Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vanitha vs the State Rep.by, the Inspector of Police,

Vanitha vs The State Rep.by, the Inspector of Police,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 27, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1802779

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/5258/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vanitha

Respondent

The State Rep.by, the Inspector of Police,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27.02.2025coram :the honourable mr. justice sunder mohan vanitha ... petitionerversusthe state rep by the inspector of police, chennai. ... respondent prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 438 of cr.p.c, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest on the file of the respondent police in connection with cr.no.not known of 2025. for petitioner : mr.r.jai gandhi for respondent : mr.leonard arul joseph selvam government advocate (crl.side)orderthe petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under section 379 of ipc in crime no.not known of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.2. the learned government advocate (crl.side), on instructions, submitted that there is no case or petition against the petitioner.3. recording the said fact, this criminal original petition is closed. vv to1. the inspector of police,2. the public prosecutor, high court of madras,sunder mohan, j.vv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.02.2025

CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Vanitha ... Petitioner

Versus

The State rep by The Inspector of Police, Chennai. ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest on the file of the respondent police in connection with Cr.No.Not Known of 2025. For petitioner : Mr.R.Jai Gandhi For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 379 of IPC in Crime No.Not Known of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), on instructions, submitted that there is no case or petition against the petitioner.

3. Recording the said fact, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. Vv To

1. The Inspector of Police,

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras,

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

Vv

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial