Chennai Orders Court February 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Murugesan vs Somasundaram
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA and C.M.P.No.16953 of 2019 R.Murugesan ... Appellant ..Vs.. 1.Somasundaram 2.Gopal 3.Rama 4.Lakshmanan ... Respondents PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 16.11.2018 in A.S.No.20 of 2016 on the file of the Sub Court, Arakkonam, reversing the decree and judgment dated 04.03.2016 in O.S.No.288 of 2009 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Arakkonam. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.R.GaneshkumarJUDGMENTWhen the matter is taken up for hearing today, there is no representation for the appellant. The second appeal is of the year 2019 and hence, I do not find any reason to keep the appeal pending.2. In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No mtl To1. The Sub Court, Arakkonam.2....
J.Gunasekar Vs The Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Mr.J.Gunasekar Petitioner vs8.Mr.Sampath Respondents prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to give protection to the trees and parks situated at Sri Sakthi Nagar, Annaiyampalayam, Thriumuruganpoondi Post, Tirupur on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 17.06.2021 with a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Pavendhan For Respondents : Mr.P.Shanthi for R1 & R2. Mr.A.Selvendran, GA for R3 to R7.ORDERToday, when the matter is taken up for hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, nothing survives for further adjudication.2. Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.Speaking order...
M.Ramlal Solanki Vs The Official Trustee and Administrative General of ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. S. SUNDAR AND Vs Vs Mr.D.Lingeswaran The Administrative General And Official Trustee Of Tamil NaduORDERThe applicant herein is the tenant under the respondent in respect of the property bearing Door No.28, Paramasiva Chetty Street, Chennai - 600 003. The applicant has taken out the aforesaid applications for the following reliefs : A) A.No.5553 of 2023 was filed seeking permission to demolish the existing old structure and to reconstruct a new building; and B) A.No.5554 of 2023 was filed seeking a direction to the respondent to grant lease deed for three years.2. On 03.10.2024, this Court passed the following order :1. Learned AG&OT today submitted a Memo dated 03.10.2024 stating thatTermination Notice dated 18.09.2024 has been issued to the applicant indicating the fact tht tenancy of the applicant had been terminated with effect from 15.10.2024. In the same notice, the tenant/applicant is ...
R.Mannu Vs Supriya Sahu and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR in W.P.No.25882 of 2023 R.Mannu ... Petitioner/Petitioner -vs- Guindy, Chennai-600 032. ... Respondents/Respondents Prayer: Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for their wilful disobedience in not complying with theorder dated 05.09.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.25882 of 2023.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mani For Respondents : Dr.T.Seenivasan Spl. Govt. Pleader *****ORDERThe Contempt Petition has been filed for punishing the respondent for having not obeyed the orders of this Court dated 05.09.2023 made in W.P.No.25882 of 2023. N.SATHISH KUMAR,J., ar2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned SpecialGovernment Pleader appearing for the Respondents, by producing a copy of the proceedings dated 17.02.2025 of the 1st respondent, issued in G.O.(2D) No.24, before this Court, submitted that the order of this Court has b...
Durai Kuppuswamy vs Abdul Sukur
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
CMP No.12153 of 2019IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA CMP No.12153 of 2019 in SA No.661 of 2019 Durai Kuppuswamy S/o Duraisamy,No.9 Dilliappa Mudali Street, Palanipet, Arakkonam, Vellore Dist. Appellant(s) Vs Abdul Sukur S/o Khadar Sahib,No.3 Pole Naidu Line Street, Palanipet, Arakkonam, Vellore Dist. Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Ms.S.V.Banu Priya For Respondent(s): Mr.S.RaveendranORDERBy consent, C.M.P.No.12153 of 2019 is closed. 27-02-2025 (2/2) vum https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
P.Paramasivam Vs The Additional Chief
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA P.Paramasivam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Additional Chief Secretary, Transport Department, St.George Fort, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., Ramakrishna Road, Salem - 636 007. 3.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Employees Pension Fund Trust, Pallavan Salai, Chennai 600 002. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Declaration to declare that the petitioner is entitled for the payment of pension along with his commutation as per the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Rules 2000 run by the third respondent Tamil Nadu State Transport Page No.1 of 8Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust and to declare that the petitioner is entitled to count the service rendered in daily paid service prior to 01.04.2003 and to ...
T.Sriram Vs M/s.State Bank of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ and W.M.P.Nos.200 and 202 of 2023 1.T.Sriram 2.T.Jairam .. Petitioners vs 1.M/s.State Bank of India, rep. by its Authorised Officer, 2.M/s.Pioneer Feeds and Poultry Products Pvt. Ltd., rep. by its Official Liquidator, 3.V.Thimmayan 4.A.Natrajan .. Respondents Prayer : Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent not to take possession of the subject property without following due process of law. For Petitioners : Mr.M.S.Swathish Kumar For Respondents : Mr.M.L.Ganesh for respondent No.1ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Mentioned out of turn.2. Counsel for petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.3. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as...
Manimegalai vs Deputy Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19-03-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR MANIMEGALAI W/o.Iyyappan, No.808, K Block, R.R.Nagar, Kodungaiyur, Chennai-600 118. Petitioner(s) Vs Deputy Commissioner Of Police Pulianthope, Chennai, Tamilnadu. and another Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): M/s.R.S.Indira For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Raja Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor, assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester JohnORDER(Order of the Court was made by M.S.Ramesh, J.) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.2. On the ground that the petitioner is in financial distress and unable to comply withthe order of this Court dated 26.02.2025, insofar as it imposes a cost of Rs.10,000/-, this petition is listed under the caption 'for recording compliance' today.3. The petitioner along with her children, though were not summoned by us to appear before this Court, are present. She expresses that they are in financial distress ...
Dr.S.Aruna Vs The Secretary,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.02.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA and W.M.P.Nos.894, 896, 898 & 3920 of 2021 Dr.S.Aruna .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, TNPSC Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai 600 003. 2.The Controller of Examinations, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, TNPSC Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai 600 003. 3.The Secretary to Government, Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. .. Respondents (R3 impleaded as per order of this Court dated 26.09.2023 made in W.M.P.No. 27683 of 2023 in W.P.No.828 of 2021) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records pertaining to the impugned list of candidates provisionally admitted for Oral Test / Interview from 04.01.2021 to 29.01.2021published by the 2nd respondent herein...
M.Gokulnathan vs State Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Crl.M.P.No.1279 of 20221. M.Gokulnathan2. M.Muthusamy3. M.Jothi Petitioners Vs1. The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Respondent/Complainant2. G.Sowmiya Respondent/De facto ComplainantPRAYER: This criminal original petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. To call for the records pertaining to the Crime No.437 of 2021 on the file of the Sankari Police Station, Salem, quash the same. For petitioner: Mr.A.Saravanan For Respondent: Mr.M.PremKumarSUNDER MOHAN,J.vcaORDERWhen this matter was taken up today, the learned Government Advocate (Cril.Side) would submit that final orders have been passed by this Court vide order dated 14.02.2022.2. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is Closed. Connected Crl.M.P.is also closed. vca Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To1. The Inspector of Police,...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »