Prashanth Kumar vs the Superintendent of Police,

Prashanth Kumar vs The Superintendent of Police,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 27, 2025

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1782143

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1782143
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan
Decided On: Feb 27, 2025
Case Number: CRL OP/5460/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prashanth Kumar

Respondent

The Superintendent of Police,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27.02.2025coram:the honourable mr. justice g.k.ilanthiraiyan prashanth kumar ... petitioner vs4. r.narayanaswami ... respondents prayer: criminal original petition is filed under section 528 of the bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023 to direct the second for petitioner : mr.m.mohamed afridi for r1 to r3 : mr.k.m.d.muhilan government advocate (crl.side)orderthis petition has been filed for direction directing the second2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government advocate (crl.side) for the respondents 1 to 3 and perused the materials placed on record.3. the learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, petition enquiry was conducted and the same was closed.4. recording the above said submission, this criminal originalpetition stands closed. it is made clear that, since the complaint has been closed, the respondent shall not call the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and harass him. internet:yes index:yes/nospeaking/non speaking ordermn g.k.ilanthiraiyan. j, mn to4. the public prosecutor, high court, madras.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.02.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Prashanth Kumar ... Petitioner Vs
4. R.Narayanaswami ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to direct the second For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mohamed Afridi For R1 to R3 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate (Crl.side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed for direction directing the second

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondents 1 to 3 and perused the materials placed on record.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, petition enquiry was conducted and the same was closed.

4. Recording the above said submission, this Criminal Original

Petition stands closed. It is made clear that, since the complaint has been closed, the respondent shall not call the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and harass him. Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non speaking order

mn G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, mn To

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties Prashanth Kumar vs The Superintendent of Police, Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan