K.Prabhakaran Vs Superintending Engineer,

K.Prabhakaran vs Superintending Engineer,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Nov 21, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1885827

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1885827
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice T. Vinod Kumar
Decided On: Nov 21, 2025
Case Number: WP/11944/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.Prabhakaran

Respondent

Superintending Engineer,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 21.11.2025coramthe honourable mr.justice t.vinod kumar and w.m.p. no.12172 of 2019 k.prabhakaran s/o.kangaraj.a, junior engineer, gr-i, (under orders of suspension) o and m pakkam, tangedco, thirunindravur. petitioner(s) vs superintending engineer, respondent(s)prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the respondent relating to the orders passed in memo no.012807 /adm 2 /a1 / f. suspension /2011 dated 10/10/2011, to quash the same and issue consequential directions to the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with consequential benefits.for petitioner : mr.s.madhu balaji for mr.m.ravi for respondent : mr.david sundar singh standing counselorderthe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been granted all the benefits payable to him and the learned standing counsel for the respondent has furnished the details of the same. therefore, he submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and the writ petition has become infructuous. he also made an endorsement to that effect.2. recording the aforesaid submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. no costs. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.speaking (or) non speaking orderindex : yes/ no neutral citation: yes/no mka to: the superintending engineer,t.vinod kumar, j.mka

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.11.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR and W.M.P. No.12172 of 2019 K.Prabhakaran S/o.Kangaraj.A, Junior Engineer, Gr-I, (Under orders of Suspension) O and M Pakkam, TANGEDCO, Thirunindravur. Petitioner(s) Vs Superintending Engineer, Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondent relating to the orders passed in Memo No.012807 /ADM 2 /A1 / F. Suspension /2011 dated 10/10/2011, to quash the same and issue consequential directions to the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with consequential benefits.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Madhu Balaji for Mr.M.Ravi For Respondent : Mr.David Sundar Singh Standing Counsel

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been granted all the benefits payable to him and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent has furnished the details of the same. Therefore, he submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and the writ petition has become infructuous. He also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. Recording the aforesaid submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Speaking (or) Non Speaking Order

Index : Yes/ No Neutral Citation: Yes/No mka To: The Superintending Engineer,

T.VINOD KUMAR, J.

mka

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties K.Prabhakaran vs Superintending Engineer, Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice T. Vinod Kumar