R.Venkatesappa Vs M.Balakrishnan

R.Venkatesappa vs M.Balakrishnan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 28, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1702883

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1702883
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh
Decided On: Feb 28, 2025
Case Number: CONT P/125/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

R.Venkatesappa

Respondent

M.Balakrishnan

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 28.02.2025coramthe honourable mr.justice n.anand venkatesh r.venkatesappa ... petitioner vs. mr.balakrishnan krishnagiri district. ... respondent prayer: contempt petition filed u/s.11 of the contempt of courts act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed in crl.o.p.no.19821 of 2023 dated 03.08.2023. for petitioner : mr.m.mohamed riyaz for respondent : mr.v.j.priyadarsana government advocateorderthis contempt petition has been filed praying to punish the respondents for wilfully disobeying the orders passed in crl.o.p.no.19821 of 2023 dated 30.08.2023. 2.mr.p.prakash, inspector of police, berigai police station, krishnagiri distrct (mobile:9498170005) was present at the time of hearing. 3.when the matter was taken up for hearing today, the affidavit of the respondent was filed and the relevant portion is extracted hereunder:6.i respectfully submit that based on the petitioner complaint, the respondent police conducted enquiry. thereafter, on 16.02.2025, the respondent police provided police protection to revenue officials to conduct survey of petitioner's land and the survey also taken place in peaceful manner, the petitioner also acknowledge the same. during the survey, tr..mookappan, sub inspector of police, tr.selvam, special sub inspector of police, tr.palani, head constable provided the police protection.4.the learned government advocate also placed the acknowledgement made by the petitioner after the survey was conducted with police protection. 5.recording the above, this contempt petition is closed. neutral citation: yes/no index: yes/nospeaking order/non-speaking orderssr to krishnagiri district. n.anand venkatesh, j ssr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.02.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH R.Venkatesappa ... Petitioner Vs. Mr.Balakrishnan Krishnagiri District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed u/s.11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed in Crl.O.P.No.19821 of 2023 dated 03.08.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz For Respondent : Mr.V.J.Priyadarsana Government Advocate

ORDER

This Contempt Petition has been filed praying to punish the respondents for wilfully disobeying the orders passed in Crl.O.P.No.19821 of 2023 dated 30.08.2023. 2.Mr.P.Prakash, Inspector of Police, Berigai Police Station, Krishnagiri Distrct (Mobile:9498170005) was present at the time of hearing. 3.When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the affidavit of the respondent was filed and the relevant portion is extracted hereunder:

6.I respectfully submit that based on the petitioner complaint, the respondent police conducted enquiry. Thereafter, on 16.02.2025, the respondent police provided police protection to Revenue Officials to conduct survey of petitioner's land and the Survey also taken place in peaceful manner, the petitioner also acknowledge the same. During the survey, Tr..Mookappan, Sub Inspector of Police, Tr.Selvam, Special Sub Inspector of Police, Tr.Palani, Head Constable provided the police protection.

4.The learned Government Advocate also placed the acknowledgement made by the petitioner after the survey was conducted with police protection. 5.Recording the above, this contempt petition is closed. Neutral Citation: Yes/No Index: yes/no

Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order

ssr To Krishnagiri District. N.ANAND VENKATESH, J ssr

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties R.Venkatesappa vs M.Balakrishnan Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh