Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

P.Loganathan vs the Assistant Engineer

P.Loganathan vs The Assistant Engineer

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Nov 21, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1810443

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/6332/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.Loganathan

Respondent

The Assistant Engineer

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 21-11-2025coramthe honourable mr justice m.dhandapani and wmp.no.7037 of 2024 p.loganathan petitioner(s) vs1. the assistant engineer, respondent(s)prayer:- writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, seeking issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records relating to the online order dated 13.12.2023 cancelling the petitioner application in application reference no.200095921123882 by the first respondent quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent herein to give domestic electricity supply as requested vide his aforesaid application in application reference no. 200095921123882 dated 25.11.2023 for his house situated at no.316/52 madha koil street, agili village, madurantakam taluk, for petitioner(s): no appearanceorderwhen the matter is listed on 04.11.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 13.11.2025. again on 13.11.2025, none appears for the petitioner hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 19.11.2025. since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 19.11.2025, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ today i.e., 21.11.2025.2. even today, none appears on behalf of the petitioner. therefore, it isclear that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition. hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. kkn index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no to 1.the assistant engineer, m.dhandapani j. kkn

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21-11-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP.No.7037 of 2024 P.Loganathan Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Assistant Engineer, Respondent(s)

PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records relating to the online order dated 13.12.2023 cancelling the petitioner application in Application Reference No.200095921123882 by the first respondent quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent herein to give domestic electricity supply as requested vide his aforesaid application in Application Reference No. 200095921123882 dated 25.11.2023 for his house situated at No.316/52 Madha Koil Street, Agili Village, Madurantakam Taluk, For Petitioner(s): No Appearance

ORDER

When the matter is listed on 04.11.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 13.11.2025. Again on 13.11.2025, none appears for the petitioner hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 19.11.2025. Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 19.11.2025, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ today i.e., 21.11.2025.

2. Even today, none appears on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, it is

clear that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. kkn Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The Assistant Engineer, M.DHANDAPANI J. KKN

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties P.Loganathan vs The Assistant Engineer Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales