Chennai Orders Court November 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Commissioner of Service Tax vs M/S.Vodaphone Mobile Services Ltd.
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
C.M.P. No.28747 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR. No.140611 of 2023 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J., and P.DHANABAL, J., (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) Seeking to condone the delay of 416 days in representing the appeal, the present petition has been filed.2. On being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, delay of 416 days in representing the appeal is condoned and this petition is allowed. (S.M.S.J.) (P.D.B.J.) 21.11.2025 mmi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M.Rajendran Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON : 12.11.2025PRONOUNCED ON : 21.11.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WMP.Nos.9087, 9088, 9090 & 9091 of 2019 M.Rajendran ... Petitioners in all the cases vs1. The State of Tamil NaduRep by the Agricultural Production Commissioner & Secretary to Government Department of Agriculture Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Commissioner / Director Horticulture and Plantation Crops Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. 3.Shivasubramaniam Samraj Respondents 1 to 3 in all the cases 4.K.J.Kishore Kumar 5.Chandrahasan 6.K.Suganthi 7.M.S.Mohan Ram 8.R.Rajamony 9.G.Srinivasan 10.S.Arunachalam 11.R.Krishnamurthy 12.A.Anburajan13.G.O.Poopathi 14.A.Arputham 15.A.Jayalakshmi 16.A.E.Suresh Kumar 17.P.Tamizhselvi 18.G.K.Uma Rani 19.Venkatarajendra Reddy 20.S.Kannan ... Respondents 4 to 20 in WP.No.8572 of 2019 4.L.R.Raj Gopu 5.S.Muniyandi 6.P.Annamalai 7.A.Manivannan 8.P.Immanuel 9.J.Rajendran 10.K.J.Kishore Kumar 11.Chandrah...
M.Revathi, Vs The Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR M.Revathi, W/o.Murugan, Pandoor, Ulundurpet, Petitioner(s) Vs 5.Bommi, Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 to initiate departmental enquiry and to take departmental action against the 4th and 5th respondents by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 26/06/2018. For Petitioner(s) : No appearance For Respondent(s) : Mr.E.Sundaram Government AdvocateORDERDespite the matter being listed on 24.10.2025 and 07.11.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner.2. Even today (21.11.2025) when the matter is listed under the caption 'fordismissal', there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner either in person or through counsel, which only goes to show that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.3. In view of the above, t...
S Muthulakshmi vs Vicky @Vigneshwaran @ Vignesh
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21.11.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKARS.Muthulakshmi ... Petitioner -Vs- 1.Vicky @ Vigneshwaran @ Vignesh 2.The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.29 of 2022) ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439(2) of Cr.P.C., to cancel the bail granted to the 1st respondent by this Honble Court on 24.02.2023 in Crl.OP.No.1448 of 2023. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.G.Ashok Kumar for R1 Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R2ORDERThis petitioner has been filed for cancellation of bail granted to the first respondent by this Court on 24.02.2023 in Crl.OP.No.1448 of 2023.2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counselappearing for the first respondent/accused submitted that he has no objection to close the petition, as the matter has been settled before the Mediation Centre attached to this Court.3. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for th...
K.S.Ramakrishnan vs T.K.Rajendran Ips
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER CONT P No. 715 of 2016 K.S.Ramakrishnan Petitioner(s) Vs1. T.K.Rajendran IPS The Commissioner Of Police, Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai-600 007. 2.R.Thirugnanam IPS The Addl. Commissioner Of Police, O/o.The Commissioner Of Police, Vepery, Chennai-600 007. 3.R.Dinakaran IPS The Joint Commissioner Of Police, North Zone, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. Contemnor(s)PRAYER Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 Of The Contempt Of Courts Act, 1971, (Central Act 70 of 1971) to punish the respondents for having committed contempt of court for disobeying the Order Dt. 09/02/2016 made in W.M.P.No.4356 of 2016 in W.P.No.4993 of 2016. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Naveen Kumar C.J for M/s.K.M.Ramesh For Contemnor(s): Ms.R.L.Karthika GAORDERLearned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in this Contempt Petition has become infructuous and nothing survives for further adj...
P.O. Abraham, Vs Dr. G.S. Sameeran, I.A.S.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI P.O. Abraham, Son of the late P.Oonnurni, Indian Christian, Thenguvilai House, Myladumparam, Ponthaplavu PO, Pattazy, Kollam, Kerala.Petitioner(s) Vs Dr. G.S. Sameeran, I.A.S., Housing Board, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035. Contemnor(s) PRAYER; Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents herein for the wilful disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble High Court in W.P.No. 16914 of 2020 dated 28.03.2024. For Petitioner(s): M/s. D. Ashok Kumar, T. For Contemnor(s): Mr.D.VeerasekaranORDERThis Contempt Petition is filed seeking to punish the respondents herein for the wilful disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble High Court in W.P.No. 16914 of 2020 dated 28.03.2024.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the as against the order passed by this court, the respondent preferred appeal before t...
The Additional Chief Secretary vs M Ravichandran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
C.M.P.No.4804 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.23977 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDHEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by R. SURESH KUMAR, J.) This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 224 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the petitioners.3. Mr.C.Prakasam, learned counsel takes notice for respondent and he has no serious objection in allowing the petition.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. (R.S.K., J.) (H.C., J.) 21.11.2025 vji https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
P.Loganathan vs the Assistant Engineer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP.No.7037 of 2024 P.Loganathan Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Assistant Engineer, Respondent(s)PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records relating to the online order dated 13.12.2023 cancelling the petitioner application in Application Reference No.200095921123882 by the first respondent quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent herein to give domestic electricity supply as requested vide his aforesaid application in Application Reference No. 200095921123882 dated 25.11.2023 for his house situated at No.316/52 Madha Koil Street, Agili Village, Madurantakam Taluk, For Petitioner(s): No AppearanceORDERWhen the matter is listed on 04.11.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 13.11.2025. Again o...
The State of Tamil Nadu Vs K. Ravi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
C.M.P.No.10045 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.29635 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDHEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by R. SURESH KUMAR, J.) This miscellaneous petition has been filed to dispense with the production of the certified copy of the order dated 15.02.2024 made in W.P.No.32415 of 2023.2. Perusing the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition and satisfying the same, this miscellaneous petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to number the above writ appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise inorder.(R.S.K., J.) (H.C., J.) 21.11.2025 vji https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
AMBIKA PRABHAKARAN Vs The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR W.M.P. No.11468 of 2025 in W.P. No.13361 of 2021 K.Prabhakaran (since deceased)1. Ambika PrabhakaranW/o.Prabhakaran, Puthanpurayil House, Kongatta, P.O, 2.Savias Prabhakaran 3.Rahul Prabhakaran 4.Sham Prabhakaran Petitioner(s)/ Legal heirs of deceased Petitioner Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, 3.The Deputy Inspector of General of Police, Tiruchirappalli Range, Tiruchirappalli. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms.R.J.Radhika For Respondent(s) : Mrs.V.Yamuna Devi Special Government PleaderORDERThis Writ Miscellaneous Petition is filed to bring the proposed petitioners on record, being the legal heirs of the original petitioner who is stated to be deceased during the pendency of the writ petitioner on 04.08.2021.2. The present miscellaneous petition is not opposed by the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.3. Having regard ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »