Chennai Orders Court November 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jayanthy, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 24.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN W.P.No.23454 of 2016 and W.M.P.Nos.20125 and 20126 of 2016 1.Jayanthy, D/o C.Boopathy, No.23A, Maduramettur, Chinna Iyankulam Village, Kancheepuram District 631 502. 2.D.B.Arokiaraj S/o J.Balasamy 15J/9-2, Damalvar Street, Big, 3.V.Asha, D/o Venkatesan, A.R No.31/15A, Middle Street, Anumanthaputheri, Chengalpattu, Kancheepuram District. 603 002.4.M.Saravanan No.5, Chelliyamman Koil St., Siruvallur Village, Page Nos.1/13 Polambakkam Post, Maduranthagam Taluk 603 309. 5.K.Saravanan No.8/961, Vanniyar Street, Choolaimedu, Chennai 600 094.6.K.N.Varadarajan S/o Nagappan Plot No.123, AK Alwar Street, Narasinmma Pallavan Nagar, Orikkai, Kancheepuram District 6531 501. 7.N.Ravichandran, S/o Narasimhan, No.165, Thiruvallur District, Thirupukuzhi Taluk, 8.V.M.Manimegalai, W/o S.Sukumar, Bavasahibpet Village, Ekanampettai Post, Ayyampettai via, Kancheepuram District. 9.J.Daisy Rani, D/o Jayasee...
P.Satyanarayanan vs Jain Housing
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-24-2025
DATED: 24-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL and C.M.P.No.8580 of 2023 Mr.P.Satyanarayanan ..Revision Petitioner/Petitioner/ 2nd Defendant Vs1. M/s.Jain Housing A registered Partnership Firm, Rep, by its Partner, Mr.Sandeep Mehta, T.Nagar, Chennai 17.2. Mr.Chanaram Seni ...Respondents 1 and 2/Respondents 13. Mr.S.Sudhakar and 2 /Plaintiffs4. The District Registrar,Chennai South, Jones Road, Saidapet, Chennai 15. 5.M/s.Jain Housing and Construction Limited, Represented by its Authorised Representative, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017 ...Respondents 3 to 5 /Respondents 3 to 5/ Defendants 1,3 and 4 PRAYER Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the constitution of India, 1950 praying to set aside the Fair and Decretal Order dated February 3, 2023 made in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in O.S.No.5469 of 2018 by VIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. For Petitioners: Ms.Sai Jhashwanthi for Mr.D.Baskar For Respondent-4: Mr.M.Murali, Government AdvocateORDERMs.Sai Jhashwanthi,...
S.K.Subbiah vs Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-24-2025
C.M.P.No.26862 of 2023 in W.A.SR.No.38029 of 2023R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDHEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 351 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents and he has no serious objection in allowing the petition.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [H.C., J.] 24.11.2025 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
NAGAPPAN Vs Soundharajan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-24-2025
CMP No.8231 of 2023 in CRP SR No.39859 of 2023P.B.BALAJI.,J.Heard Mr.D.Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.A.Ravindran, learned counsel for the first respondent.2. The delay of 162 days in filing the revision is sought to be condoned in and by way of CMP.3. There is no serious objectionto the delay being condoned, the learned counsel for the respondent also fairly submitted that delay can be condoned. However, in filing the appeal there has been a delay that can be taken care of when the appropriate stage arises and in view of the same, the present application for condonation of delay in filing the revision is ordered.24.11.2025 mtl...
K.Palani vs the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.11.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and W.M.P.Nos.14494 & 14621 of 2025 K.Palani . Petitioner Vs 1.The Secretary to Government, Cooperative Food and Consumer Department, Fort St.George, Chennai. 2.The Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Kilpauk, Chennai. 3.The Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies, 4.The Managing Director, Vellore District Central Cooperative Bank, Vellore. . Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order passed by the 1st respondent in Letter No.3123/CC2/2024-4 Cooperation, Food and Consumer Protection (CP1) Department dated 24.02.2025 confirming his earlier order passed in G.O (Rt)No.14 Cooperation,Food and Consumer Protection (CP1) Department dated 06.02.2014 orderpassed by the 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.No.3145/2012/A2 (Revision Petition No. Na.Ka.No....
Bhuvaneshwari Ponnusamy Vs Ponnusamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-24-2025
inIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-11-2025CORAMHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL in Bhuvaneswari Ponnusamy ...Applicant/Petitioner Vs Ponnusamy ...Respondent/Respondent For Applicant : M/s.B.Poongkhulali For Respondent : Mr.M.VijayaragavanORDERToday when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel on either side are present and submit that the matter has been settled between Page No.1 of 3 in the parties through the Mediation Centre. The Mediation Report was also received by this Court. Along with the Mediation Report, the Settlement Agreement dated 12.11.2025 is also enclosed. As per the Settlement Agreement, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Recording the above-said settlement, this application is closed in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 12.11.2025. 24-11-2025 (1/2) dk Page No.2 of 3 in P.DHANABAL J. dk in 24.11.2025 Page No.3 of 3...
G.V.Vasan Vs Mr. Hanish Bansal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.11.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY G.V.Vasan ... Petitioner Vs Mr.Hanish Bansal, Chairman and Executive Director, R.G.Stone Urology Laparoscopy Hospital, (R.G.Scientific Enterprises Private Limited Sangam, No. 391, Anna Salai, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015. ... Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondent for committing contempt of Court by disobeying the orders of this Court dated 20.12.2024 in W.M.P.No.24344 of 2023 in W.P.No.8305 of 2023. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kumaraswamy For Respondent : Mr.R.PrabhakaranORDERThe contempt petition has been filed complaining willful disobedience of the Order passed by this Court in W.M.P.No.24344 of 2023 in W.P.No.8305 of 2023 dated 20.12.2024.2. Today, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent has handedover the demand draft for a sum of Rs.5,90,700/- to the learned counsel appearing for ...
M.Sevanthi vs the District Collector/Chairman
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN WP No. 14748 of 2025 and WMP No.16649 of 2025 M.Sevanthi Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District Collector/Chairman2.The Secretary/Deputy Director, 3.The District Health Officer, 4.Dr.Rajkumar BHMS Government Primary Health Center, Karapattu Village, Uthangarai, Respondent(s) Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to call for the records of the respondents in connection with the impugned ordered issued by the 1st respondent in R.No.4035/A1/2023-4 dated 08.10.2024 and quash the same and further direct the 1st respondent to appoint the petitioner as medical officer in Bachelor of Homeopathy Medical Science. For Petitioner(s): Mr. Dinesh Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Bindran AGPORDERThis writ petition has been filed challenging the order of appointment dated 08.10.2024, thereby appointing the fourth respondent a...
The Employees State Insurance Corporation vs M/S.Road Map I.T.Solution ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.11.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI andCorporation, Regional Office, Puducherry, represented by its Regional Director/ Quasi Judicial Authority .. Appellant vs. M/s. Road Map I.T.Solutions (P) Ltd., No.5, Republic Street, Reddiyarpalayam, Puducherry .. Respondent PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 82(2) of Employee State Insurance Act to set aside the order dated 09.03.2021 passed in ESIOP.No.05 of 2018 by the Employees State InsuranceFor Appellant : Mr.S.P. Srinivasan For Respondent : Mr. A.S. ThambusamyJUDGMENTThe learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal stating that the State Insurance Corporation on 24.07.2025, has introduced an Amnesty Scheme for the purpose of one time settlement of all the disputes pending as on 31.03.2025 and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. The learned counsel would also submit that the appellant is willin...
P.Devanadhan vs the Assistant Executive Engineer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI AND WMP No. 14791 of 2024P.Devanadhan S/o.Late.R. Pichandi, No.13,Sivaraman Nagar, Panruti, Cuddalore District. Petitioner(s) Vs Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned proceedings of the respondent bearing Proceeding No.f/vz;/c/br/bgh-,g-rpj;juNh;- nfh/fl;L-m/vz;/009-2024=25 dated 25.04.2024 and to quash the same and further issue necessary direction, forbearing the respondent from disconnecting the service connection No.022-002-201.For Petitioner(s): A.Prabhakaran For Respondent(s): Mr. V.Venkataseshaiya, Standing CounselORDERThis writ petition has been filed, challenging the impugned proceedings dated 25.04.2024 and seeking a direction, forbearing the respondent from disconnecting the service connection. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »