Chennai Orders Court November 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Director General of Police, Vs S. TAMILMANI
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
C.M.P.No.10023 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.39916 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDHEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by R. SURESH KUMAR, J.) This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 800 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the petitioners.3. Mr.G.Bala, learned counsel takes notice for respondent and he has no serious objection in allowing the petition.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. (R.S.K., J.) (H.C., J.) 21.11.2025 vji https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Dr.V.Pandiyan Vs The Registrar,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR and W.M.P. No.10427 of 2019 Dr.V.Pandiyan S/o.Mr.I.D.Velayudham, V.R.P Higher Secondary School, 17-A Ramanathan Road, Villupuram. Petitioner(s) Vs Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Science University (TANUVAS), Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus yo direct the respondent to consider and pass order based on the representation dated 11.03.2019. For Petitioner : Mr.A.S.Mujibur Rahman (through VC) For Respondent : Mrs.V.Yamuna Devi Special Government PleaderORDERMr.A.S.Mujibur Rahman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner through Video Conferencing submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and thus the writ petition has become infructuous.2. Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, the writ petition is closed as in...
Dr.J.Haja Gani vs Commissioner of Collegiate Education,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
in W.P.No.8475 of 2025This petition is filed to amend the prayer in W.P.No.8475 of 2025, from respondent dated 07.02.2025 bearing RC.No.A/DP/JHG/3199 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 and 4 not to proceed with the Charge Memo bearing Proceedings Rc.No.A/DP/JHG/2021/2687 dated 05.02.2021 in any manner and pass such other orders or directions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, award costs and render justice. to respondent, quash the proceedings of the 3rd respondent dated 07.02.2025 bearing Rc.No.A/DP/JHG/3199 and the College Council Meeting of the 3rd respondent dated 14.03.2025 in respect of Resolution No.8 & 9 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 & 4 not to proceed with the Charge Memo bearing Proceedings Rc.No.A/DP/JHG/2021/2687 dated 05.02.2021 in any manner and pass such other orders or directions as this Hon'ble Court m...
Dr.J.Haja Gani vs Commissioner of Collegiate Education,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
WMP.No.13226 of 2025 in W.P.No.8475 of 2025G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.This petition is filed to permit the petitioner to raise the additional grounds in W.P.No.8475 of 2025.2. Heard both sides.3. Being satisfied with reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered as prayed for. 21.11.2025 (2/3) klt https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M.Purushothaman Vs Mrs.P.meenavathi and 10 Others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL AND A NO. 3088 OF 20251. M.Purushothaman S/o.Late Mr.S.Mohan Naidu, Door Petitioner(s) Vs1. Mrs.P.meenavathi and 10 OthersW/o.Mr.M.Purushothaman, Door 2.P.Dharani Kumar S/o.Mr.M.Purushothaman, Door 3.P.Vidhya Priya D/o.Mr.M.Purushothaman, W/o.Mr.Krishna Kumar Alam Venugopal, Door No.B4/12, Adithya Enclave, Mogappair Eri Scheme, Chennai - 600 037. 4.P.Prathap S/o.Mr.M.Purushothaman, Door5.D.Shaharika (Minor) D/o.Mr.P.Dharani Kumar, Rep. by her Mother and Natural Guardian Mrs.V.Monisha, W/o.P.Dharani Kumar, Door No.6/17, Muthumariyamman Kovil Street, Nelvayal Nagar, Perambur, Chennai - 600 011. 6.A.K.Khashik Vinayak (Minor) S/o.Mr.Krishna Kumar Alam Venugopal, Rep. by his Mother and Natural Guardian Mrs.Vidhya Priya, W/o.Krishna Kumar Alam Venugopal, Door No.B4/12, Adithya Enclave Mogappair Eri Scheme, Chennai - 600 037. 7.A.K.Saanvika (Minor) D/o.Mr.Krishna Kumar Alam Venugopal, Rep. by ...
K.Prabhakaran Vs Superintending Engineer,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR and W.M.P. No.12172 of 2019 K.Prabhakaran S/o.Kangaraj.A, Junior Engineer, Gr-I, (Under orders of Suspension) O and M Pakkam, TANGEDCO, Thirunindravur. Petitioner(s) Vs Superintending Engineer, Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondent relating to the orders passed in Memo No.012807 /ADM 2 /A1 / F. Suspension /2011 dated 10/10/2011, to quash the same and issue consequential directions to the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with consequential benefits.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Madhu Balaji for Mr.M.Ravi For Respondent : Mr.David Sundar Singh Standing CounselORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been granted all the benefits payable to him and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent has fu...
Dr.S.Daphne Reberkal vs the Director of Collegiate Education
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
WMP.No.13414 of 2025 in WP.No.11854 of 2025G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this miscellaneous petition, this writ miscellaneous petition to permit the petitioners to join together to file a single writ petition, is allowed on payment of separate court fee. 21.11.2025 (1/2) lok https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
State of Tamilnadu Vs J.John Wesley
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
C.M.P.No.10145 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.50871 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDHEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by R. SURESH KUMAR, J.) This miscellaneous petition has been filed to dispense with the production of the original copy of the impugned order dated 18.12.2023 made in W.P.No.4978 of 2023.2. Perusing the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition and satisfying the same, this miscellaneous petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to number the above writ appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise inorder.(R.S.K., J.) (H.C., J.) 21.11.2025 vji https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
P.Kandhan vs the Chief Executive Engineer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.11.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANIP.Kandhan Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Urrapakkam. 2.The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Urrapakkam. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tambaram, Chengalpattu District. ...Respondents Prayer : This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, call for records inNa.Ka.No.91/2024/A1 dated 23.01.2024 and quash the same and consequently direct the Revenue Divisional Officer to issue the No Objection Certificate for securing the electricity service connection to the property situate at No.11/172, Annai Ambedkar Nagar, Mannivakkam Village, Vandalur Taluk, Chengalpattu District and thereby enable the grant of power supply to the above mentioned property within a time frame fixed by this Honble Court.For Petitioner(s) : M/s.Vasudha Thiagarajan...
The Management of Amalgamations Repco Ltd. vs the Presiding Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.11.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL and C.M.P.No.23214 of 2024 The Management of Amalgamations Repco Ltd., J.Gardens, G.N.T. Road, Chennai 600 110. ... Appellant Vs. 1.The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Chennai. 2.M.N.Murugesan ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, seeking to allow the Writ Appeal and set aside the order dated 29.01.2024 in WP.No.6911 of 2009. For Appellant : Mr.Anand Gopalan for M/s.Agam Legal For R1 : Labour Court For R2 : Mr.Balan HaridasORDER(Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH, J.) It is represented by the learned counsel on both sides that the dispute among the parties have been amicably resolved and a joint memo dated 19.11.2025 has also been filed before this Court. This joint memo supporting the memorandum of settlement under Section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, reads as follows:-2. Reco...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »