Chennai Orders Court February 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lakshmi vs Union of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHANLakshmi ... Petitioner/A2 Vs. Union of India Rep. By, Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau South Zone Unit, Chennai- 90. ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with the RR No.45 of 2024 pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.Sitchick For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 28.09.2024, seeking bail in RR No.45 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c),28 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with the other accused was found in illegal possession of 52 .700kgs of g...
R Ramesh vs the Deputy State Tax Officer-I,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
CMP.No. 2398 of 2025 in WA SR No. 14507 of 2025S. S. SUNDAR, J.ANDC. SARAVANAN, J.(Order of this Court was made S.S.SUNDAR, J.) This Miscellaneous Petition is filed to dispense with the production of the impugned order dated 12.12.2024 made in W.P.No. 37205 of 2024.2. Ordered as prayed for.3. Registry is directed to number the appeal and list before this Court, if it is otherwise in order. (S.S.S.R., J.) (C.S.N., J.) 27.02.2025 ak https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M/S.Pulsus Health Teach Llp vs the Regional Provident Fund Commissione ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI And W.M.P.Nos.4074, 4076 and 4077 of 2025 M/s.Pulses Health Tech LLP Represented by its Managing Partner Mrs.Anitha Gedela ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I (C & R) Chennai 600 045. 2.The Recovery Officer, Chennai 600 045. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the second respondent relating to the order of the second respondent bearing No.TB/TAM/RO/513/1762050/RECOVERY/2024-2025 dated24.10.2024 and quash the same. For Petitioner : M/s.Ramapriya Gopalakrishnan For Respondents : Mr.R.ThirunavukarasuORDERThe petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the second respondent relating to the order of the second respondent bearing No.TB/TAM/RO/ same.2.The learned counsel appearing for the pet...
Vinayagam vs the State Rep by, the Inspector of Polic E
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMARVinayagam ... Petitioner Vs. The State rep by The Inspector of Police, Veppamkuppam Police Station, Vellore (Crime No.186/2009) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 389(1) of Code of Criminal Procedure, to suspend the substantive sentence imposed upon the petitioner by the judgment passed in S.C.No.209/2012 dated 31- 01-2025, on the file of the Additional District Judge [Fast Track Court], Vellore District and to enlarge the petitioner on bail. For Petitioner : Mr.C.S.Heeva Kuralamudhu For Respondent : Mr.G.V.Kasthuri, Additional Public ProsecutorPage No.1 of 3ORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition and also made an endorsement to that effect. 2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, t...
The Union of India Vs K Padmanabhan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR and W.M.P.No.5092 of 20251. The Union of India Rep by the Secretary to Government, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi- 110 001.2. The Director General of Doordarshan, Prasar Bharati Corporation of India, Coopernicus Marg, New Delhi-1100013. The Deputy Director (Adm) (s1A) Doordarshan Bhavan, Mandi House, Coopernicus Marg, New Delhi-110 001.4. The Director Doordarshan Kendra, Swami Vivekananda Salai, Chennai-05. ... Petitioners Vs.1. K PadmanabhanDoordarshan kendra, Chennai-05. 2.A Vennivel Doordarshan Kendra, Chennai-05 3.R K Selvam 4.V D Gurunathan 5.N Bharathy 6.S Venkatesan 7.R Selvaraju 8.G Perumal 9.V N Athiaman 10.W Mahadevan ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pursuant to ...
P.Rathinasamy vs State Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and Crl.M.P.No.3598 of 20251. P.Rathinasamy2. Rama Elangovan3. K.Nathiga Jothi4. N.Venu Gopal5. R.Palanisamy .... Petitioners Vs1. State, rep. by The Inspector of Police, Crime No.440 of 2019.2. Kumar .... RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records relating to the FIR in Crime No.440 of 2019 dated 26.08.2019 on the file of the 1st respondent quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Doraiswamy For R1 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR registered in Crime No.440 of 2019 dated 26.08.2019 on the file of the first respondent for the offences under Sections 298 and 153A of IPC.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearingfor the first respondent submitted that the proceedings are barred by limi...
Liaqath Ahmed Papa, vs the Government of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and M.P.Nos.2 & 3 of 2012 Liaqath Ahmed Papa ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Secretary to Government,Kuralagam, Chennai 600 108. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the orders in G.O.[D].No.552, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (ME II) Department, dated 31.12.2008 of the first respondent to the limited extent of condition imposed for retirement; and Charge Memos (1) Memo Roc.No.59890/97/C1 dated 07.08.1997 and (2) Roc.No.63921/2008/C3 dated 22.12.2008 of the second respondent, to quashPage No.1 of 4 the same and to issue consequential directions to the respondents permit the petitioner to retire from service on 31.12.2008 A.N. without any condition and with all consequential pensionary and retirement...
K.KUTTY KRISHNAN Vs Government of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR K.Kutty Krishnan ...Petitioner Vs.1. Government of India ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.S.Dhakshnamoorthy For Respondents : Mr.C.SamivelORDER(Order of this Court was made by M.S.RAMESH.J,) The present petition has been filed to vacate the interim stay of operation of the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, granted by this Court on 12.06.2023, which was subsequently, made absolute vide order dated 08.08.2023.2. This Court perused the affidavit filed in support of this petitionand is of the view that allowing the vacate stay petition is almost equivalent to dismissing the Writ Petition, as the direction which has been issued by the Tribunal has to be complied with by the petitioner. Therefore, the present vacate stay petition cannot be entertained and the same has to be decided only at the time of disposal of the main...
Prashanth Kumar vs the Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Prashanth Kumar ... Petitioner Vs4. R.Narayanaswami ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to direct the second For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mohamed Afridi For R1 to R3 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate (Crl.side)ORDERThis petition has been filed for direction directing the second2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondents 1 to 3 and perused the materials placed on record.3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, petition enquiry was conducted and the same was closed.4. Recording the above said submission, this Criminal OriginalPetition stands closed. It is made clear that, since the complaint has been closed, the respon...
Ajithkumar vs State Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL MP NO. 3384 of 2025 in CRL OP NO.23743 of 2023 AJITHKUMAR Appellant(s) Vs State Rep By The Inspector Of Police, Cscid - Chennai. Thiruvallur Police Station, Thiruvallur District. (crime No.203 Of 2023) Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): M/s. A.Arun Kumar C.Arivazhagan For Respondent(s): S.SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE (CRIMINAL SIDE)ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to extend the time for executing the sureties as imposed by this Court upon the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.23743 of 2023 dated 16.10.2023.2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the submissions made on both sides, this criminal miscellaneous petitionstands ordered and thereby, the time already granted by this Court to comply with the conditions in Crl.O.P.No.23743 of 2023 dated 16.10.2023 is extended by two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, on condition, that the petitioner shall...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »