Chennai Orders Court February 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
T.Chinnasamy vs Govindaraj
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL MP NO. 3182 of 2025 IN CRL OP NO. 3948 OF 2025 T.Chinnasamy Managing Director and Authorised Representative, ACS Marine Services Pvt Ltd., No.502/B1, Nadupangu Paradise, Dharapuram Road, Tiruppur-641 608. Appellant(s) Vs GOVINDARAJ S/o. Kalyanasundaram, No.539, Mandakara Street, Thiruvisanallur, Thiruvidaimaruthur Taluk, Thanjavur District - 612 105. and another Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): B. Dhanaraj Deepa Mariappan Mohammed Umar Sangamitra Loganathan VENKATASUBRAMANYAM PARAMADITYAORDEROrdered as prayed for. 27-02-2025 1/2 ham To The Inspector Of Police, Edf-i, Beta-ii, Central Crime Branch, Greater Chennai City Police, Vepery, Chennai-600 007. Cr.No.17/2025. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
V.Thayanandam vs the Metropolitan Transport Corporation
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 27.02.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN W.P.No.6919 of 2025 V. Thayanandam ... Petitioner vs1. The Metropolitan Transport Corporation Limited, Represented by its Managing Director and Chairman / Managing Trustee of Employee Provident Fund Trust, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-2.2. The Metropolitan Transport Corporation Represented by its Chief Finance Officer and Administrator, Employee Provident Fund Trust Trustee,3. The Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Represented by its Senior Deputy Manager, Employee Provident Fund Trust Trustee4. The Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Represented by its Branch Manager, Perambur Depot, Perambur. ...RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to withdraw a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- of the Provident Fund accumulation of petitioner own PF contribution available t...
Mellam Srinivasa Rao vs the Union of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
W.M.P.No.7735 of 2025 in W.P.No.7001 of 2025G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.This petition is ordered on payment of separate Court fee by each of the petitioners. 27.02.2025 1/2 kv https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Vanitha vs the State Rep.by, the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Vanitha ... PetitionerVersusThe State rep by The Inspector of Police, Chennai. ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest on the file of the respondent police in connection with Cr.No.Not Known of 2025. For petitioner : Mr.R.Jai Gandhi For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 379 of IPC in Crime No.Not Known of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), on instructions, submitted that there is no case or petition against the petitioner.3. Recording the said fact, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. Vv To1. The Inspector of Police,2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras,SUNDER MOHAN,...
The Commissioner, Vs K Srinivasan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
CMP.No.4572 of 2025 and W.A.SR.No.27283 of 2025Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J.andC.KUMARAPPAN,J.(Order of the Court was made by Dr.ANITA SUMANTH.,J.) For the reasons stated in the affidavit accompanying the Miscellaneous Petition, leave is granted to file a Writ Appeal and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.2. Registry is directed to numberthe Writ Appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list the same for admission. [A.S.M.,J] [C.K.,J] 27.02.2025 sl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Karunanidhi vs the State by, the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Karunanidhi ... Petitioner Vs. State by Inspector of Police, (Crime No.376/2011). ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to dispense with the appearance of the petitioner in C.C.No.143 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I at Ariyalur, pending disposal of the above criminal revision case. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Kumar, Senior Counsel for Mr.S.Ramachandran For Respondent : Mr.S.Sugendran, Additional Public Prosecutor Page No.1 of 3ORDERThe presence of the petitioner is dispensed with in C.C.No.143 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ariyalur till the disposal of the present revision. vv2 To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ariyalur. 2.The Inspector of Police, 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. Page No.2 of 3M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.vv2 Page No.3 of 3...
K.Thangaramu vs Tamilnadu Housing and Habitat Development Board
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY K.Thangaramu .. Petitioner Vs. 1.State by Tamilnadu Housing and Habitat Development Board Rep.by its Secretary 3.Vedhagiri 4.M.Malathi .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner representations dated 21.01.2025 and 19.02.2025, consequently directing the 1st respondent to allot the flat situated in Dr.Ambedkar Nagar, Manali new town, Chennai 600 103. For the Petitioner : Mr.N.Saravanan For the Respondents : M/s Indhumathi Venkatesh for RR1 & 2ORDERThis Writ Petition is filed for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.01.2025 and 19.02.2025.2. When the matter came up for admission, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Board would submit that as on date, the petition...
K.V.K. Nagaraj Vs The Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
CMP.No.4577 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.12834 of 2025S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.ANDK.RAJASEKAR,J.(Order of the court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) Mr.T.Chandrasekaran, the learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 to 5.2. In view of the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of the petition, delay is condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition stands ordered. [S.M.S., J.] [K.R.S., J.] 27.02.2025 veda Note: Registry is directed to number the writ appeal, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
L.Magesh Kumar Porwal vs the State Rep by, the Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN1. L.Magesh Kumar Porwal2. M.Manjula Devi ... Petitioners Vs1. The State Rep By, The Commissioner of Police,Salem District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to direct the second and third respondents not to harass the petitioners based on representation dated 12.02.2025. For Petitioners : Mr.K.Karthik For Respondents : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate (Crl.side)ORDERThis petition has been filed directing the respondent police not to harass the petitioner and his family members.2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the respondent police harassed the petitioners under the guise of enquiry.3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for therespondent police submits that the police called the petitioner for enquiry in the pending FIR in Crime No.4 of 2...
Rajendiran vs State Represented by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Rajendiran .... Petitioner Vs1. State Represented by The Inspector of Police,2. K.Prabhu .... RespondentPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records and quash the First Information Report as far as the petitioner name in Crime No.523 of 2023 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Tirutani Police Station, Thiruvallur District. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Saravana Kumar For R1 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.523 of 2023 registered by the first respondent police for offences under Sections 294(b), 324, 420 and 506(2) of IPC, as against the petitioner.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for thefirst respondent submitted that the investigation in Crime No.523 of 2023 has been compl...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »