4.Recording the above, the contem...
Mr.V.Murugan, vs the Principal [Deleted]
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.02.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI and M.P.Nos.2 of 2010 & 1 of 2012V.Murugan ... Petitioner in both WPs Vs. 1.The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. [R1 deleted vide order dt. 11.04.2016 in M.P.No.1 of 2024 in W.P.No.13938 of 2010] 2.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Ellilazham, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. 3.The Commissioner, Pollachi Municipality, Pollachi 642 001, Coimbatore District. 4.P.Mahalingam ... Respondents in W.P.No.13938 of 2010 5.The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Page No.1 of 10Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. 6.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Ellilazham, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. 7.The Commissioner, Pollachi Municipality, Pollachi 642 001, Coimbatore District. 8.P.Mahalingam 9.K.Sundarammal ... Res...
K.Sathishkumar Vs The Management of
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
1 WP No. 20091 of 2018IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No. 20091 of 20181. K.Sathishkumar S/o. Krishnamoorthi, No. 5/ 804, F3, 3rd Cross Street, Sivakumar Nagar, Hosur, Krishnagiri District Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Management ofM/s. Sundaram Auto Components Ltd., Rubber Division, Belagondapalli, Hosur, Krishnagiri District 2.The Management of Mega Rubber Technologies Ltd., Belagondapalli, Hosur, Krishnagiri District Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari Mandamus Calling for the records of impugned award passed in I.D. NO. 9 of 2014 dated 24.10.2017 which was communicated vide 2 WP No. 20091 of 2018 letter dated 16.03.2018 by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Salem, and quash the same, consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to reinstate the petitioner into service with all service benefits including continuity of service. Fo...
R.Nagarajan vs State Rep by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in R. Nagarajan Petitioner(s) Vs Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. Sathya Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.16762 of 2024 in Crl.O.P.No.25226 of 2024, dated 28.11.2024, that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on first and third Saturday of every month at 10:30 a.m., until further orders.SUNDER MOHAN, J.stn2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly and the investigation is pending.3. Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature ofoffence, the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.16762 of 2024 in Crl.O.P.No.25226 of 2024, dated 28.11.2024, is relaxed to the effect that the petitioner shall report before the re...
N.Janakam vs Gopal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.02.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM Contempt Petition No.2083 of 2015 N.Janakam .. Petitioner v. Mr.Gopal The Manager Sales & Services Tamil Nadu Housing Board Thirumazhiesai Satellite City Division 792, T.K.S.B.M. Tower (First Floor) Trunk Road, Poonamallee Chennai 600 056 .. Respondent Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order dated 06.03.2015 made in M.P.No.1 of 2015 in W.P.No.6109 of 2015. For Petitioner :: Mr.J.R.K.Bhavanantham For Respondent :: Mr.D.Veerasekaran Standing Counsel for TNHBORDERThe learned counsel for petitioner submits that the grievances raised by the petitioner are redressed. Recording his statement, the contempt petition stands closed. Index : yes/no 28.02.2025 Neutral citation : yes/no ssS.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.ss 28.02.2025...
Dr. Mahalakshmi Rangabashyam Vs Mrs. Chitralekha Rangabashyam and anot ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Dr. Mahalakshmi Rangabashyam W/o.Mr.Bharath Shetty, No.17, Gilchrist Avenue, Chennai 600 031. Applicant(s) Vs Mrs. Chitralekha Rangabashyam and another Late Prof.N.Rangabashyam, 9/19, Seethamma Colony, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018. and another Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): M/s. Rajagopal Vasudevan R.Murugan M.Sathish M.Ellakkiya P.Tamizh Vendan T.M.Ansel Lewis Charumathi J.L. For Respondent(s):ORDERIn a proposed suit seeking declaratory and for a direction, the intending plaintiff seeks leave to sue the second respondent/ defendant before this Court. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. 3.Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the substantial portion of the cause of action for the suit arose within the jurisdiction of this Court.4.Upon considering the above submissions and examining the draft plaint and the affidavit filed in support of this Applicat...
J.Jayapaul Mohan vs J. Sam David
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.02.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and Crl.M.P.No.3671 of 2025 J.Jayapaulmohan ... Petitioner Vs1. J.Sam David2. State of Tamil NaduRepresented By, The Inspector of Police (L and O), Chennai - 600 023. ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to set aside the order dated 30.12.2024 passed by the XXVI Metropolitan Magistrate Judge, Egmore in Crl.M.P.No.73491 of 2024 in STC.No.9417 of 2023 and to allow the Crl.O.P.No.SR.5442 of 2025. For Petitioner : Mr.T.S.Kani For R2 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate (Crl.side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 30.12.2024 passed by the XXVI Metropolitan Magistrate Judge, Egmore in Crl.M.P.No.73491 of 2024 in STC.No.9417 of 2023 and to allow the Crl.O.P.No.SR.5442 of 2025.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) fo...
S.Revathy, Vs The District Revenue Officer,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH AND1. S.Revathy, No.2/116, Santhaimedu Street, Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District Revenue Officer, Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chengalpet, Kancheepuram District 3.The Tasildhar, Chengalpet 4.Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd (tansidco), Rep By Its Branch Manager, Thirumudivakkam, Chennai 44 5.J.Vasudevan No.1/43, Santhaimedu Street, 6.J.Indrani, No.2/95, Santhaimedu, Singaperumal Koil, Chengalpet Taluk, Kancheepuram District 603 204 7.M.Mareeswari, No.3/81a, Mandapa Street, 8.N.Anandhan, Shop No.2, Santhaimedu Street, Respondent(s)1. J.Vasudevan No.1/43, Santhaimedu Street, 2.J.Indrani, No.2/95, Santhaimedu, Singaperumal Koil, Chengalpet Taluk, Kancheepuram District 603 204 3.M.Mareeswari, No.3/81A, Mandapa Street, 4.S.Revathy, No.2/116, Santhaimedu Street,5.T.Srinivasan, No.6, Bharathiar Street, Thirukachur Village, Ch...
J.Devi vs P.Saravanan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
C.M.P.No.4518 of 2025 in C.R.P.Sr.No.129556 of 2023 P.T.ASHA, J., This petition is filed to condone the delay of 114 days in representing the above C.R.P.Sr.No.129556 of 2023.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Being satisfied with thereasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 114 days in representing the above appeal in C.R.P.Sr.No.129556 of 2023 is condoned. 28.02.2025 srn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Balaji vs the State Represented by, the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.02.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and Crl.M.P.No.2273 of 20251. Balaji2. R.Selvam3. Chelladurai4. Abudul Rahman5. Jagan ... Petitioners Vs The State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Crime No.206 of 2018. ... RespondentCriminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records culminating in Crl.M.P.No.239 of 2025 in C.C.No.21 of 2023 on the fie of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Additional Special Court for Trial of Criminal cases related to Elected Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assembly of Tamil Nadu, Chennai, set aside the same.For Petitioners : Mr.B.Mohan For Respondent : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioners had already been acquitted in C.C. No. 21 of 2023. Therefore, nothing survives for further co...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »