Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Devender Ahuja vs the State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,

Devender Ahuja vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 27, 2025
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1725680

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/5520/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devender Ahuja

Respondent

The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,

Excerpt

.....of 2023 dated 29.11.2024, thereby directing the first respondent to defreeze the petitioner's account numbers and to transfer the said amount or if it is less than the same, the remaining available balance amount to the account of the defacto complainant.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government advocate (crl.side) for the first respondent and perused the materials available on record.3. on the complaint in csr no.26 of 2023, on the file of the firstrespondent, the first respondent requested the third respondent to freeze the account of the petitioner on the allegation of on-line fraud. pending enquiry, the first respondent filed an application for debit of a sum of rs.79,990/- to the defacto complainant's account and the same was allowed.4. a perusal of the complaint revealed that the defacto complainantwas cheated by the fraudsters account to the tune of rs.1,99,000/- through bank transaction. during the course of preliminary enquiry, a sum of rs.1,99,000/- was transferred to the fraudsters account. therefore, the said account was requested to be freezed and a sum of rs.79,990/- to be transferred in favour of the complainant. on the said request, the xi metropolitan magistrate, saidapet, chennai on 29.11.2024 ordered to debit a sum of rs.79,990/- from the petitioner's account. during the preliminary enquiry, the amount has been transferred to the petitioner's account. now, the enquiry is pending.5. in view of the above, this court finds no infirmity or illegality inthe order passed by the xi metropolitan magistrate, saidapet, in crl.m.p.no.23217 of 2024 in csr.no.26 of 2023 dated 29.11.2024. it is made clear that as per the order passed by the xi metropolitan magistrate, saidapet, in crl.m.p.no.23217 of 2024 in csr.no.26 of 2023 dated 29.11.2024, after debit of the said amount, the account of the petitioner shall be defreezed and the petitioner can operate his account.6. accordingly, this criminal.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.02.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and Crl.M.P.No.3559 of 2025 Devender Ahuja ... Petitioner Vs

1. The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Police Station, East Zone - Chennai - 600 028.

2. Subramaniasarma,

3. The Branch Manager,

HDFC Bank, SG-5, 6, DLF Phase - 4 Galeria Market, Gurgaon, Haryana - 122009. ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to set aside the order passed by the Learned XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, in Crl.M.P.No.23217 of 2024 in CSR.No.26 of 2023 dated 29.11.2024 and consequently to direct the third Respondent to remit the amount of Rs.79,990/- to the Petitioner's account. For Petitioner : M/s Mahima Makhija For R1 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate (Crl.side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed to set aside the order passed by the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, in Crl.M.P.No.23217 of 2024 in CSR.No.26 of 2023 dated 29.11.2024, thereby directing the first respondent to defreeze the petitioner's account numbers and to transfer the said amount or if it is less than the same, the remaining available balance amount to the account of the defacto complainant.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the first respondent and perused the materials available on record.

3. On the complaint in CSR No.26 of 2023, on the file of the first

respondent, the first respondent requested the third respondent to freeze the account of the petitioner on the allegation of on-line fraud. Pending enquiry, the first respondent filed an application for debit of a sum of Rs.79,990/- to the defacto complainant's account and the same was allowed.

4. A perusal of the complaint revealed that the defacto complainant

was cheated by the fraudsters account to the tune of Rs.1,99,000/- through bank transaction. During the course of preliminary enquiry, a sum of Rs.1,99,000/- was transferred to the fraudsters account. Therefore, the said account was requested to be freezed and a sum of Rs.79,990/- to be transferred in favour of the complainant. On the said request, the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai on 29.11.2024 ordered to debit a sum of Rs.79,990/- from the petitioner's account. During the preliminary enquiry, the amount has been transferred to the petitioner's account. Now, the enquiry is pending.

5. In view of the above, this Court finds no infirmity or illegality in

the order passed by the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, in Crl.M.P.No.23217 of 2024 in CSR.No.26 of 2023 dated 29.11.2024. It is made clear that as per the order passed by the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, in Crl.M.P.No.23217 of 2024 in CSR.No.26 of 2023 dated 29.11.2024, after debit of the said amount, the account of the petitioner shall be defreezed and the petitioner can operate his account.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed. 27.02.2025 Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non speaking order

mn To

1. The XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet.

2. The Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Police Station, East Zone - Chennai - 600 028.

3. The Branch Manager, HDFC Bank, SG-5, 6, DLF Phase - 4 Galeria Market, Gurgaon, Haryana - 122009.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, mn 27.02.2025

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial