Chennai Orders Court November 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.KALAVATHY Vs The Authorised Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.11.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI C.M.A.No.1235 of 2023 1.S.Kalavathy 2.M/s.HR.Business Services, Rep.by its Proprietor, Kalavathy ...Appellant vs. 1.The Authorised Officer, 2.The Recovery Officer, Chennai 600 034. .. Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 82 of Employee State Insurance Act to set aside the order dated 23.12.2022 passed in I.A.No.2 of 2022 in OP.SR.No.260 of 2022 on the file of the Principal Labour Court, Chennai and consequently modify the saidorder and to adjust the attached amount of Rs.40,000/- ( Appellant'sSavings Bank Account No.1911228484, maintained in the Kotak Mahindra Bank, Kelambakkam Brach) and permit to pay balance amount of Rs.24,886.25. For Appellant : Mr.G.Peranban For R1 & R2 : Mr.S.P.SrinivasanJUDGMENTThe learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating that the respondents Employees State Insurance Corporation on 24.07.2025, has...
Nehru vs Easwari Devi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-27-2025
Crl.M.P.No.22550 of 2025 in Crl.RC.SR.No.11158 of 2024T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 30 days in filing the above Criminal Revision Case against the order dated 12.10.2023 passed by the learned Family Court, Chengalpattu in F.C.M.C.No.43 of 2021.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.3. On being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 30 days is condoned and the petition is ordered. 27.11.2025 rpp Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision Case, if it is otherwise ttfound to be in order....
S.Ruban Yesudass vs the Chief Educational Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN WP No. 8382 of 2025 and WMP No.9402 of 2025 S.Ruban Yesudass, Record Clerk, Nagapattinam. Petitioner(s) Vs Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to approve the petitioners appointment as Record clerk w.e.f 27.11.2018 and pay arrears of salary with all consequential monetary benefits and retirement benefits arising thereon and by considering the proposal dated 07.12.2021 and 27.10.2022 sent by the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent within the period that may be stipulated by this court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Venkatesan Ajmal Associations For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Prabhakaran Government Advocate for R1 & R2ORDERThis writ petition has been filed for a direction directing the second respondent to approve the petitioners appointment as Record clerk w.e.f 27....
Selvaraj Arputharaj vs the Commercial Tax Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-11-2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and W.M.P.No.13964 of 2025 Selvaraj Arputharaj Proprietor of AVR TRANSPORT, Old No. 31C, New No. 86, Kailasanathar Koil Street, Chengalpet, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu, 603001 ..Petitioner Vs The Commercial Tax Officer, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu. ..Respondent PRAYER This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the Respondent bearing reference number No. ZD3301251656696 dated 21.01.2025 and quash the same. For Petitioner: Ms.GAYATHRI S For Respondent: Ms. Amirtapoonkodi Dinakaran, Government Advocate (T)ORDERThe impugned order dated 21.01.2025 bearing reference number No. ZD3301251656696 has been challenged by the Petitioner primarily on the ground that the Respondent has not made out a case for invoking extended period of limitation.2.The learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that the pr...
S.Saravanamurthy Vs The Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P Nos.13630, 13633, 13636 & 13639 of 2020 S.Saravanamurthy S/O. Of late K. Subramaniam, Old No. 456, New no 690- A Rangaygowder street, South Ukadam Coimbatore. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Commissioner Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Big Bazaar Street Coimbatore- 6410012. The Commissioner of Police Office of the Commissioner of Police Coimbatore-641 018. 3.The Inspector of Police B-1, Big Bazaar Police Station Coimbatore-641 001. 4.The Assistant Commissioner/Executive Officer, Arulmigu Varasakthi Vinayakar Thirukoil, South Udakam, Coimbatore. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): No Appearance For Respondent(s): Mr. K.Magesh for R1 Mr.S.Balaji, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R2 & R3 M/s.R.Rajesh Vivekananthan For R4ORDERWhen the matter came up for hearing on 26.11.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence, the matter was directed to be post...
Vishal D Bothra vs the State Rep by Its,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.11.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and1. Vishal D.Bothra2. Alex @ Paul Francis Xavier ... Petitioners Vs.1. The State represented by, The Inspector of Police,2. Vivek RamsisariaManaging Director, M/s.Virgo Polymer (India) Ltd., No.1, Sundaram Illam, Door No.9, 2nd Floor, Chellammal Street, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai 600 030. ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita/Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records relating to the charge sheet in C.C.No.2084 of 2024 together withorder framing charge dated 27.11.2024 on the file of the 11th MetropolitanMagistrate, Saidapet, Chennai and thereby quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Senthilnathan For R1 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Additional Public ProsecutorORDERThe present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings pending against the petitioners/A1 and A2 in C.C.No.2084...
Suresh Vs Sachin
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-27-2025
C.M.P.No.15902 of 2025 C.M.P.No.15902 of 2025 in C.M.A.Sr.No.62266 of 2025R. KALAIMATHI, J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 236 days in filing the above appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Ms.R.P.Usha, learned counsel would submit that Mr.D.Venkatachalam, undertakes to file vakalat for the second respondent and he does not have serious objection in allowing this petition.4. The petitioner would aver that on account of the injuries sustained by him, he was not in a position to mobilize funds for preferring the appeal and therefore, delay of 236 days occurred in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.5. Accepting the averments made by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to allow this Civil Miscellaneous Petition subject to the condition that the interest for the delay period of 236 days shall stand waived. 27.11.2025 Mac https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Greeta Musical Instruments and Manufacturing Exports Ltd vs the Joint ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.11.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHIand C.M.P.No.10629 of 2024 Greeta Musical Instruments and Manufacturing Exports Ltd., 54, Village Square, Valluvar Kottam High Road, Chennai-600 034. ...Appellant vs. 1.The Joint Director, 2.The Recovery Officer, Chennai 600 034. ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 82(2) of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948,to set aside the Order and Decree of the Employees Insurance Court (Principal Labour Court), Chennai, dated 08.07.2022 in E.I.O.P.No.29 of 2011. For Appellant : Mr.S.Haroon Rasheedfor AGAM LEGAL For Respondents : Mr.G.BharadwajJUDGMENTThe learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating that the respondents Employees State Insurance Corporation on 24.07.2025, has introduced an Amnesty Scheme for the purpose of one time settlement of all the disputes pending as on 31.03.2025.2. The learned counsel would also submit that the ap...
Dr.T.Paul Durai Manimozhian Vs Akila Thiruvithancore Siddha Vaidya San ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABALDr.T.Paul Durai Manimozhian S/o.Thomas, 21-157, Muttavilai, Arumanai, Kanyakumari 629 151. Plaintiff(s) Vs Akila Thiruvithancore Siddha Vaidya Sangam Munchirai, Pudukkadai Post, Kanyakumari District Rep.by its Interim Administrator Justice A.Ramamurthi and 5 others Defendant(s) For Plaintiff(s): M/s.N.V.N.Margandeyan For Defendant(s): M/s.V.K.Sathiamurthy [for D1] D2-set Exparte M/s.P.Padmeshwari [for D3] D4- Died M/S.CKM.APPAJI [for D5 and D6]ORDERAs per the order passed by this Court dated 06.12.2024, the Suit which was pending on the file of the I Additional District Court, Kuzhithurai in O.S. No.131 of 2024 was transferred to this Court and re-numbered as C.S. No.56 of 2025 to try along with the Suit in C.S. No.150 of 2024 pending before this Court. Both the Suits have to be tried together. Already the said Suit pending before this Court in C.S. No.150 of 2024 was dismissed as withdr...
E. Joseph @ Ravi vs D. Chitra @ Stella
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR and C.M.P.Nos.8668 and 8669 of 2025 E.Joseph @ Ravi ... Petitioner vs. D.Chitra @ Stella ... Respondent PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to quash the entire proceeding in connection with the D.V.C.No.6 of 2024 on the file of Additional Mahila Judge at Tiruvallur. For Petitioner : Mr.A.R.Pradhosh for M/s.T.Ravi For Respondent : LeftS.SOUNTHAR, J.dmORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the civil revision petition and he has also made an endorsement in the court bundle to that effect.2. Leave is granted. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petitions are closed. 26.11.2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking order : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No dm To The Additional Mahila Judge, Tiruvallur....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »