Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

N.Natarajan and another Vs Mr.Senthil,

N.Natarajan and another vs Mr.Senthil,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Oct 29, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1867321

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CONT P/1407/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

N.Natarajan and another

Respondent

Mr.Senthil,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 29.10.2025coramthe honourable mr.justice s.sounthar1. m.natarajan, s/o.t.murugesa mudaliar2. n.gowri, w/o.m.natarajan ... petitioners vs. mr.senthil, tashildhar, pallavaram ... respondentcontempt petition filed u/s.11 of the contempt of courts act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for the disobedience of the orders in w.p.no.30503 of 2024 dated 17.10.2024. for petitioners : mr.n.suresh for respondent : mr.g.velu additional government pleader *****s.sounthar, j.mpordertoday, when the contempt petition is taken up for hearing, the learned additional government pleader appearing for the respondent would submit that pursuant to the direction issued by this court in the main writ petition, the representation of the petitioners has been considered and patta has been issued in their name in patta no.10560 and he has also produced the same before this court.2. recording the same, this contempt petition is closed. 29.10.2025 neutral citation: yes/no index: yes/nospeaking order/non-speaking ordermp

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29.10.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

1. M.Natarajan, S/o.T.Murugesa Mudaliar

2. N.Gowri, W/o.M.Natarajan ... Petitioners Vs. Mr.Senthil, Tashildhar, Pallavaram ... Respondent

Contempt Petition filed u/s.11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for the disobedience of the orders in W.P.No.30503 of 2024 dated 17.10.2024. For Petitioners : Mr.N.Suresh For Respondent : Mr.G.Velu Additional Government Pleader *****

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

mp

ORDER

Today, when the contempt petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent would submit that pursuant to the direction issued by this Court in the main writ petition, the representation of the petitioners has been considered and patta has been issued in their name in patta No.10560 and he has also produced the same before this Court.

2. Recording the same, this contempt petition is closed. 29.10.2025 Neutral Citation: Yes/No Index: yes/no

Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order

mp

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties N.Natarajan and another vs Mr.Senthil, Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales