Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Suresh Vs Sachin

Suresh vs Sachin

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Nov 27, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1923270

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/15902/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Suresh

Respondent

Sachin

Excerpt

c.m.p.no.15902 of 2025 c.m.p.no.15902 of 2025 in c.m.a.sr.no.62266 of 2025r. kalaimathi, j.this civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 236 days in filing the above appeal.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. ms.r.p.usha, learned counsel would submit that mr.d.venkatachalam, undertakes to file vakalat for the second respondent and he does not have serious objection in allowing this petition.4. the petitioner would aver that on account of the injuries sustained by him, he was not in a position to mobilize funds for preferring the appeal and therefore, delay of 236 days occurred in filing the civil miscellaneous appeal.5. accepting the averments made by the petitioner, this court is inclined to allow this civil miscellaneous petition subject to the condition that the interest for the delay period of 236 days shall stand waived. 27.11.2025 mac https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

C.M.P.No.15902 of 2025 C.M.P.No.15902 of 2025 in C.M.A.Sr.No.62266 of 2025

R. KALAIMATHI, J.

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 236 days in filing the above appeal.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. Ms.R.P.Usha, learned counsel would submit that Mr.D.Venkatachalam, undertakes to file vakalat for the second respondent and he does not have serious objection in allowing this petition.

4. The petitioner would aver that on account of the injuries sustained by him, he was not in a position to mobilize funds for preferring the appeal and therefore, delay of 236 days occurred in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

5. Accepting the averments made by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to allow this Civil Miscellaneous Petition subject to the condition that the interest for the delay period of 236 days shall stand waived. 27.11.2025 Mac https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties Suresh vs Sachin Same Judge Honourable Mrs.Justice R. Kalaimathi

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales