Chennai Orders Court February 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mrs. V.Bakthajana, vs Government of Tamilnadu,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
W.M.P.No.652 of 2024 in W.P.No.5057 of 2007R.N.MANJULA, J.This Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to modify the order passed in the above Writ Petition.2. The grievance of the petitioneris that on 14.12.2010, the Court has granted only the notional benefit and that has to be modified as monetary benefit. As the petitioner seeks modification with respect to the merits of the relief, that cannot be done by mere modification, but only by preferring a Writ Appeal. Hence, I feel this Miscellaneous Petition is not maintainable. Accordingly, this Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.28.02.2025 gsk 1 of 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Hakkim Vs Mr. S. Ramamoorthi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.02.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Hakkim ... Petitioner Vs. Mr.S.Ramamoorthi, Commissioner, Tiruppur Municipal Corporation, Tiruppur District. ... Respondent Prayer : Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying to punish the respondent for the wilful disobedience of order of this Hon'ble Court dated 21.10.2024 in W.P.No.1931 of 2024. For Petitioner : M/s.M.Rajamathivanan For Respondent : Mr.Abishek MurthyORDERThis contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of theorder dated 21.10.2024 made in W.P.No.1931 of 2024.M.DHANDAPANI,J.pri 2.It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent that the order dated 21.10.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.1931 of 2024, which is the subject matter of contempt was complied with. 3.In view of the above, this Contempt Petition is closed. pri Index: Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No NCC: Yes/No Contempt Petition N...
R.Venkatesappa Vs M.Balakrishnan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.02.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH R.Venkatesappa ... Petitioner Vs. Mr.Balakrishnan Krishnagiri District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed u/s.11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed in Crl.O.P.No.19821 of 2023 dated 03.08.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz For Respondent : Mr.V.J.Priyadarsana Government AdvocateORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed praying to punish the respondents for wilfully disobeying the orders passed in Crl.O.P.No.19821 of 2023 dated 30.08.2023. 2.Mr.P.Prakash, Inspector of Police, Berigai Police Station, Krishnagiri Distrct (Mobile:9498170005) was present at the time of hearing. 3.When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the affidavit of the respondent was filed and the relevant portion is extracted hereunder:6.I respectfully submit that based on the petitioner complaint, the resp...
The Management of Switzer vs the Presiding Officer,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
1 WP No. 10626 of 2013IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI The Management of Switzer Instruments Ltd., No.127, Sidco Industrial Estate, Ambattur, Chennai 600 098. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Presiding Officer,2.S.Vasanthan, Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 1st respondent Labour Court in I.D.No.483 of 2001 and quash the Award dt.09.11.2012 passed therein. For Petitioner: No appearance 2 WP No. 10626 of 2013 For Respondents: R1 - Labour Court M/s.K.Elango For R2 *****ORDERWhen this matter came up for hearing on earlier two occasions, i.e. 19.02.2025 and 21.02.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In order to give one more opportunity, this Court has directed the matter to be listed today i.e., 28.02.2025 under the caption For Dismissal.2. Even today, when the matter is called, non...
Mrs.K.Saroja vs the District Collector,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.02.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI W.P.No.6836 of 2025 K. Saroja Petitioner vs.1. The District Collector Kallakuruchi District Kallakurichi 606 2022. The District Revenue Officer District Collector Office3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Revenue Divisional Office4. The Tahsildar Chinna Salem Taluk Office Chinnasalem 606 2075. Velayudham6. Periyasamy7. Chinnapillai8. Anbarasan9. Bhupathi Page Nos.1/610. Chinnaponnu11. Raasambal12. Manikandan13. Ambika14. Meenakshi15. Palani16. Ayodhyi17. Shanthi18. Kulanthaivel19. Marimuthu20. Chinnasamy21. Selvam22. Periyasamy23. Narayanasamy24. Ramasamy25. Saroja26. Venkatesan27. Marimuthu28. Kandasamy29. Karuppaiyan Page Nos.2/630. Prabhakaran31. Periyasamy RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to consider and dispose of the peti...
S.Pavithra vs V. Keshave
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED :28.02.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA S.Pavithra ... Petitioner Vs. K.Keshave ... Respondent Prayer:- Transfer Petition is filed under Section 24 of the CPC to withdraw HMOP.NO.353 of 2022 pending before Honble Sub Court, Thiruvottiyur, Tiruvallur District and to transfer the same to the Honble Principal Family Court at Chennai, Chennai District. For Petitioner : M/s.S.Sivasubramani For Respondent : M/s.M.AnsarbashaORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the above Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.Index : Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No To 1.The Sub Court, Thiruvottiyur, Tiruvallur District. 2.The Principal Family Court at Chennai, ...
Usha Kiran Anne Vs Kiran Kumar Chava alias Kiran Chava
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.02.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM Contempt Petition No.218 of 2025 Usha Kiran Anne W/o Mr.Kiran Kumar Chava .. Petitioner v.1. Kiran Kumar Chava alias Kiran ChavaS/o Mr.C.S.Durga Prasad .. Respondent Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order dated 01.02.2023 made in C.R.P.No.4156 of 2022. For Petitioner :: Mrs.Usha Kiran Anne Party-in-PersonORDERThe issues relating to custody of children are now sub judice before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. As per the statement of the petitioner, who is appearing in person, the children are now in the custody of the respondent. Therefore, the contempt petition stands closed. Index : yes/no 28.02.2025 Neutral citation : yes/no ssS.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.ss 28.02.2025...
Usha Kiran Anne Vs Kiran Kumar Chava alias Kiran Chava
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.02.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM Contempt Petition No.219 of 2025 Usha Kiran Anne W/o Mr.Kiran Kumar Chava .. Petitioner v.1. Kiran Kumar Chava alias Kiran ChavaS/o Mr.C.S.Durga Prasad .. Respondent Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order dated 01.02.2023 made in C.R.P.No.3586 of 2022. For Petitioner :: Mrs.Usha Kiran Anne Party-in-PersonORDERThe issues relating to custody of children are now sub judice before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. As per the statement of the petitioner, who is appearing in person, the children are now in the custody of the respondent. Therefore, the contempt petition stands closed. Index : yes/no 28.02.2025 Neutral citation : yes/no ssS.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.ss 28.02.2025...
K.Jeyaprakash vs Selva Kumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
W.M.P.Nos.7885 of 2025 in W.P.No.7118 of 2025S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.ANDK.RAJASEKAR,J.(Order of the court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) Dispensed with for the present. [S.M.S., J.] [K.R.S., J.] 28.02.2025 (3/3) veda https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
THG Publishing Private Limited, Vs MR.V.SHRINIVASAN
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
A.No.1045 of 2025 in C.S.No.194 of 2024K.KUMARESH BABU, J.The present Application has been filed to condone the delay of 99 days in filing the written statement of applicant/defendant 2 and 3.2. Mr.Sharath Chandran, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the 1st respondent submitted that he has no objection in allowing this application.3. Heard both sides.4. Considering the averments made inthe affidavit filed in support of this application and also taking into consideration that the learned counsel for the respondent has no objection in allowing this application, the same is ordered as prayed for and the delay is condoned. 28.02.2025 (1/2) kak https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »