Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P.Devanadhan vs the Assistant Executive Engineer

P.Devanadhan vs The Assistant Executive Engineer

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Nov 24, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1923425

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/13632/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.Devanadhan

Respondent

The Assistant Executive Engineer

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 24-11-2025coramthe honourable mr justice m.dhandapani and wmp no. 14791 of 2024p.devanadhan s/o.late.r. pichandi, no.13,sivaraman nagar, panruti, cuddalore district. petitioner(s) vs respondent(s) prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of constitution of india, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned proceedings of the respondent bearing proceeding no.f/vz;/c/br/bgh-,g-rpj;junh;- nfh/fl;l-m/vz;/009-2024=25 dated 25.04.2024 and to quash the same and further issue necessary direction, forbearing the respondent from disconnecting the service connection no.022-002-201.for petitioner(s): a.prabhakaran for respondent(s): mr. v.venkataseshaiya, standing counselorderthis writ petition has been filed, challenging the impugned proceedings dated 25.04.2024 and seeking a direction, forbearing the respondent from disconnecting the service connection. 2.the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, as against the impugned demand dated 25.04.2024, an appeal remedy is available before the executive engineer. therefore, this court may permit the petitioner to raise all contentions before the appellate authority.3. recording the above submissions, this writ petition is dismissed.however, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the appellate authority within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. upon such filing, the appellate authority shall conclude the proceedings within a period of six weeks thereafter. consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. no costs. index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no uma to m.dhandapani j. uma and wmp no. 14791 of 2024

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24-11-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI AND WMP No. 14791 of 2024

P.Devanadhan S/o.Late.R. Pichandi, No.13,Sivaraman Nagar, Panruti, Cuddalore District. Petitioner(s) Vs Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned proceedings of the respondent bearing Proceeding No.f/vz;/c/br/bgh-,g-rpj;juNh;- nfh/fl;L-m/vz;/009-2024=25 dated 25.04.2024 and to quash the same and further issue necessary direction, forbearing the respondent from disconnecting the service connection No.022-002-201.

For Petitioner(s): A.Prabhakaran For Respondent(s): Mr. V.Venkataseshaiya, Standing Counsel

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed, challenging the impugned proceedings dated 25.04.2024 and seeking a direction, forbearing the respondent from disconnecting the service connection. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, as against the impugned demand dated 25.04.2024, an appeal remedy is available before the Executive Engineer. Therefore, this Court may permit the petitioner to raise all contentions before the Appellate Authority.

3. Recording the above submissions, this writ petition is dismissed.

However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the Appellate Authority within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Upon such filing, the Appellate Authority shall conclude the proceedings within a period of six weeks thereafter. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No uma To M.DHANDAPANI J. uma AND WMP No. 14791 OF 2024

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial