K.Sathishkumar Vs The Management of

K.Sathishkumar vs The Management of

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 28, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1744455

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1744455
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani
Decided On: Feb 28, 2025
Case Number: WP/20091/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.Sathishkumar

Respondent

The Management of

Excerpt

.....of india for issuance of a writ of certiorari mandamus calling for the records of impugned award passed in i.d. no. 9 of 2014 dated 24.10.2017 which was communicated vide 2 wp no. 20091 of 2018 letter dated 16.03.2018 by the presiding officer, labour court, salem, and quash the same, consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to reinstate the petitioner into service with all service benefits including continuity of service. for petitioner(s): mr. balan haridas for m/s.m.r.jothimanian for respondent(s): mr. sanjay mohan for m/s.s.ramasubramaniam and associates for r1 ms. v. pavithra, for m/s. v.srimathi, for r2orderthis writ petition has been filed seeking to quash the award passed in i.d. no. 9 of 2014 dated 24.10.2017 by the presiding officer, labour court, salem, and to consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to reinstate the petitioner into service with all service benefits including continuity of service.2. the learned counsel for the petitioner reported no instructions.3. the learned counsel for the first respondent submitted that during thependency of this writ petition the petitioner received the award amount along with the interest of rs.3,53,163/-. hence, no further adjudication is necessary in this writ petition. 3 wp no. 20091 of 20184. in view of the above, this writ petition is closed. no costs. consequently, connected, miscellaneous petition is closed. 28-02-2025 rap index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no 4 wp no. 20091 of 2018 to the presiding officer, labour court, salem 5 wp no. 20091 of 2018 m.dhandapani j. rap wp no. 20091 of 2018 28-02-2025

Full Judgment

1 WP No. 20091 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28-02-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No. 20091 of 2018

1. K.Sathishkumar S/o. Krishnamoorthi, No. 5/ 804, F3, 3rd Cross Street, Sivakumar Nagar, Hosur, Krishnagiri District Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Management of

M/s. Sundaram Auto Components Ltd., Rubber Division, Belagondapalli, Hosur, Krishnagiri District 2.The Management of Mega Rubber Technologies Ltd., Belagondapalli, Hosur, Krishnagiri District Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari Mandamus Calling for the records of impugned award passed in I.D. NO. 9 of 2014 dated 24.10.2017 which was communicated vide 2 WP No. 20091 of 2018 letter dated 16.03.2018 by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Salem, and quash the same, consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to reinstate the petitioner into service with all service benefits including continuity of service. For Petitioner(s): Mr. Balan Haridas For M/s.M.R.Jothimanian For Respondent(s): Mr. Sanjay Mohan For M/s.S.Ramasubramaniam And Associates For R1 Ms. V. Pavithra, For M/s. V.Srimathi, For R2

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking to quash the award passed in I.D. No. 9 of 2014 dated 24.10.2017 by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Salem, and to consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to reinstate the petitioner into service with all service benefits including continuity of service.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner reported no instructions.

3. The learned counsel for the first respondent submitted that during the

pendency of this writ petition the petitioner received the award amount along with the interest of Rs.3,53,163/-. Hence, no further adjudication is necessary in this writ petition. 3 WP No. 20091 of 2018

4. In view of the above, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected, miscellaneous petition is closed. 28-02-2025 RAP Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No 4 WP No. 20091 of 2018 To The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Salem 5 WP No. 20091 of 2018 M.DHANDAPANI J. RAP WP No. 20091 of 2018 28-02-2025

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties K.Sathishkumar vs The Management of Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani