Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Appu (Died) vs Perumal (Died)

Appu (Died) vs Perumal (Died)

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Dec 19, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1895282

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/10552/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Appu (Died)

Respondent

Perumal (Died)

Excerpt

c.m.p.no.10552 of 2023 in s.a.no.1238 of 2005 v.lakshminarayanan, j., the civil miscellaneous petition is filed to condone the delay of 50 days in filing this restoration petition to restore the order of this court in s.a.no.1238 of 2005 dated 31.01.2023. 2.mr.mani, the learned counsel for the respondents does not seriously oppose the application. 3.being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this civil miscellaneous petition is allowed. registry is directed to number the restoration petition, if it is otherwise inorder.19.12.2025 ep page no.1 of 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

C.M.P.No.10552 of 2023 in S.A.No.1238 of 2005 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J., The Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to condone the delay of 50 days in filing this restoration petition to restore the order of this Court in S.A.No.1238 of 2005 dated 31.01.2023. 2.Mr.Mani, the learned counsel for the respondents does not seriously oppose the application. 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. Registry is directed to number the restoration petition, if it is otherwise in

order.

19.12.2025 ep Page No.1 of 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial