Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

J.Gunasekar Vs The Commissioner

J.Gunasekar vs The Commissioner

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 27, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1892236

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/15600/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

J.Gunasekar

Respondent

The Commissioner

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 27.02.2025coram:the honourable mr. justice j. sathya narayana prasad mr.j.gunasekar … petitioner vs8.mr.sampath … respondents prayer: writ petitions filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to give protection to the trees and parks situated at sri sakthi nagar, annaiyampalayam, thriumuruganpoondi post, tirupur on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 17.06.2021 with a stipulated time that may be fixed by this court. for petitioner : mr.g.pavendhan for respondents : mr.p.shanthi for r1 & r2. mr.a.selvendran, ga for r3 to r7.ordertoday, when the matter is taken up for hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. hence, nothing survives for further adjudication.2. recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. no costs.speaking order / non-speaking orderindex : yes / no neutral citation : yes / no tsh toj. sathya narayana prasad, j.tsh

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.02.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Mr.J.Gunasekar … Petitioner vs

8.Mr.Sampath … Respondents prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to give protection to the trees and parks situated at Sri Sakthi Nagar, Annaiyampalayam, Thriumuruganpoondi Post, Tirupur on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 17.06.2021 with a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Pavendhan For Respondents : Mr.P.Shanthi for R1 & R2. Mr.A.Selvendran, GA for R3 to R7.

ORDER

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, nothing survives for further adjudication.

2. Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Speaking order / Non-speaking order

Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No tsh To

J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

tsh

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties J.Gunasekar vs The Commissioner Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales