Chennai Orders Court February 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bharath vs the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.02.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Bharath Managing Trustee, Sri Thirupathi Gangai Amman Matrum Kaaliyamman Thirukkoyil Trust, No.141, Bajanai Koil Street, Thollappalli Village & Post, Vellore District. ... Petitioner Vs.7. Rajavel ... RespondentPrayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 5 to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representations dated 04.03.2024 and 03.05.2024 by opening the temple for worship and hand over the keys to the petitioner trust for conducting annual temple festival from 21.05.2024 to 23.05.2024 with due protection.For Petitioner : Mr.J.Venkatesan For Respondents For R1 to R4, R6 : Mr.P.Balathandayutham Special Government Pleader For R5 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R7 : Mr.P.GunarajORDERThis petition has been filed for direction directing the res...
M s Mercedes Benz Financial Services India Pvt Ltd Vs D K Sharma
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 10.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI Arb. Appln. No.53 of 2025 M/s. Mercedes - Benz Financial Services India Pvt. Ltd, (formerly known as M/s. Daimler Financial Services India Private Limited), 5th Floor, Plot 8, Baashyam Willow Square, 9 &10, First Street, Thiru vi ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai-600032, Tamil Nadu, India. Represented by its Authorised Signatory ... Applicant vs. D.K.Sharma ... RespondentPRAYER: This Arbitration Application filed under ORDER XIV RULE 8 OF O.S. RULES READ WITH SEC 9 (II) (d) & (e) OF ARBITRATION ACT 1996, the petitioner prays for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to seize and deliver the Asset Mercedes-Benz A 200 LIMOUSINE Motor Car bearing Registration No. CH-01-CN-8920, Engine No. 28291430393821 and Chassis No. W1K1771876L000646 available at the Respondent's premises or wherever found and permit the Advocate commissioner to obtain police aid and to break open theF...
M s Mercedes Benz Financial Services India Pvt Ltd Vs D K Sharma
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE M s Mercedes Benz Financial Services India Pvt Ltd 5th Floor Plot 8 Baashyam Willow Square 9 and 10 First Street Thiru vi ka Industrial Estate Guindy Chennai 600032 Tamil Nadu India Appellant(s) Vs D K Sharma Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Ms.Narmadha for Mr.M.Arunachalam For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Ruban Chakravarthy-Advocate CommissionerORDERThis Court, by its order dated 10.01.2025, appointed an Advocate Commissioner to repossess the vehicle from the respondent or wherever available. Till date, the Advocate Commissioner appointed by this Court is unable to repossess the vehicle.ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.2. The learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the vehicle has not been located and only due to the said reason, the Advocate Commissioner could not repossess the vehicle.3. No useful purpose will be served if this application is allowed to be keptpending. Therefore, this Applica...
S. Ramu Vs Mrs. M. Uma and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 27/2/2025CORAMThe Hon'ble Ms.JUSTICE BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN Contempt Petition No.343 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.3396 and 3398 of 2025 S. Ramu Son of Sanjeevi, No. 69, South Mada Street, Maduravoyal, Chennai 600 095. ... Petitioner Vs Mrs. M. Uma (Non-credit), Kuralagam, and another ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the first respondent for having willfully and deliberately disobeyed the final orders passed in W.P.No.8792 of 2024 dated 25/4/2024. For petitioner ... Mr.T.S.Rajmohan For respondents ... Mrs.M.Geetha Thamaraiselvan Special Government Pleader -----ORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the first respondent for having willfully and deliberately disobeyed the final orders passed in W.P.No.8792 of 2024 dated 25/4/2024.2. Today, this matter has come up under the caption For Reporting Compliance.3. On an earlier occasion, vide, order dated 14/2/2025, this Court had ...
Sakkaravarthi Vs State Rep. by, Sub- Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN A.Sakkaravarthi S/o.Annamalai No.3/305A, Mohan Nagar, Moongilthuraipattu, Sankarapuram Taluk, Villupuram - 605 702 Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep. by, Sub- Inspector of Police, Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): VS Dinesh For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PRAYER to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in the event of his arrest in Crime No. 147 of 2024 on the file of Sub-Inspector of Police, E-10, Moongilthuraipattu Police Station, Kallakurichi and thus render justice.ORDERLearned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 27-02-2025 ham SUNDER MOHAN J. ham To1. State Rep. by, Sub- Inspector of Police, 27.02.2...
Devender Ahuja vs the State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and Crl.M.P.No.3559 of 2025 Devender Ahuja ... Petitioner Vs1. The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Police Station, East Zone - Chennai - 600 028.2. Subramaniasarma,3. The Branch Manager,HDFC Bank, SG-5, 6, DLF Phase - 4 Galeria Market, Gurgaon, Haryana - 122009. ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to set aside the order passed by the Learned XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, in Crl.M.P.No.23217 of 2024 in CSR.No.26 of 2023 dated 29.11.2024 and consequently to direct the third Respondent to remit the amount of Rs.79,990/- to the Petitioner's account. For Petitioner : M/s Mahima Makhija For R1 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate (Crl.side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to set aside the order passed by the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, in Crl.M.P.N...
Rubeena vs the State Rep.by Its,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL MP NO. 3415 of 2025 in CRL OP NO.23395 of 2023 RUBEENA Appellant(s) Vs The State Rep.By Its, The Inspector Of Police, D-4 Kuniyamuthur Police Station, Coimbatore, District Cr.No.308 Of 2023. Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): N. Arun Kumar P.Narayana Prasadh For Respondent(s): S.SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE (CRIMINAL SIDE)ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to extend the time for complying with the conditions as imposed by this Court upon the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.23395 of 2023 dated 03.11.2023.2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the submissions made on both sides, this criminal miscellaneous petitionstands ordered and thereby, the time already granted by this Court to comply with the conditions in Crl.O.P.No.23395 of 2023 dated 03.11.2023 is extended by two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, on condition, that the petitioner shall de...
Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Marketing Division, Vs N C S Road Line ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE andIndian Oil Corporation Limited, Marketing Division, Southern Region, Indian Oil Bhavan, 139, Uthamar Gandhi Road Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai 600 034 and 3 others ... Applicants vs. N C S Road Lines Transports Rep by its Proprietor M Senthil Kumar Opp Murugan Kovil, 1/A-4, Mayampillayar Kovil Road, Salem Road Namakkal 637 001. ... Respondent -----This matter is listed before me for the 2nd time. Both the learned counsels seek time to file their notes of submissions. Post the matter for arguments finally on 03.04.2025.2. Since this Court is going to take up the main O.P. for final disposal, no useful purpose would be served if A. No.395 of 2025 is allowed to be kept pending. Accordingly, A. No.395 is closed.ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.and...
Sarasu vs the State Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR and W.M.P.No.4655 of 2025 SARASU ... Petitioner/mother of the detenue Vs.1. The State Rep By The Secretary To Government Of Tamilnadu, Home Department, (prison Branch-IV), Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009 2.The Director Inspector General Of Prison, Coimbatore Range, 3.The Superintendent 4.The SuperintendentSalem Central Prison, Salem-636 007 ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order bearing No.608514/Tha.Ku3/2024 dated 31.12.2024 passed by the 4th respondent and quash the same and consecutively, direct the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 30 days, without escort to the detenue, Ajithkumar S/o.Sambu aged about 25 years, bearing Convict No.9975, confined at Central pri...
K.K.74,Sarakka Pillaiyur vs P.Maheswari
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
W.M.P. No. 5175 of 2015 in Rev. Aplw. SR. No. 11905 of 2025R.N.MANJULA, J.This writ miscellaneous petition is filed to condone the delay of 92 days in filing this Review Petition.2. Heard Mr.R.Ramesh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.A.M.Ayyadurai, learned Government Advocate for the respondents.3. The learned Government Advocate for the respondents has stated no objection in ordering this petition.4. Considering the averments made in theaccompanying affidavit and also consider the no objection stated on behalf of the respondents, the delay is condoned and accordingly, this writ miscellaneous petition is ordered. 27.02.2025 Maya Note : Registry is directed to list the matter on 17.03.2025. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1 of 1...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »