Chennai Orders Court December 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Appu (Died) vs Perumal (Died)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-19-2025
C.M.P.No.10552 of 2023 in S.A.No.1238 of 2005 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J., The Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to condone the delay of 50 days in filing this restoration petition to restore the order of this Court in S.A.No.1238 of 2005 dated 31.01.2023. 2.Mr.Mani, the learned counsel for the respondents does not seriously oppose the application. 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. Registry is directed to number the restoration petition, if it is otherwise inorder.19.12.2025 ep Page No.1 of 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
R.Sagunthala vs State Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-18-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18-12-2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA AND 1.R.Sagunthala W/o. Ramasamy 2.V.S. Anuja @ Kalaiselvi W/o. O.Singaravelu 3.R.Anitha W/o. Saravanakumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1.State Rep By Inspector Of Police, All Women Police Station, Dharmapuri District. 2.Tamil Jothi W/o. Thangaprakash ..Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Sec.482, Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to CC.No. 222/2022 on the file of the learned Additional Mahila Court, Dharmapuri and quash the same as illegal, incompetent and abuse of process. For Petitioner(s): Ms. Rajeswari Karthikeyan For Respondent(s): Mr. K.M.D.Muhilan, Addl. Public Prosecutor For R1 Mr.T.Ganesan for R2 __________Page 1 of 3ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in CC.No. 222/2022 on the file of the learned Additional Mahila Court, Dharmapuri.2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the lear...
S.Sundari vs the State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-18-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on Pronounced on11.12.2025 18.12.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P. NO. 1151 OF 2024 S.Sundari .. Petitioner - Vs -1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Principal Secretary To Government School Education Department Secretariat, Fort St. George Chennai 600 009.2. The Director of Elementary Education DPI Campus, College Road Chennai 600 006.3. The Principal Accountant General (A&E) Tamil Nadu, O/o The Principal Accountant General, 361, Anna Salai Teynampet, Chennai 600 018.4. The District Educational Ofcer (Elementary) Mayiladuthurai District Mayiladuthurai.5. The Block Educational Ofcer II Kollidam Block, Mayiladuthurai District. .. RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order issued by the 4 th respondent in Na.Ka. No.3005/A6/2023 dated 22.11.2023 and to qua...
S.Shanmugaviji vs the State Rep by Its,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-18-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18-12-2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA AND S.Shanmugaviji W/o.Srinivasan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The State Rep By Its, The Inspector Of Police, All Women Police Station, Sirkazhi Mayiladuthurai. 2.Banupriya D/o.S.Kumaravelu ..Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Sec.482, Cr.P.C., to call for the records in C.C.No.14 of 2016 in Cr.No.8 of 2015 dated 24.12.2015 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate at Sirkazhi and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Maniprabhu For Respondent(s): Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, Addl. Public Prosecutor For R1 R2 - No appearanceOrderThe Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.14 of 2016 in Cr.No.8 of 2015 dated 24.12.2015 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate at Sirkazhi. __________Page 1 of 32. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learnedAddl. Public Prosecutor appearing for the fi...
R.Thennarasu vs a.Nagamoorthi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-18-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18-12-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMARR.Thennarasu S/o.Ramanathan, No.128 Mariamman Koil Street, Kennady Nagar, Suramangalam, Salem 636 005. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.A.Nagamoorthi, S/o.Late Arunachalam, No.4/136, East Street, Devarayapuram, Sellipalayam Village, Senthamangalam Taluk, 2.The Tahsildar Kolli Hills Taluk Office, 3.The Head Surveyor, O/o.Kolli Hills Taluk Office, Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Marudhachalamurthy For Respondent: Mr.V.Elangovan for R1Mr.V.Jeevagiridharan Additional Government Pleader for R2 & R3ORDERThis petition is filed seeking to grant leave to the petitioner to recall theorder dated 05.07.2024 made in W.P.No.18411 of 2024 on the ground that hewas not heard while disposing of the aforesaid writ petition. 2.This Court while disposing the aforesaid writ petition has not passed any adverse order against the petitioner and only a direction has been issued to the respondents therein to cons...
M.Chandramani Vs State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-18-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED :18.12.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA W.P.No.1367 of 2022 and W.M.P.No.1487 of 2022 M.Chandramani ... Petitioner Vs.1. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.2. The Director of Fisheries, Office of Directorate of Fisheries, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035.3. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, V.O.C Nagar, Park Town, Chennai 600 003. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner for selection and appointment to the post of Assistant Director of Fisheries based on the selection as per Notification No.42 of 2012 dated 01.11.2012 issued by the 3rd respondent TNPSC, consequent to the provisional selection list issued in the year 2017 and the supplementa...
T.Jothimalar vs the Principal District Judge,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-18-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18.12.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED T.Jothimalar .. Petitioner Vs. Chennai 600 104. .. RespondentsPrayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records of the first respondent in connection with the impugned order passed by him in his order in A.No.244/A/2021 dated 28.12.2021 and quash the same insofar as the petitioner is concerned in respect of probation of the petitioner, w.e.f. 12.09.2021 and consequently direct the respondents to declare the probation of the petitioner w.e.f. 01.03.2009 and further direct the respondents to revise the seniority of the petitioner in the cadre of Assistant and grant promotion to the petitioner at par with her junior and place her in the seniority in between R.Saravanan and M.Manjula.For the Petitioner : Mr.S.Sarathkumar For the Respondents : Mr.R.Raman L...
P.Ananth Vs The Chairman,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-18-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED :18.12.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA P.Ananth ... Petitioner Vs. Egmore, Chennai 08 ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to select and appoint the petitioner in the post of Sub Inspector of Police (Taluk, Armed Reserve (Men and Women / Transgender) and Tamil Nadu Special Police (Men) 2019 under SC Non - Departmental category by operating the reserve list in accordance with Section 27 (f) of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service Act) 2016 within the time stipulated by this Court.For Petitioner : Mr.A.Mohammed Ismail for M/s.Veera Associates For Respondents 1 and 2 : Mr.D.Sowmi DattanORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and also the endo...
Govindaraj vs State by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-18-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 18.12.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN Govindaraj ... Petitioner Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Thudiyalur, Coimbatore District. ... Respondent Prayer: This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking suspension of 23.12.2020 pending disposal of the above appeal. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Arunagiri For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodaran, Additional Public Prosecutor Assisted by Ms.Arifa Thasneem *******ORDER(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.) This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking suspension of 23.12.2020 2 This appeal is pending from the year 2021. However, typed set of papers are being made ready and this Court is also inclined to take up the main appeal itself for hearing and hence this miscellaneous petition seeking suspension of sentence is closed. 3 At request of the learned counsel for the app...
D.Srilatha vs 1.the Secy., the Railway Emplo
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-18-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 09.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY D.Srilatha ...Petitioner Vs1. The Secretary, The Railway Employees Co-operative, Credit Society Ltd., Southern Railway Office, Chennai 600 003. & 3 Ors. ...Respondents For Petitioner : Mrs.D.Nagasaila For Respondent : Mr.Anand Gopalan assisted by Mr.A.Jenasenan [R1] Mr.S.Senthil Murugan, Special Govt. Pleader [R2]ORDERToday, the matter is listed under the caption For Being Mentioned.2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in the prayer portion of the order, a sentence has been left out. Hence, the same is corrected as follows:D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Declaration, to declare Rules I-A, I-B and II-A of the Conduct Rules and Discipline and Appeal Rules supplied to the petitioner as an enclosure along with the letter dated 27.11.03 from the 4 th responde...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »